본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-situ in Two Types of Wh-in-situ Languages - A Processing Account

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Wh-in-situ in Korean are known to show wh-island effects while those in Chinese do not. In this paper, I show that a simple explanation for this difference can be found if we recognize that wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association are garden path sentences and that what we call the wh-island effects of wh-in-situ in Korean is not the unacceptability of wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association but the high likelihood of misinterpreting such sentences as having the local scope. If so, the question why wh-in-situ in Chinese do not show wh-island effects can be recast as why wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association in Chinese are not or less prone to such a misinterpretation, and an answer for this question can be found in some trivial differences in the use of Q-particles between the two languages. As further support, I show that some of the intra-linguistic variations in wh-island in Korean can be explained in the same ways the absence of wh-island effects in Chinese is explained. I also explore the possibility that this account can be extended to other wh-in-situ languages.

Abstract

Wh-in-situ in Korean are known to show wh-island effects while those in Chinese do not. In this paper, I show that a simple explanation for this difference can be found if we recognize that wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association are garden path sentences and that what we call the wh-island effects of wh-in-situ in Korean is not the unacceptability of wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association but the high likelihood of misinterpreting such sentences as having the local scope. If so, the question why wh-in-situ in Chinese do not show wh-island effects can be recast as why wh-in-situ questions with a non-local wh-Q association in Chinese are not or less prone to such a misinterpretation, and an answer for this question can be found in some trivial differences in the use of Q-particles between the two languages. As further support, I show that some of the intra-linguistic variations in wh-island in Korean can be explained in the same ways the absence of wh-island effects in Chinese is explained. I also explore the possibility that this account can be extended to other wh-in-situ languages.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Brṻhn, Daniel, "LF wh-movement in Mong Leng", 석사, pp.2007
  2. Cheng, Lisa, "On the typology of wh-in-situ questions", 박사, pp.1991
  3. Choe, Jae-Woong, "LF movement and pied-piping", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.348~353 (1987)
  4. Christensen, Ken Ramsh∅j, "Syntactic reconstruction and reprocessing, semantic dead ends, and prefrontal cortex", Brain and Cognition, 73, pp.41~53 (2010)
  5. Fodor, Janet Dean, "Garden path re-analysis: Attach (anyway) and revision as last resort, In Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing", pp.21~61 (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  6. Frazier, Lyn, "The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model", Cognition, 6, pp.1~34 (1978)
  7. Görgülü, Emrah, "Variable wh-words in Turkish", 박사, pp.2006
  8. Kluender, Robert, "On the distinction between strong and weak islands: A processing perspective, In Syntax and semantics 29: The limits of syntax", pp.241~279 (1998), Academic Press
  9. Krotochvil, Paul, "Intonation in Beijing Chinese, In Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages", pp.417~431 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  10. Lee, Ok Joo, "The prosody of question in Beijing Mandarin", 박사, pp.2005
  11. Li, Audrey, "Indefinite wh in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.125~155 (1992), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  12. Nishigauci, Taisuke, "Quantification in the theory of grammar" (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  13. Richards, Norvin, "The principle of minimal compliance", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.599~629 (1998)
  14. Rujigrok, Bobby, "The prosody of wh-in-situ questions in Mandarin Chinese", 석사, pp.2012
  15. Sobin, Nicholas, "Echo questions in the Minimalist Program", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.131~148 (2010)
  16. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan, "On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies", 박사, pp.1994
  17. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan, "Lexical courtesy revisited: Evidence from Tsou and Seediq wh-constructions", Gengo Kenkyu, 123, pp.331~361 (2003)
  18. Watanabe, Akira, "Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.255~291 (1992)
  19. 윤정미, "A Note on the Controversy over the Nature of Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-situ Questions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 20(4), pp.627~654 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
  20. 윤정미, "Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-situ Questions in Korean: More Variations and More Problems", 생성문법연구, 21(4), pp.763~778 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
  21. 윤정미, "Wh-island Effects in Korean Wh-in-Situ Questions: Degradedness or Misinterpretation?", 언어, 37(2), pp.357~382 (2012), 한국언어학회
  22. Jeong-Me Yoon, "Variations in the wh-island effects of wh-in-situ questions in Korean - A processing account", 석사, pp.2013
  23. Jeong-Me Yoon, "Additional wh effects revisited - A processing perspective", In Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar 15, pp.519~534 (2013), Hankuk Publishing Co

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)