본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인용구문에서 형성된 경상방언 종결어미 ‘-다카이’ 연구 - 중부방언 ‘-다니까’와의 비교를 중심으로 -

A Study on the Final Ending “-dakai” in Gyeongsang Dialect Derived from Quotation Constructions - Focused on Comparing “-dakai” with Midland Dialect “-danigga”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study aims to reconstruct the original form of the Gyeongsang dialect's final ending “-dakai”, and to clarify its morphological, syntactic, and semantic characteristics. As this ending is interchangeable with the Midland dialect's “-danigga” in many aspects, it has received little special attention in studies of the Gyeongsang dialect until now. However, in actual discourse, the two endings possess different semantic features and are subject to separate syntactic constraints. The endings “-danigga” and “-dakai” share the basic meaning of revisiting the content of a past utterance at the time of the current speech. The focus of “-danigga” is on a consequent utterance that has not yet been realized. Hence, the listener is required to infer the content implied by “-danigga”' and to take actions that align with the speaker’s expectations. On the other hand, the Gyeongsang dialect “-dakai” emphasizes the act of utterance and displays an attitude of certainty towards the proposition. Because it is impossible for the listener to question content that the speaker has already confirmed as fact, “-dakai” is difficult to use in interrogative sentences.

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the original form of the Gyeongsang dialect's final ending “-dakai”, and to clarify its morphological, syntactic, and semantic characteristics. As this ending is interchangeable with the Midland dialect's “-danigga” in many aspects, it has received little special attention in studies of the Gyeongsang dialect until now. However, in actual discourse, the two endings possess different semantic features and are subject to separate syntactic constraints. The endings “-danigga” and “-dakai” share the basic meaning of revisiting the content of a past utterance at the time of the current speech. The focus of “-danigga” is on a consequent utterance that has not yet been realized. Hence, the listener is required to infer the content implied by “-danigga”' and to take actions that align with the speaker’s expectations. On the other hand, the Gyeongsang dialect “-dakai” emphasizes the act of utterance and displays an attitude of certainty towards the proposition. Because it is impossible for the listener to question content that the speaker has already confirmed as fact, “-dakai” is difficult to use in interrogative sentences.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 구종남, "융합형 종결어미 ‘-다니까’의 의미와 문법화", 한민족어문학, 85, pp.81~115 (2019)
  2. 김민국, "한국어 정보구조의 초점", 한국어학, 91, pp.1~50 (2021)
  3. 김영태, "경북 방언 ‘카다’ 용언에 대하여", 우리말글, 7, pp.1~16 (1989)
  4. 김정대, "경남방언 구획 문제를 다시 생각한다", 배달말, 51, pp.45~90 (2012)
  5. 김태엽, "국어 비종결어미의 종결어미화에 대하여", 언어학, 22, pp.171~189 (1998)
  6. 김한별, "경남 방언의 ‘X고 하다’ 구문의 모문 동사 ‘쿠다’의 형성 동기와 과정", 방언학, 30, pp.231~271 (2019)
  7. 남기심, "국어 연결어미의 쓰임" (1991), 서광학술자료사
  8. 남기심, "논리형식으로서의 ‘-니까’ 구 문과 ‘-어서’ 구문" (1983), 탑출판사
  9. 도재학, "대구방언 ‘카다’의 문법", 현대문법연구, 117, pp.43~64 (2023)
  10. 목지선, "복합형어미 ‘-다니까’의 의미와 통사적 특성", 어문학, 150, pp.31~62 (2020)
  11. 박근배, "경남방언 ‘카다’의 실현 양상에 대하여", 방언학, 20, pp.267~286 (2014)
  12. 서성교, "현대 한국어 접속어미 ‘-니까’의 인지·화용론적 연구시론", 정보과학회논문지, 10, pp.460~475 (1998)
  13. 서재극, "慶北方言「칸다」에 對한 宿題", 어문학, 5, pp.95~100 (1959)
  14. 서정수, "“하-”와 “되-”에 대하여", 어학연구, 27(3), pp.481~505 (1991)
  15. 안주호, "현대국어 연결어미 {-니까}의 문법적 특성과 형성 과정", 언어과학연구, 38, pp.71~91 (2006)
  16. 양명희, "현대국어 대용어에 대한 연구" (1998), 태학사
  17. 이상태, "국어 이음월의 통사·의미론적 연구" (1995), 형설출판사
  18. 이필영, "국어의 인용구문 연구" (1993), 탑출판사
  19. 정인호, "경상방언의 인용동사 {카다}의 형성에 대하여", 우리말글, 82, pp.149~168 (2019)
  20. 한길, "국어 종결어미 연구" (1991), 강원대학교 출판부
  21. 황병순, "‘-으니까’ 방언형의 형태론", 방언학, 15, pp.75~112 (2012)
  22. "언어정보나눔터"[URL]
  23. "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
  24. "한국 구비문학 대계", 한국학중앙연구원[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)