르네상스 시대의 내적 자아와 셰익스피어의 비극적 인물들
The Inner Self in the Renaissance and Shakespeare's Tragic Characters
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Despite postmodern literary critics’ anti-essential conception of man in the Renaissance, Renaissance thinkers and artists believed in the nature of man and embodied such a belief in their works. Staying away from our contemporary ideological polemics on the human nature, this paper examines the inner self in the Renaissance in relation to Shakespeare’s four tragic characters: Hamlet, Cordelia, Romeo, and Juliet. The inner self was not a new concept in the Renaissance period. What was new was the attitude and direction of the concept. As a political power became concentrated on the kings of the modern nations, prudence seemed to be the courtiers’ best policy for political survival. The Reformation also put extra pressure on the contemporaries, who sometimes had to conceal their religious convictions for the sake of personal safety. On the other hand, disillusioned by dissembling in the court and the Reformed world, people desired the virtue of sincerity, which was also strongly supported by the Reformers who believed in the human emotion overt reason. Keenly aware of the differences between inner and outer, Shakespeare’s tragic characters criticize dissembling, a strategy of prudence as a representation of the self. And they also give priority to ‘that within.’ Their sincerity as an inner power looks insignificant, but it eventually causes the corrupt society to fall down and helps the society to recover a healthy state thanks to their tragic sacrifice. Postmodernists’ idea of the self in the Renaissance is a projection of their own self-image. The completely autonomous self demystified by the postmodern literary critics was the idea of man espoused by liberal humanism, which was actually unknown to the Renaissance men. A study of the inner self in the Renaissance as related to Shakespeare allows us to discover truth in its own historical contexts and to reflect on our modern or postmodern life.
Abstract
Despite postmodern literary critics’ anti-essential conception of man in the Renaissance, Renaissance thinkers and artists believed in the nature of man and embodied such a belief in their works. Staying away from our contemporary ideological polemics on the human nature, this paper examines the inner self in the Renaissance in relation to Shakespeare’s four tragic characters: Hamlet, Cordelia, Romeo, and Juliet. The inner self was not a new concept in the Renaissance period. What was new was the attitude and direction of the concept. As a political power became concentrated on the kings of the modern nations, prudence seemed to be the courtiers’ best policy for political survival. The Reformation also put extra pressure on the contemporaries, who sometimes had to conceal their religious convictions for the sake of personal safety. On the other hand, disillusioned by dissembling in the court and the Reformed world, people desired the virtue of sincerity, which was also strongly supported by the Reformers who believed in the human emotion overt reason. Keenly aware of the differences between inner and outer, Shakespeare’s tragic characters criticize dissembling, a strategy of prudence as a representation of the self. And they also give priority to ‘that within.’ Their sincerity as an inner power looks insignificant, but it eventually causes the corrupt society to fall down and helps the society to recover a healthy state thanks to their tragic sacrifice. Postmodernists’ idea of the self in the Renaissance is a projection of their own self-image. The completely autonomous self demystified by the postmodern literary critics was the idea of man espoused by liberal humanism, which was actually unknown to the Renaissance men. A study of the inner self in the Renaissance as related to Shakespeare allows us to discover truth in its own historical contexts and to reflect on our modern or postmodern life.
참고문헌 (14)
- Balty, David G, "The Theological Bard: Shakespeare and the Evolving English Reformation" (2005), Indiana University of Pennsylvania
- Guss, Donald L, "The Power of Selfhood: Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Milton’s Samson", Modern Language Quarterly, 54.4(93), pp.483~511
- Harbage, Alfred, gen, "William Shakespeare: the Complete Works" (1969), Viking
- Herman, Peter C, "‘O, ’tis a gallant King’: Shakespeare’s Henry V and the Crisis of the 1590s, In Tudor Political Culture", pp.204~25 (1995), Cambridge UP
- Holbrook, Peter, "Shakespeare’s Individualism" (2010), Cambridge UP
- Kastan, David Scott, "Introduction: Reading Shakespeare Historically, In Shakespeare After Theory", pp.15~22, Routledge
- Low, Anthony, "Aspects of Subjectivity: Society and Individualism from the Middle Ages to Shakespeare and Milton" (2003), Duquesne UP
- Martin, John Jeffries, "Myths of Renaissance Individualism" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
- Maus, Katharine Eisanman, "Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance" (1995), U of Chicago P
- McAlindon, Tom, "Shakespeare Minus ‘Theory.’" (2004), Ashgate Publishing Company
- Mousley, Andy, "Hamlet and the Politics of Individualism, In New Essays on Hamlet" (1994), AMS
- Rhodes, Neil, "Hamlet and Humanism, In Early Modern English Drama: A Critical Companion", pp.120~29 (2006), Oxford UP
- Shakespeare, William, "The Complete Works" (1977), Viking
- Wells, Headlam Robin, "Shakespeare’s Humanism" (2005), Cambridge UP