본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Anti-PCC Effects in Korean Double Relative Constructions and Their Implications

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Double relativization is possible in Korean, and it has been often studied with respect to the problem it poses to Island Constraints. In this paper, I examine double relativization in Korean from a different perspective, i.e., in terms of the Path Containment Condition (Pesetsky 1982), and discuss its implications. Based on the descriptive generalizations about double relativization possibilities of different grammatical functions in Korean, I show that paths in double relative constructions in Korean are generally crossed, i.e., they show Anti-PCC effects (Richards 1997). Granting that the (Anti-)PCC holds for paths formed by A’-movement, one implication of Anti-PCC effects in Korean DRCs is that they provide an argument for the standard movement analysis over the others such as the non-movement approach. The movement analysis, however, is left with the problem of dealing with CNPC violations as well as some counterexamples to the Anti-PCC, and the remainder of the paper is devoted to exploring possible solutions for them.

Abstract

Double relativization is possible in Korean, and it has been often studied with respect to the problem it poses to Island Constraints. In this paper, I examine double relativization in Korean from a different perspective, i.e., in terms of the Path Containment Condition (Pesetsky 1982), and discuss its implications. Based on the descriptive generalizations about double relativization possibilities of different grammatical functions in Korean, I show that paths in double relative constructions in Korean are generally crossed, i.e., they show Anti-PCC effects (Richards 1997). Granting that the (Anti-)PCC holds for paths formed by A’-movement, one implication of Anti-PCC effects in Korean DRCs is that they provide an argument for the standard movement analysis over the others such as the non-movement approach. The movement analysis, however, is left with the problem of dealing with CNPC violations as well as some counterexamples to the Anti-PCC, and the remainder of the paper is devoted to exploring possible solutions for them.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Allwood, Jens, "UMASD Occasional Papers in Linguistics II" (1976)
  2. Andersson, Lars-Gunnar, "Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages", pp.33~46 (1982), Almqvist and Wiksell
  3. Chen, Sherry Yong, "Double topicalization, I find really interesting" (2017), MIT
  4. Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  5. Chung, Sandra, "WH-agreement and ‘referentiality’ in Chamorro", Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.1~44 (1994)
  6. Cinque, Guglielmo, "Types of A′-Dependencies" (1990), MIT Press
  7. Engdahl, Elisabet, "Wh-constructions in Swedish and the relevance of subjacency", Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, pp.89~108 (1980), University of Ottawa Department of Linguistics
  8. Engdahl, Elisabet, "Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages", pp.151~174 (1982), Almqvist and Wiksell
  9. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, "More on extractability from quasi-NPs", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.665~670 (1981)
  10. Frazier, Lyn, "The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model", Cognition, 6, pp.1~34 (1978)
  11. Han, Chung-Hye, "Are there 'double relative clauses' in Korean", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.315~337 (2004)
  12. Han, Jong-Im, "Syntactic movement analysis of Korean relativization", Language Research, 28, pp.335~357 (1992)
  13. Hawkins, John, "Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across language", Language, 75, pp.224~285 (1999)
  14. Hofmeister, Peter, "Cognitive constraints and island effects", Language, 86, pp.366~415 (2010)
  15. Jang, Young-Jun, "Multiple subjects and characteristic property", Discourse and Cognition, 5, pp.99~116 (1998)
  16. Kang, Myoung-Yoon, "Linguistics in the morning calm, vol. 2", pp.347~362 (1988), Hanshin
  17. 김일규, "An experimental study on island effects related to“double relative clauses” in Korean", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.191~214 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  18. 김수연, "A Processing Approach to Complex NP Island Effects in Korean", Journal of Universal Language, 17(1), pp.81~107 (2016), 언어연구소
  19. Kitahara, Hisatsugu, "Target Alpha: A Unified Theory of Movement and Structure-building", Ph.D, pp.1994
  20. Kitahara, Hisatsugu, "Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 31" (1997), MIT Press
  21. Kluender, Robert, "Island Constraint", pp.223~258 (1992), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  22. Kluender, Robert, "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 29: The Limits of Syntax", pp.241~279 (1998), Academic Press
  23. Kluender, Robert, "Subjacency as a processing phenomenon", Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, pp.573~633 (1993)
  24. Kuno, Susumu, "Multiple wh-questions", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.463~488 (1972)
  25. Kuno, Susumu, "Subject and Topic", pp.418~444 (1976), Academic Press
  26. Kuno, Susumu, "Functional Syntax" (1987), University of Chicago Press
  27. Kwon, Nayoung., "Processing of Syntactic and Anaphoric Gap-filler Dependencies in Korean: Evidence from Self-paced Reading Time, ERP and Eye-tracking Experiments", Ph.D, pp.2008
  28. Maling, Joan, "The Nature of Syntactic Representation", pp.229~282 (1982), Springer
  29. Pesetsky, David, "Paths and Categories", Ph.D, pp.1982
  30. Richards, Novin, "What Moves Where When in Which Language?", Ph.D, pp.1997
  31. Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" (1990), MIT Press
  32. Ross, J. Robert, "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", Ph.D, pp.1967
  33. Rudin, Catherine, "On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.445~501 (1988)
  34. Sohn, Ho-Min, "Theme-prominence in Korean", Korean Linguistics: Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.2~9 (1980)
  35. Sorace, Antonella, "Gradience in linguistic data", Lingua, 115(11), pp.1497~1524 (2005)
  36. Sungki Suh, "The Distribution of Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean", 어학연구, 39(4), pp.839~857 (2003), 언어교육원
  37. Yoon, James H, "Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (2007)
  38. Yoon, Jeong-Me, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.369~382 (1989)
  39. 윤정미, "Aspect and Agentivity in Korean Multiple Subject Constructions", 생성문법연구, 19(2), pp.211~237 (2009), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  40. 윤정미, "Double Relativization in Korean - An Explanation Based on the Processing Approach to Island Effects", 언어, 36(1), pp.157~193 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  41. 윤정미, "Constructions Sharing Similar Restrictions with MSCs in Korean and the Processing Approach to Island Effects", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.377~411 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  42. 윤정미, "Double Relativitization of Different Grammatical Functions in Korean", 어학연구, 52(2), pp.247~282 (2016), 언어교육원
  43. 윤정미, "On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean", 언어연구, 35(3), pp.415~447 (2018), 언어정보연구소[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)