본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

The Acquisition of Korean Reflexive Caki by Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study investigates acquisition of the Korean long-distance binding anaphor caki by heritage speakers of Korean, compared to English-speaking L2 learners of Korean and Korean native speakers. In English, a reflexive should be locally bound by its antecedent (e.g., Johni thinks that [Billj likes himself*i/j], whereas it can be bound either by a local antecedent or a long-distance antecedent in languages like Korean (e.g. Johni-un [Billj-i cakii/j-lul cohaha-n-ta]-ko sayngkakha-n-ta). An experimental study using a sentence-picture matching judgment test with auditory stimuli was conducted with 32 heritage speakers, 20 English-speaking L2 learners, and 14 native speakers of Korean, comparing accuracy scores of judgments. The results indicated overall native-like competence throughout different oral proficiency scales in a range from ILR 2 (85% accuracy) to ILR 4 (100% accuracy), still obtaining statistically significant correlations between proficiency scores and individual, as well as mean accuracy scores. Comparing heritage speakers and L2 learners, a similar pattern was found in both groups for long-distance binding conditions, correctly accepting the long-distance antecedent in matched conditions and correctly rejecting the long-distance antecedent in unmatched conditions, with slightly higher accuracy scores for heritage speakers. However, differences were found in local-binding conditions. Heritage speakers accepted the local antecedent only 40% of the time in matched conditions, similar to native speakers, whereas L2 learners accepted the local antecedent 70% of the time even though both groups correctly rejected the local antecedent in unmatched conditions. The results of the study add to the pool of evidence showing the advantages of heritage speakers in the acquisition of syntax in SLA.

Abstract

This study investigates acquisition of the Korean long-distance binding anaphor caki by heritage speakers of Korean, compared to English-speaking L2 learners of Korean and Korean native speakers. In English, a reflexive should be locally bound by its antecedent (e.g., Johni thinks that [Billj likes himself*i/j], whereas it can be bound either by a local antecedent or a long-distance antecedent in languages like Korean (e.g. Johni-un [Billj-i cakii/j-lul cohaha-n-ta]-ko sayngkakha-n-ta). An experimental study using a sentence-picture matching judgment test with auditory stimuli was conducted with 32 heritage speakers, 20 English-speaking L2 learners, and 14 native speakers of Korean, comparing accuracy scores of judgments. The results indicated overall native-like competence throughout different oral proficiency scales in a range from ILR 2 (85% accuracy) to ILR 4 (100% accuracy), still obtaining statistically significant correlations between proficiency scores and individual, as well as mean accuracy scores. Comparing heritage speakers and L2 learners, a similar pattern was found in both groups for long-distance binding conditions, correctly accepting the long-distance antecedent in matched conditions and correctly rejecting the long-distance antecedent in unmatched conditions, with slightly higher accuracy scores for heritage speakers. However, differences were found in local-binding conditions. Heritage speakers accepted the local antecedent only 40% of the time in matched conditions, similar to native speakers, whereas L2 learners accepted the local antecedent 70% of the time even though both groups correctly rejected the local antecedent in unmatched conditions. The results of the study add to the pool of evidence showing the advantages of heritage speakers in the acquisition of syntax in SLA.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Au, T., "Overhearing a language during childhood", Psychological Science, 13, pp.238~243 (2002)
  2. Bley-Vroman, R., "The logical problem of foreign language learning", Linguistic Analysis, 20, pp.3~49 (1990)
  3. 최광일, "재귀대명사의 다의성 해소과정: 안구운동 분석", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 19(4), pp.263~277 (2007), 한국인지및생물심리학회
  4. Chomsky, N., "Rules and Representations" (1980), Columbia University Press
  5. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Dordrecht: Foris Publications
  6. Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use" (1986), Praeger
  7. DeKeyser, R, "The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, pp.499~533 (2000)
  8. DeKeysr, R., "Implicit and explicit learning,”, In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition", pp.313~348 (2003), Blackwell
  9. Hyltenstam, K., "Maturational constraints in SLA, In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition", pp.539~588 (2003), Blackwell
  10. Kang, B-M, "문법과 언어 사용 : 코퍼스에 기반한 재귀사 ‘자기, 자신, 자기자신’의 기능 분석을 중심으로 (Grammar and the use of language: Korean reflexives ‘caki,’ ‘casin,’ and‘caki-casin)", 국어학, 31, pp.165~204 (1998)
  11. Kanno, K., "Relationships between prior language-learning experience and variation in the linguistic profiles of advanced English-speaking learners of Japanese, In Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging", pp.165~180 (2008), Routledge
  12. Kim, J-H., "Binding interpretation of anaphors in Korean heritage speakers", Language Acquisition, 16(1), pp.3~35 (2009)
  13. Kim, J-H., "Dominant language influence in acquisition and attrition of binding: Interpretation of the Korean reflexive caki", Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, pp.73~84 (2010)
  14. Young-Geun Lee, "Variation of the Linguistic Profiles of Advanced English-Speaking Learners of Korean", 어학연구, 41(2), pp.437~456 (2005), 언어교육원
  15. Sun-Young Lee, "Linguistic Correlates of Proficiency in Korean as a Second Language.", 어학연구, 45(2), pp.319~348 (2009), 언어교육원
  16. Lee, S-Y., "Linguistic Correlates of Proficiency in L2 learners and heritage speakers of Korean", Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum (SLRF) (2010)
  17. Long, M. H., "Maturational constraints on language development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, pp.251~285 (1990)
  18. Montrul, S., "Incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers: Chronological age or interface vulnerability?", Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp.99~310 (2008), Cascadilla Press
  19. Montrul, S., "Dominant language transfer in Spanish L2 learners and heritage speakers", Special issue of Second Language Research, 26, pp.293~327 (2010)
  20. Montrul, S., "How similar are L2 learners and heritage speakers? Spanish clitics and word order", Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, pp.73~84 (2010)
  21. Montrul, S., "Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences an similarities", Second Language Research, 21, pp.1~51 (2005)
  22. Polinsky, M., "American Russian: Language loss meets language acquisition", Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (1995)
  23. Polinsky, M, "Russian gender under incomplete acquisition", The Heritage Language Journal, 6(1) (2008)
  24. Thomas, Margaret, "The interpretation of English reflexive pronouns by non-native speakers", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, pp.281~303 (1989)
  25. Valdes, G., "Spanish for native speakers, In AATSP professional development series handbook for teachers K-16 (Vol.1)" (2000), Harcourt College Publishers

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)