Syntactic Structures of -Ko Coordinate Constructions
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper I investigate the phrase structures of the -ko coordinate constructions in Korean. To do it, I first examine two kinds of the -ko constructions, -koC and -koS constructions. I present the observed facts that when the nonfinal conjunct is overtly tense-marked or the final conjunct has its own independent, specified subject, the two conjuncts yield the parallel reading, constituting a -koC construction, and when any overt tense marker is absent in the nonfinal conjunct, conjuncts yield the nonparallel reading, forming a -koS construction. However, even when the nonfinal conjunct is not overtly tense-marked, conjuncts can yield the parallel reading if there is a parallelism in semantic relation between them. I show that the two -ko constructions are different syntactically as well as semantically. Based on those syntactic differences, I suggest phrase structures for the two -ko constructions. Among the three main structures for the coordinate construction presented in the literature, the flat multiple branching structure, the spec-complement structure, and the adjunction structure, I argue for the hypothesis that the second is the structure for the -koC construction, while the third is the structure for the -koS construction.
Abstract
In this paper I investigate the phrase structures of the -ko coordinate constructions in Korean. To do it, I first examine two kinds of the -ko constructions, -koC and -koS constructions. I present the observed facts that when the nonfinal conjunct is overtly tense-marked or the final conjunct has its own independent, specified subject, the two conjuncts yield the parallel reading, constituting a -koC construction, and when any overt tense marker is absent in the nonfinal conjunct, conjuncts yield the nonparallel reading, forming a -koS construction. However, even when the nonfinal conjunct is not overtly tense-marked, conjuncts can yield the parallel reading if there is a parallelism in semantic relation between them. I show that the two -ko constructions are different syntactically as well as semantically. Based on those syntactic differences, I suggest phrase structures for the two -ko constructions. Among the three main structures for the coordinate construction presented in the literature, the flat multiple branching structure, the spec-complement structure, and the adjunction structure, I argue for the hypothesis that the second is the structure for the -koC construction, while the third is the structure for the -koS construction.
참고문헌 (31)
- Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Culicover,P, "One more can of beer", Linguistic Inquiry, 1, pp.366~369 (1970)
- Culicover, P, "Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.195~217 (1997)
- Goldsmith,J, "A principled exception to the coordinate structure constraint", CLS, 21, pp.133~143 (1985)
- Haspelmath,M, "Coordination. Language typology and linguistic description. 2 edition" (2000), CUP
- Johannessen,J, "Coordination: A minimalist approach", 박사, pp.1993
- Johannessen,J, "Coordination" (1998), Oxford Univ. Press
- Johnson,K, "Restoring exotic coordinations to normalcy", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.97~156 (2002)
- Kayne,R, "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), The MIT Press
- Kayne,R, "Why is syntax antisymmetric?", Handout presented at the conference on Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word orders (2009), Newcastle. England
- Kwon,N, "Syntactic and semantic mismatches in the Korean ko-construction", Proceedings of WCCFL, 23, pp.514~527 (2004)
- What does coordination look like in a head-final language?, "Kwon, N", Paper presented at ICLC 9 in Seoul, ~ (2005)
- Lakoff,G, "Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint", CLS, 22, pp.152~167 (1986)
- Morro,A, "Dynamic Antisymmetry" (2000), The MIT Press
- Coordinate structure and X-bar theory, "Munn, A", McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 121~140, pp.4-1 (1987)
- Munn, A, "Coordinate structure and X-bar theory, and parasitic gaps", 석사, pp.1987
- Munn,A, "A null operator analysis of ATB gaps", The Linguistic Review, 9, pp.1~26 (1992)
- Munn,A, "Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structure", 박사, pp.1993
- Postal,P, "The status of the coordinate structure constraint", New York Univ, ~ (1993)
- Ross,J, "Constraints on variables in syntax", 박사, pp.1967
- Rudnitskaja,E, "Syntactic properties of the Altaic structure in Korean", Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 51, pp.179~198 (1998)
- Scrambling as semantically vacuous A' movement, "Saito,M", ~ (1986)
- Shmerling,S, "Asymmetric conjunction and roles of conversation. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts", pp.211~231 (1975), Academic Press
- Takano,Y, "Coordination of verbs and two types of verbal inflection", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.168~178 (2004)
- Williams,E, "The ATB theory of parasitic gaps", The Linguistic Review, 6, pp.265~279 (1990)
- Adjunction, coordination, and their theoretical consequences, "Yi,E", Paper presented at the ICKL, Univ. of London, ~ (1994)
- Korean verbal inflection and checking theory, "Yoon, J", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 251~270, pp.22 (1994)
- Yoon, J, "Lexical integrity and the morphosyntax of verbal inflection in Korean coordination", 석사, pp.1994
- Yoon,J, "Coordination (A)symmetry", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 7, pp.3~30 (1997)
- Zhang,N, "On the configurational issue of coordination", Language and Linguistics, 7, pp.175~223 (2006)
- Zoerner,C, "Coordination: The syntax of &P", 박사, pp.1995