셰익스피어의 『안토니와 클레오파트라』와 뮤지컬 <클레오파트라>(2008)의 비교 연구
A Comparative Study on Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra and the Musical, Kleopatra(2008)
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I compare the portrayal of Cleopatra in the musical, Kleopatra(2008) with that in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra. The Egyptian queen has fascinated artists and writers as an attractive subject. While descriptions of Cleopatra in their works have shown extreme divergences, the image as which she has been understood up to now is the most celebrated stereotype of the ‘goddess’ and ‘whore’. Cleopatra has been not only a powerful strategic political leader but also a seductive femme fatal who led to historic heroes' tragic destructions. I assume that the ambivalence of the ‘goddess’ and ‘whore’ that is observed in the figure of Cleopatra originates from Shakespeare's representation of her in his play, Antony and Cleopatra. Although many artists and writers after Shakespeare have created a variety of Cleopatras, interestingly, they can be categorized into either the goddess or the whore from Shakespeare's ambivalent representation. In this paper, holding Shakespeare’s ambivalence as a hinge, I interpret Kleopatra as a text to expand and reinforce the goddessness, contrasting it with Dryden’s All for Love, Shaw’s Caesar and Cleopatra and Mankiewicz’s Cleopatra which I regard as texts which build up the whoreness. Through texts which curtail and remove the queen’s power, the Western imperialists have formed discourses, which develop into the myth to contain Cleopatra in the name of ‘whore’. However, the musical born in Eastern Europe with the advent of the new millennium presents certain possibilities to become a counter-discourse to subvert the Western myth. I demonstrate that the plot of the musical highlights Cleopatra’s ambition, suffering and struggle as a queen, which ultimately strengthens her ‘goddess’ image. In addition, the musical represents other female characters anew who were marginalized in the history and it also includes strong denunciation on the Western imperialists by creating efficient stage devices. The findings from the comparative study suggest that the musical Kleopatra releases Cleopatra from the dishonorable title of a 'whore' and reinstates Cleopatra to her throne as it becomes a counter-discourse which frustrates the Western imperialist desire.
Abstract
In this paper, I compare the portrayal of Cleopatra in the musical, Kleopatra(2008) with that in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra. The Egyptian queen has fascinated artists and writers as an attractive subject. While descriptions of Cleopatra in their works have shown extreme divergences, the image as which she has been understood up to now is the most celebrated stereotype of the ‘goddess’ and ‘whore’. Cleopatra has been not only a powerful strategic political leader but also a seductive femme fatal who led to historic heroes' tragic destructions. I assume that the ambivalence of the ‘goddess’ and ‘whore’ that is observed in the figure of Cleopatra originates from Shakespeare's representation of her in his play, Antony and Cleopatra. Although many artists and writers after Shakespeare have created a variety of Cleopatras, interestingly, they can be categorized into either the goddess or the whore from Shakespeare's ambivalent representation. In this paper, holding Shakespeare’s ambivalence as a hinge, I interpret Kleopatra as a text to expand and reinforce the goddessness, contrasting it with Dryden’s All for Love, Shaw’s Caesar and Cleopatra and Mankiewicz’s Cleopatra which I regard as texts which build up the whoreness. Through texts which curtail and remove the queen’s power, the Western imperialists have formed discourses, which develop into the myth to contain Cleopatra in the name of ‘whore’. However, the musical born in Eastern Europe with the advent of the new millennium presents certain possibilities to become a counter-discourse to subvert the Western myth. I demonstrate that the plot of the musical highlights Cleopatra’s ambition, suffering and struggle as a queen, which ultimately strengthens her ‘goddess’ image. In addition, the musical represents other female characters anew who were marginalized in the history and it also includes strong denunciation on the Western imperialists by creating efficient stage devices. The findings from the comparative study suggest that the musical Kleopatra releases Cleopatra from the dishonorable title of a 'whore' and reinstates Cleopatra to her throne as it becomes a counter-discourse which frustrates the Western imperialist desire.
참고문헌 (15)
- "<클레오파트라>. 김장섭 연출. 유니버설아트센터, 서울. 2008. 10", ~ (2008)
- Bamber, Linda, "Gender and Genre in: Modern Critical Interpretations: Antony and Cleopatra", pp.109~135 (1988), Chelsea House Publishers
- Bernstein, Matthew, "Introduction in: Visions of the East: Orientalism in Film", pp.1~18 (1997), Rutgers UP
- Bogle, Donald, "Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies and Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films" (2004), Continuum
- Joseph L. Mankiewicz, "Cleopatra" (1963), Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation
- Dryden, John, "All for Love; or, The World Well Lost. Six Restoration Plays" (1959), hton Mifflin
- Greenblatt, Stephen, "Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare" (1980), U of Chicago P
- Hamer, Mary, "Signs of Cleopatra: History, Politics, Representation" (1993), Routledge
- Hamer, Mary, "Timeless Histories: A British Dream of Cleopatra in: Visions of the East: Orientalism in Film", pp.269~291 (1997), Rutgers UP
- Lee, Kyung-Won, "Domesticating the ‘Infinite Variety’: Shakespeare’s Cleopatra and the Discourse of Orientalism", Shakespeare Review, 28, pp.107~133 (1996)
- Loomba, Ania, "Gender, Race, Renaissance Drama" (1989), Manchester UP
- Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, "Feminism Without Borders" (2003), Duke UP
- Mulvey, Laura, "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema in: Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Reading", pp.746~757 (1992), Oxford UP
- Shakespeare, William, "Antony and Cleopatra" (1991), Routledge
- Shaw, G. Bernard, "Caesar and Cleopatra. Three Plays for Puritans" (1946), Penguin Books
