본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 속성 동격 구문: Chomsky(2013)의 명칭 결정 알고리즘(labeling algorithm)의 한 증거

The so-called attributive appositional construction in Korean: a case supporting the labeling algorithm of Chomsky (2013)

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

We propose in this paper the structure of the so-called attributive appositional construction in Korean, which consists of two noun phrases without involving any grammatical element. According to this structure, the two noun phrases form a small clause, in which the predicate noun phrase moves just before the subject noun phrase. In other words, we claim that the construction in question undergoes a predicate inversion. Our proposal accounts for the fact that the first noun phrase has a predicate function. It also accounts for why the genitive Case marker “uy” cannot appear on the first noun phrase: a nominal which is dependent on a noun head can usually have the genitive Case marker in Korea, but the first noun phrase, a predicate, is not dependent on the second noun phrase, a subject. We also try to answer to the question: Why the predicate noun phrase should move? We claim that it is due to the labeling algorithm of Chomsky (2013), according to which one of the two constituents of a small clause should move in order that the small clause gets labeled. On the other hand, there are some pieces of evidence that the second noun phrase is the head of the entire structure of the so-called attributive appositional construction. This is exactly what the labeling algorithm predicts: because it is the first noun phrase, a predicate, that moves, the label of the small clause would be that of the remaining second noun phrase, a subject. So, the so-called attributive appositional construction in Korean provides a case supporting the labeling algorithm of Chomsky (2013).

Abstract

We propose in this paper the structure of the so-called attributive appositional construction in Korean, which consists of two noun phrases without involving any grammatical element. According to this structure, the two noun phrases form a small clause, in which the predicate noun phrase moves just before the subject noun phrase. In other words, we claim that the construction in question undergoes a predicate inversion. Our proposal accounts for the fact that the first noun phrase has a predicate function. It also accounts for why the genitive Case marker “uy” cannot appear on the first noun phrase: a nominal which is dependent on a noun head can usually have the genitive Case marker in Korea, but the first noun phrase, a predicate, is not dependent on the second noun phrase, a subject. We also try to answer to the question: Why the predicate noun phrase should move? We claim that it is due to the labeling algorithm of Chomsky (2013), according to which one of the two constituents of a small clause should move in order that the small clause gets labeled. On the other hand, there are some pieces of evidence that the second noun phrase is the head of the entire structure of the so-called attributive appositional construction. This is exactly what the labeling algorithm predicts: because it is the first noun phrase, a predicate, that moves, the label of the small clause would be that of the remaining second noun phrase, a subject. So, the so-called attributive appositional construction in Korean provides a case supporting the labeling algorithm of Chomsky (2013).

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김영희, "한국어 제시어의 문법", 주시경학보, 4, pp.114~138 (1989)
  2. 김영희, "한국어 통사론을 위한 논의" (1998), 한국문화사
  3. 서정수, "국어 문법 (수정증보판)" (1995), 한양대학교출판원
  4. 김인균, "동격 명사구의 유형 및 범위와 구조", 우리말연구, (24), pp.59~86 (2009), 우리말학회
  5. 이선웅, "국어 동격 명사구의 개념과 유형", 어문학, (98), pp.159~185 (2007), 한국어문학회
  6. 홍용철, "융합이론과 격조사 분포", 생성문법연구, 4, pp.1~43 (1994)
  7. 홍용철, "한국어의 명사 확장범주", 언어, 31(4), pp.657~684 (2006), 한국언어학회
  8. 홍용철, "한국어의 후치 요소와 명사 확장 범주", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.743~768 (2008), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  9. 홍용철, "한국어 명사 외곽 수식어들의 어순과 명사구 구조", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.27~50 (2010), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  10. 홍용철, "소유격 표지 “의”의 분포와 본질", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.321~345 (2013), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  11. 홍용철, "두 가지 유형의 소위 한국어 동격 구문", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.281~306 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
  12. 홍용철, "명사구 내 보충어에의 격 표지 부재와 인접에 의한 가시성 조건 만족", 생성문법연구, 25(3), pp.603~629 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  13. Abels, K., "Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality, and Adposition Stranding", PhD, pp.2003
  14. Chomsky, N., "Barries" (1986), MIT Press
  15. Chomsky, N, "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  16. Grohmann, K., "Prolific Peripheries: A Radical View from the Left", PhD, pp.2000
  17. Kayne, R. S., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
  18. Moro, A., "Dynamic Antisymmetry: Movement as a Symmetry-Breaking Phenomenon", Studia Linguistica, 51(1), pp.50~76 (1997)
  19. Pesetsky, D., "Ken Hale: A Life on Language" (2001), MIT Press
  20. Rothstein, S., "The Syntactic Form of Predication", PhD, pp.1983
  21. Yoon, James Hye-Suk., "Japanes-Korean Linguistics 11", pp.34~50 (2002), CSLI Publications
  22. Yoon, James Hye-Suk., "Clitic and Affix Combination: Theoritical Perspectives", pp.239~283 (2005), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)