영국 극작가들의 여성관 연구 - 셰익스피어, 드라이든 그리고 쇼를 중심으로
Women in Shakespeare, Dryden and Shaw
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to compare viewpoints on women in the works of Shakespeare, Dryden and Shaw. These three playwrights wrote at different times - the Renaissance, Neo-classical and Victorian Periods - with different ideas about women. However, they all wrote plays based on Cleopatra's story, so their ideas on women can be revealed by comparison of their Cleopatras. Shakespeare had two viewpoints on women, one was conservative and the other was progressive. His Cleopatra is very aggressive and active, but she did not overcome the challenge of succeeding in a man's world. Shakespeare accepted women's positive aspects but refused too much challenge for his society's safety and well-being. Dryden, with a conservative viewpoint on women, created a Cleopatra who was quite different from the historical one. His Cleopatra was very passive and submissive, which were considered as ideal women's qualities at that time. Shaw presented the development of Cleopatra from a girl to a queen in his work. He believed that women's qualities could be progressive, and that women could even be better than men if they were educated. He had positive ideas about women and acknowledged their possibilities. In conclusion, we can see three playwrights' women in their plays. Shakespeare's Cleopatra was progressive as well as traditional. Dryden's Cleopatra was a traditional one who was quite different from an original one. Shaw had a progressive idea of women, so his Cleopatra showed possibilities and potentials as a queen as well as a woman.
Abstract
This article aims to compare viewpoints on women in the works of Shakespeare, Dryden and Shaw. These three playwrights wrote at different times - the Renaissance, Neo-classical and Victorian Periods - with different ideas about women. However, they all wrote plays based on Cleopatra's story, so their ideas on women can be revealed by comparison of their Cleopatras. Shakespeare had two viewpoints on women, one was conservative and the other was progressive. His Cleopatra is very aggressive and active, but she did not overcome the challenge of succeeding in a man's world. Shakespeare accepted women's positive aspects but refused too much challenge for his society's safety and well-being. Dryden, with a conservative viewpoint on women, created a Cleopatra who was quite different from the historical one. His Cleopatra was very passive and submissive, which were considered as ideal women's qualities at that time. Shaw presented the development of Cleopatra from a girl to a queen in his work. He believed that women's qualities could be progressive, and that women could even be better than men if they were educated. He had positive ideas about women and acknowledged their possibilities. In conclusion, we can see three playwrights' women in their plays. Shakespeare's Cleopatra was progressive as well as traditional. Dryden's Cleopatra was a traditional one who was quite different from an original one. Shaw had a progressive idea of women, so his Cleopatra showed possibilities and potentials as a queen as well as a woman.
참고문헌 (34)
- Dryden, John, "All for Love or The World Well Lost. Famous Plays of the Restoration and Eighteenth Century" (1933), Modern Library
- Shakespeare, William, "Antony and Cleopatra" (1977), Methuen & co. Ltd
- Shaw, G, "Selected Plays of Bernard Shaw" (1948), The Vail-Ballou Press Inc
- 슐라미스 파이어스톤, "성의 변증법" (1993), 풀빛
- 용문식, "Dryden의 Shakespeare 작품 개작에 관한 연구-Troilus and Cressida를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1988
- 죤 스튜어트 밀, "여성의 예속" (1991), 이대출판부
- 케롤 C.골드, "지배로 부터의 자유" (1987), 한국여성개발원
- Adelman,Janet, "The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra" (1973), Yale UP
- Barton, Anne, "Essays, Mainly Shakespearean" (1994), Cambridge UP
- Berst,Charles A., "Bernard Shaw and The Art of Drama" (1973), University of Illinois Press
- Berst, Charles A., "Shaw and Religion" (1981), Pennsylvania State UP
- Brown, Laura, "English Dramatic Form 1660-1760" (1981), Yale UP
- Canfield, J. Douglas, "The Jewel of Great Price: Mutability and in Dryden's All for love", pp.36~61 (1975), E. L. H
- Chesterton,G.K., "George Bernard Shaw" (1956), Hill
- Dash,Irene.G., "Wooing,Weeding and Power:Women in Shakespeare's Plays" (1981), Columbia UP
- Dollimore, Jonathan, "Radical Tragedy" (1984), The Harvester Press Ltd
- Dreher, D. E., "Domination & Defiance. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986. Dunsinberre, Juliet. Shakespeare and The Nature of Women" (1975), Macmillan
- Edward,Philip, "Shakespeare:A Writer's Progress" (1986), Oxford UP
- French, Marilyn, "Antony and Cleopatra” Antony and Cleopatra", pp.262~278 (1994), Macmillan
- Gassner, Gohn, "Masters of Drama" (1954), Dover Publications Inc
- Jardine,Liza, "Still Harping on Daughters" (1983), Harvester Wheatsheaf
- Jose,Nicholas, "Ideas of The Restoration in English Literature 1660-71" (1984), Harvard UP
- Kramer,D.B., "The Imperial Dryden" (1994), University of Georgia Press
- Lenz, "The Woman's Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare" (1980), University of Illinois Press
- Marshall,Geoffrey, "Restoration Serious Drama" (1938), University of Oklahoma Press
- Neely, C. T., "Broken Nupticals in Shakespeare's Plays. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1985. Nicoll, Allardyce. A History of Restoration Drama 1660-1700" (1985), Cambridge UP
- Novy, Marianne, "Love's Argument: Gender Relations in Shakespeare" (1984), Chape Hill University of North Carolina Press
- Ruskin, John, "Sesame and Lilies" (1902), Homewood Publishing Co
- Scouten A. H., "Introduction Restoration and 18 -Century Drama", pp.1~15 (1980), Macmillan
- Shaw,G.B., "Intelligent Women's Guide to Socialism, Capitalism, Sovietism and Fascism" (1949), Constable
- Smith,David Nichol, "John Dryden" (1966), Cambridge UP
- Stone,Lawrence, "The Family,Sex and Marriage in England 1500-1800" (1990), Penguin Books
- Suckling, Norman, "Dryden in Egypt: Reflections on All for Love All for Love", pp.46~54 (1968), Prentice-Hall Inc
- Waith, E. M., "The Herculean Hero All for Love", pp.72~82 (1968), Prentice-Hall Inc