본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of UG in the L2 Acquisition of Long-Distance Binding

The Effect of UG in the L2 Acquisition of Long-Distance Binding

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study deals with two theoretical issues relevant to binding, namely argument/adjunct distinction and the finiteness domain effect, by investigating the interlanguage of 44 Korean native speakers learning English. Various types of LD binding were tested to see the effects of the contrasts between argument and adjunct anaphors and between finite and non-finite clause boundaries. The results show that Korean speakers allow LD binding significantly more freely when the anaphor is in an adjunct position, and they also do so when binding takes place over a non-finite clause. These results are rather surprising because in Korean the argument/adjunct distinction does not play a role for binding purposes, and because neither Korean nor English has the finiteness domain effect for LD binding. Accordingly, the result of this experimental study supports the view that interlanguage is UG-constrained.

Abstract

This study deals with two theoretical issues relevant to binding, namely argument/adjunct distinction and the finiteness domain effect, by investigating the interlanguage of 44 Korean native speakers learning English. Various types of LD binding were tested to see the effects of the contrasts between argument and adjunct anaphors and between finite and non-finite clause boundaries. The results show that Korean speakers allow LD binding significantly more freely when the anaphor is in an adjunct position, and they also do so when binding takes place over a non-finite clause. These results are rather surprising because in Korean the argument/adjunct distinction does not play a role for binding purposes, and because neither Korean nor English has the finiteness domain effect for LD binding. Accordingly, the result of this experimental study supports the view that interlanguage is UG-constrained.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. "S. R. 1986. The typology of anaphoric dependencies reflexives. In L. Hellan & K. Christensen Topics in Scandinavian Syntax"
  2. "E. 1989. Chinese Reflexivization. Paper presented at the 2nd Harbin Conference on Generative Grammar People's Republic of China.", Heilongjiang University
  3. "J. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word", pp.47~56
  4. "H. and K. Wexler. 1988. On the acquisition of agreement. Paper presented at GLOW"
  5. "H. and K. Wexler. 1992. Biunique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory", pp.1~43
  6. "N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky A Festschrift for Morris Halle"
  7. "N. 1980. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry", pp.1~46
  8. "N. 1981b. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht"
  9. "H. & P. Muysken. 1986. The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research", pp.1~29
  10. "N. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages", pp.141~177
  11. "Antecedents and blockers of long-distance reflexives", 27, pp.357~390 (1996)
  12. "& L.-M. Sung. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry", pp.1~22
  13. "V.J. 1990. Timed comprehension of binding in advanced L2 learners of English. Language Learning", pp.557~599
  14. ". 1984. Universals of Second Language Acquisition. Rowley"
  15. "Universal Grammar in the Second Language Amserdam"
  16. "M. 1991. Contextual determination of the anaphor", pronominal distinction In Koster, 1991, 77~119
  17. "S. 1985. More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research", pp.47~72
  18. "D.L. 1991. Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In Eubank", pp.351~374 (1991)
  19. "D. & E. Broselow. 1986. Second language acquisition of reflexive binding. Proceedings of NELS 16", pp.154~168
  20. "S. 1984. A universal in L2 acquisition based on a PBD theory. In Eckman et. al." (1984)
  21. "S. 1987. A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition. Dordrecht"
  22. "S. & S. Manuel. 1991. Age-dependent effects in language acquisition an evaluation of the critical period hypothesis. In Eubank" (1991)
  23. "A. 1991. Prepositions", j. & e. reuland (1991)
  24. "C. 1974. Les pronoms logophoricques. In Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris", pp.287~310
  25. "L. 1991. Containment and connectedness anaphors. In Koster" (1991)
  26. "M. 1990. A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research", pp.60~85
  27. "N. & S. Sigurjonsdotir. 1990. The development of Long-distance anaphora A cross-linguistic comparison with special reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition", pp.57~93
  28. "Ray. 1970. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge", MIT Press.
  29. "M. 1984. Subjective", logophoric bound anaphor zibun. In Papers from the Twentieth Regional Meeting University of Chicago, pp.illi(is.), ~
  30. "F. 1991. The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry", pp.287~314
  31. "K. 1991. The primacy condition of anaphora and pronominal variable binding. In Koster", pp.245~263 (1991)
  32. "University of Chicago Press.", ku
  33. "D. 1983. A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry", pp.723~730
  34. "J. 1984. Non-clause-bounded reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy", pp.211~241
  35. "J. 1991. Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language learning some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In Eubank" (1991)
  36. "P. 1984. On the distinction between argumental and non-argumental anaphors. In de Geest"
  37. "P. 1987. On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In Proceedings of NELS 17 University of Massachusetts", pp.483~
  38. "Long-distance reflexives without movement. Linguistic Inquiry", pp.671~680
  39. "L. and S. Franks. 1991. Relativized SUBJECT for reflexives. Paper presented at NELS 22 University of Delaware"
  40. "G. C. 1986. On anaphor binding in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory", pp.97~120
  41. "An argument structure perspective. In J. Koster & E. Reuland" (1991), Cambridge University Press.
  42. "L. 1990. Relativized Minimality. MIT press"
  43. "J. 1988. Second language acquisition and its relationship to Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics", pp.219~235
  44. "P. 1987. Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry", pp.445~481
  45. "Prosody, overt number markers and late acquisition of subject-verb agreement", Santa Monica California
  46. "L. 1987. Parameter setting and the development of pronouns and reflexives. In T. Roeper & E. Williams"
  47. "M. 1991. Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language", pp.211~239
  48. "M. 1993. Knowledge of reflexives in a second language. Amsterdam", Philadelphia, ~
  49. "Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form", 11, pp.206~234
  50. "Thrainsson. 1991. Long-distance reflexives and the typology of NP's. In Koster" (1991)
  51. "K. & M. Manzini. 1987. Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper and E. Williams", pp.41~
  52. "L. 1990. Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition", pp.121~133
  53. "D.-W. 1983. The extended binding theory of anaphors. Language Research", pp.169~192
  54. "J.-M. 1989. Long-distance anaphors in Korean and their cross-linguistic implications. In Papers from the Regional Meeting University of Chicago", illi(is.)
  55. "J.-M. 1989. Long-distance anaphors in Korean and their cross-linguistic implications. In Papers from the Regional Meeting University of Chicago", illi(is.)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)