본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

EPP-효과와 개정표찰화이론

EPP-effect and Revised Labeling Theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study concerns what is called the EPP-effect in natural languages, which has been so far assumed to be perfectly captured by the labeling algorithm(LA) within Chomsky's (2013, 2015) labeling theory(LT). However, it is detected in this study that there still exist so many exceptional EPP-related phenomena, including the pure EPP-effect, that cannot be explained without the PSR: S → DP VP under LT. Chomsky (2013, 2015) also implicitly ascribes the pure EPP-effect to the successive-cyclic movement, ensured by Moro’s (2000) dynamic asymmetry, which, however, comes with more complexities with regard to the feature-agreement system that LA depends upon. Hence, this study argues for a revised labeling theory, so called RLT, suggesting some new principles such as in (23), (29), (32), and (52) under the extended feature-inheritance principle previously proposed in (22). RLT proves that all types of movement for the EPP-effect are triggered only by Agree-feature agreement attributed to LA. Consequently, it comes to light that there is no pure EPP-effect, no successive-cyclic movement, no Moro’s dynamic asymmetry, and hence no residue PSR under the RLT-framework of this study.

Abstract

This study concerns what is called the EPP-effect in natural languages, which has been so far assumed to be perfectly captured by the labeling algorithm(LA) within Chomsky's (2013, 2015) labeling theory(LT). However, it is detected in this study that there still exist so many exceptional EPP-related phenomena, including the pure EPP-effect, that cannot be explained without the PSR: S → DP VP under LT. Chomsky (2013, 2015) also implicitly ascribes the pure EPP-effect to the successive-cyclic movement, ensured by Moro’s (2000) dynamic asymmetry, which, however, comes with more complexities with regard to the feature-agreement system that LA depends upon. Hence, this study argues for a revised labeling theory, so called RLT, suggesting some new principles such as in (23), (29), (32), and (52) under the extended feature-inheritance principle previously proposed in (22). RLT proves that all types of movement for the EPP-effect are triggered only by Agree-feature agreement attributed to LA. Consequently, it comes to light that there is no pure EPP-effect, no successive-cyclic movement, no Moro’s dynamic asymmetry, and hence no residue PSR under the RLT-framework of this study.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김용석, "Noam Chomsky의 강력최소주의와 표찰화이론" (2021), 글로벌콘텐츠
  2. 김용석, "역순환성과 탐색가시성조건", 생성문법연구, 33(1), pp.49~74 (2023), 한국생성문법학회
  3. Borer. Hagit, "In Name Only. Structuring Sense, Vol. I" (2005), OUP
  4. Chomsky, Noam, "Syntactic Structures" (1957), Mouton
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use" (1986), Praeger
  7. Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  8. Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  9. Chomsky, Noam, "Structures and Beyond--The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, Vol 3", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.291~321 (2008), MIT Press
  11. Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  12. Chomsky, Noam, "Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti", pp.1~16 (2015), Benjamin
  13. Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go", Gengo Kenkyu, 160, pp.1~41 (2021)
  14. Chomsky, Noam, "The Miracle Creed and SMT", ms, pp.2023
  15. Chomsky, Noam. 2023b, "Working toward the Strong Interpretation of SMT" (2023)
  16. Embrick, David, "Architecture and Blocking", Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), pp.1~53 (2008)
  17. On the Syntax of Argument Structure, "Hale, Kenneth", Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, ~, pp.Lexicon Project Working Papers 7 (1991)
  18. Hale, Kenneth, "The View from Building 20", pp.53~109 (2003), MIT Press
  19. Lasnik, Howard, "Clause-mate conditions", Glot International, 6(3), pp.201~225 (2002)
  20. Lasnik, Howard, "Move Alpha" (1992), MIT Press
  21. Marantz, Alec, "No Escape from Syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), pp.201~225 (1997)
  22. Moro, Andrea, "Dynamic Antisymmetry" (2000), MIT Press
  23. Postal, Paul, "On Raising: One Rule of Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications" (1974), MIT Press
  24. Rizzi, Luigi, "The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators", pp.17~32 (2010), OUP
  25. Rizzi, Luigi, "Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in Honour Adriana Belletti", pp.17~46 (2015), Benjamin
  26. Searle, John, "On Noam Chomsky: Critical Essays" (1974), Anchor Press
  27. Voegelin, Charles Frederick, "Review of Noam Chomsky: Syntactic Structures", International Journal of American Linguistics, 24, pp.229~231 (1958)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)