본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Licensing Instrument Phrases: A Corpus Study of With-PPs in English

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

I investigate in this paper how instrument with-PPs in English are licensed given that they are not syntactically obligatory. It is examined whether the presence of instrument PPs is constrained by the predicates (which will verify the argumenthood of instrument) and if so, what properties of the predicates license their presence. More specifically, it is tested whether the presence of instruments is influenced by such semantic, morphological, and syntactic properties of the predicates as semantic obligatoriness, morphological relatedness to instrument nouns,subject agentivity, and instrument-subject alternatability. The data for the current study have been gathered from the 100-million-word BYU-BNC corpus. This corpus study shows that all four properties, which are lexical properties of predicates, are significant factors that contribute to licensing the instrument with-PPs in English.

Abstract

I investigate in this paper how instrument with-PPs in English are licensed given that they are not syntactically obligatory. It is examined whether the presence of instrument PPs is constrained by the predicates (which will verify the argumenthood of instrument) and if so, what properties of the predicates license their presence. More specifically, it is tested whether the presence of instruments is influenced by such semantic, morphological, and syntactic properties of the predicates as semantic obligatoriness, morphological relatedness to instrument nouns,subject agentivity, and instrument-subject alternatability. The data for the current study have been gathered from the 100-million-word BYU-BNC corpus. This corpus study shows that all four properties, which are lexical properties of predicates, are significant factors that contribute to licensing the instrument with-PPs in English.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Baayen,R.Harald, "Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  2. Boland,Jule E, "Visual arguments", Cognition, 95, pp.237~274 (2005)
  3. "Architecture and interface by Mark Davies"[URL]
  4. Carlson, Greg, "Thematic roles and language comprehension In Thematic Relations. Syntax and Semantics", pp.263~291 (1988), Academic Press
  5. 최혜원, "The Distinction of Argument and Adjunct as a Gradient Notion", 언어와 정보, 14(1), pp.25~48 (2010), 한국언어정보학회
  6. Chomsky,Noam, "On WH-movement In Formal Syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
  7. Cinque,Gerulamo, "Types of A-bar Dependencies" (1990), MIT Press
  8. Cowper,Elizabeth A, "A Concise Introduction to Syntactic Theory: The Government-Binding Approach" (1992), University of Chicago Press
  9. Dowty,David, "Grammatical relations and Montague Grammar. The Nature of Syntactic Representation", pp.79~130 (1982), Reidel
  10. Dowty,David, "On the semantic content of the notion of 'Thematic Role.' Properties, Types, and Meaning", pp.79~130 (1989), Kluwer
  11. Emonds,Joseph, "A Tranformational Approach to English Syntax" (1976), Academic Press
  12. Grimshaw,Jane, "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
  13. Jackendoff,Ray, "X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure" (1977), MIT Press
  14. Koenig, Jean-Pierre, "Arguments for adjuncts", Cognition, 89, pp.67~103 (2003)
  15. Levin,Beth, "English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  16. Levin, Beth, "Argument Realization" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  17. Marantz,Alec, "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations" (1984), MIT Press
  18. Pinker,Steven, "Learnability and Cognition" (1991), MIT Press
  19. Pollard, Carl, "An Information-Based Syntax and Semantics vol. 1: Fundamentals" (1987), CSLI Publications
  20. "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2010)[URL]
  21. Radford,Andrew, "Tranformational Grammar: A First Course" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  22. Reinhart,Tanya, "Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation" (1983), Croom Helm
  23. Rizzi,Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" (1990), MIT Press
  24. PP attachment and argumenthood, "Schütze,Carson T", MIT, 95~151 (1995)
  25. Schütze, Carson T, "Argumenthood and English prepositional phrase attachment", Journal of Memory and Language, 40, pp.409~431 (1999)
  26. Sedivy, Julie C, "The use of structural, lexical, and pragmatic information in parsing attachment ambiguities In Perspectives on Sentence Processing", pp.389~413 (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum
  27. Spivey-Knowlton, "Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints", Cognition, 55, pp.227~267 (1995)
  28. Van Valin,Robert Jr, "Advances in Role and Reference Grammar" (1993), John Benjamins
  29. Van Valin, Robert Jr, "Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function" (1997), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)