Non-movement vs. Movement in Japanese Dative Case-marked Fragment
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Fragment answers to interrogative sentences are usually considered to take place due to the economy of language. Among fragment answers, this paper deals with Japanese dative case-marked fragment answer. With respect to the interpretation of Japanese dative case-marked fragment answer, Fukaya (2014) argues for LF analysis, but the Fukaya (2014)'s analysis has problem. The purpose of this paper is to point out the problem of Fukaya (2014)'s analysis and demonstrate that movement analysis offers a promising alternative.
Abstract
Fragment answers to interrogative sentences are usually considered to take place due to the economy of language. Among fragment answers, this paper deals with Japanese dative case-marked fragment answer. With respect to the interpretation of Japanese dative case-marked fragment answer, Fukaya (2014) argues for LF analysis, but the Fukaya (2014)'s analysis has problem. The purpose of this paper is to point out the problem of Fukaya (2014)'s analysis and demonstrate that movement analysis offers a promising alternative.
참고문헌 (24)
- 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.19~35 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- Chierchia, Gennaro, "Functional wh and weak crossover", West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 10, pp.75~90 (1991)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), The MIT Press
- Den Dikken, Marcel, "Arguments for successive-cyclic movement through Spec-CP: a critical review", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 9, pp.89~126 (2009)
- Fukaya, Teruhiko, "Island-sensitivityin Fragment Ellipsis in Japanese", Academic Knowledge Archives of Gunma Institutes, 35, pp.1~21 (2014), Gunma Prefectural Women’s University
- Hoshi, Koji, "Remarks onN-final relativization in Japanese", The Hiyoshi Review of English Studies, 44, pp.113~147 (2004)
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "Missing Links: Cleft, Sluicing and ‘o da’ Construction in Japanese", The Proceedings of HUMIT 2001, 43, pp.35~34 (2002), MIT
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese", Syntax, 15, pp.142~180 (2012)
- Morita, H., "Evidence for movement in the derivation of relative clauses in Japanese", Mulberry, 61, pp.67~94 (2012)
- Ken Hiraiwa, "Syntactic metamorphosis: cleft, sluicing, and insitu focus in Japanese", Syntax, 15, pp.142~180 (2012)
- Kuno, S., "The structure of the Japanese language" (1973), MIT Press
- Lasnik, Howard, "When can you save a structure by destroying it?", Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 31, 2, pp.301~320 (2001), GLSA
- Barros, Matthew. to appear, "A non-repair approach to island-sensitivity in contrastive TP ellipsis", Proceedings of Chicago Linguistics Society 48
- Maki Kishida, "Reflexives in Japanese", 박사, pp.2011
- Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Nishigauchi, T., "Short Answers: Ellipsis, Connectivity, and Island Repair", 석사, pp.2006
- 박명관, "On the Syntax of Multiple Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (80), pp.1~22 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Island-insensitive fragment answers in Korean", Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.317~325 (2005)
- Rizzi, L., "Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
- 사이토 마모루, "일본어 분열문에서의 생략과 대명사 지시", 현대문법연구, (36), pp.1~44 (2004), 현대문법학회
- Tanomura, T., (2002), Izumi Shoin
- Watanabe, Akira, "Subjacency and S-Structure movement of wh-in-situ", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.255~291 (1992)
- Case Drop from Fragment Answers in Korean, "Yoon, Junghyoe", 1~, pp.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 19 (2013)