Adjunct Ellipsis in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores phrasal and clausal adjunct ellipsis observed in inter-sentential contexts in Korean. Close examination of an array of empirical facts reveals that adjunct ellipsis is widely attested in Korean and Japanese (cf. Oku 2016). Crucially, we look into ellipsis of a variety of adjunct phrases such as instrumental, locative and manner phrases. We then probe the ellipsis of adjunct clauses including causal, concessional, conditional and temporal clauses, paying close attention to mismatches in functional categories between the antecedent and the elided clause. In line with Lee’s (2014) claim that argument ellipsis is licensed as long as the lexical cores are identical, this empirical finding demonstrates that clausal adjunct ellipsis can be licensed despite functional mismatches between the antecedent and the unuttered clause. This further suggests that functional peripheries do not count in the computation of identity for ellipsis (cf. Lee and Park 2019). PF deletion is proposed as an account of the unrealized, understood adjunct clause.
Abstract
This paper explores phrasal and clausal adjunct ellipsis observed in inter-sentential contexts in Korean. Close examination of an array of empirical facts reveals that adjunct ellipsis is widely attested in Korean and Japanese (cf. Oku 2016). Crucially, we look into ellipsis of a variety of adjunct phrases such as instrumental, locative and manner phrases. We then probe the ellipsis of adjunct clauses including causal, concessional, conditional and temporal clauses, paying close attention to mismatches in functional categories between the antecedent and the elided clause. In line with Lee’s (2014) claim that argument ellipsis is licensed as long as the lexical cores are identical, this empirical finding demonstrates that clausal adjunct ellipsis can be licensed despite functional mismatches between the antecedent and the unuttered clause. This further suggests that functional peripheries do not count in the computation of identity for ellipsis (cf. Lee and Park 2019). PF deletion is proposed as an account of the unrealized, understood adjunct clause.
참고문헌 (33)
- Cheng, Hsu-Te Johnny, "Argument Ellipsis, Classifier Phrases, and the DP Parameter", Ph.D, pp.2013
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Collins, Chris, "Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. Vol. 77 of MIT Working Papers in Linguistics", pp.57~70 (2015), MITWPL
- Collins, Chris, "Adjunct deletion", Ms, pp.2015
- Collins, Chris, "Incomplete comparatives as ellipsis", Ms, pp.2017
- Fortin, Catherine R, "We need LF copying: A few good reason Why", Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 28), pp.87~95 (2011), Cascadilla Press
- Han, Chung-hye, "V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.1~47 (2007)
- Han, Chung-hye, "Null objects in Korean: experimental evidence for the argument ellipsis analysis" (2019), To appear in Linguistic Inquiry
- Kolokonte, Marina, "Bare argument ellipsis and polarity in Modern Greek", First Newcastle Postgraduate Conference in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. Newcastle University, United Kingdom (2006)
- Kuno, Susumu, "Principles of discourse deletion: Case studies from English, Russian and Japanese", Journal of Semantics, 1, pp.61~93 (1982)
- Landau, Idan, "Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis", Glossa, 3(1), pp.1~37 (2018)
- Larson, Richard, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- 이우승, "Argumental Gaps in Korean", 언어학, 22(1), pp.1~29 (2014), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 이우승, "Argument ellipsis vs. V-stranding VP ellipsis in Korean: Evidence from disjunction", 언어연구, 33(1), pp.1~20 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 이우승, "Resolution of Ellipsis in Stacked VPs", 영어학, 19(3), pp.309~324 (2019), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- Merchant, Jason, "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, Jason, "Swiping in Germanic", Proceedings from the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax (2002), John Benjamins
- Merchant, Jason, "Revisiting syntactic identity conditions", Paper presented at Workshop on Ellipsis (2005), University of California
- Oku, Satoshi, "A Theory of Selection and Reconstruction in the Minimalist Perspective", Ph.D, pp.1998
- Oku, Satoshi, "A note on ellipsis-resistant constituents", Nanzan Linguistics, 11, pp.56~70 (2016)
- Park, Myung-Kwan, "A Morpho-syntactic Study of Korean Verbal Inflection", Ph.D, pp.1994
- Potsdam, Eric, "Malagasy sluicing and its consequences for the identity requirement on ellipsis", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
- Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.203~227 (2007), 언어교육원
- Sakamoto, Yuta, "Disjunction as a new diagnostic for (argument) ellipsis", Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, pp.15~28 (2015), GLSA
- Sakamoto, Yuta, "Phases and argument ellipsis in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25, pp.243~274 (2016)
- Sato, Yosuke, "Argument ellipsis in Javanese and voice agreement", Studia Linguistica, 69 (2015)
- Sener, Serkan, "Argument ellipsis in Japanese and Turkish", Paper presented at the sixth Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics held at Nagoya University (2009)
- Simpson, Andrew, "Argument ellipsis and the licensing of covert nominals in Bangla", Hindi and Malayalam. Lingua, 134, pp.103~128 (2013)
- Takahashi, Daiko, "The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics", pp.394~422 (2008), OUP
- Takahashi, Daiko, "Quantificational null objects and argument ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.307~326 (2008)
- Yoshida, Masaya, "Phases and ellipsis", The paper presented at 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics(WCCFL 27), UCLA, Los Angels, CA (2008)
- Yoshida, Masaya, "Sometimes smaller is better: Sluicing, gapping and semantic identity", Proceedings of NELS 36 (2006), GLSA
- Yoshida, Masaya, "Antecedent contained sluicing", Ms, pp.2007