본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Task-in-process During Information-gap Activities in Korean Middle School English Classrooms

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

A growing number of task-based learning (TBL) research has employed a processoriented research framework to analyze second language data in L2 classrooms using a task-in-process vs. task-as-workplan dichotomy (e.g., Seedhouse, 2004). Adopting the task-in-process framework, the current study analyzes how students in Korean EFL classrooms interact during information gap task activities. How do sequences of interaction during information gap tasks differ from the task-as-workplan? What are the specific institutional goals that the participants orient to while completing these tasks? This article attempts to answer these questions by analyzing the interactions that occur during a series of information gap tasks performed by different groups of Korean middle school students. The findings show how information gap tasks create minimized and truncated sequences that are different from the task-as-workplan as well as from how people would interact in ordinary conversation. Rather than promoting more talk by engaging in negotiation of meaning, learners engaged in a series of completion-oriented sequences to find the correct response in the most efficient way possible. The paper ends with suggestions for improving the design of tasks in pedagogical settings.

Abstract

A growing number of task-based learning (TBL) research has employed a processoriented research framework to analyze second language data in L2 classrooms using a task-in-process vs. task-as-workplan dichotomy (e.g., Seedhouse, 2004). Adopting the task-in-process framework, the current study analyzes how students in Korean EFL classrooms interact during information gap task activities. How do sequences of interaction during information gap tasks differ from the task-as-workplan? What are the specific institutional goals that the participants orient to while completing these tasks? This article attempts to answer these questions by analyzing the interactions that occur during a series of information gap tasks performed by different groups of Korean middle school students. The findings show how information gap tasks create minimized and truncated sequences that are different from the task-as-workplan as well as from how people would interact in ordinary conversation. Rather than promoting more talk by engaging in negotiation of meaning, learners engaged in a series of completion-oriented sequences to find the correct response in the most efficient way possible. The paper ends with suggestions for improving the design of tasks in pedagogical settings.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Atkinson, J. M., "Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  2. Breen, M. P., "Lancaster practical papers in English language education Vol. 7: Language learning tasks", pp.23~46 (1987), Prentice Hall
  3. Bygate, M., "Task-based language teaching: A reader", pp.495~500 (2009), John Benjamins
  4. Cazden, C., "Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning" (2001), Heinemann
  5. Doughty, C., "“Information gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition?", TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), pp.305~325 (1986)
  6. Ellis, R., "Task-based research and language pedagogy", Language Teaching Research, 4, pp.193~220 (2000)
  7. Ford, C. E., "Contingency and units in interaction", Discourse Studies, 6(1), pp.27~52 (2004)
  8. Gass, S., "Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings", Language Learning, 55, pp.575~611 (2005)
  9. Gass, S., "Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition", pp.327~351 (1986), Newbury House
  10. Hauser, E., "Coding ‘corrective recasts’ : The maintenance of meaning and more fundamental problems", Applied Linguistics, 26, pp.293~316 (2005)
  11. Heritage, J., "Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice", pp.222~245 (2004), Sage
  12. Heritage, J., ""Why do you ask?" The function of questions in institutional discourse", pp.42~68 (2010), Oxford University Press
  13. 현주은, "The Effects of Task Complexity and Working Memory on Korean Adult Learners’ English Speaking Performance", 영어교육, 73(1), pp.115~134 (2018), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  14. Jackson, D., "Complementary theoretical perspectives on task-based classroom realities", TESOL Quarterly, 51, pp.493~506 (2017)
  15. Jenks, C. J., "Floor management in task-based interaction : The interactional role of participatory structures", System, 35, pp.609~622 (2007)
  16. Jenks, C. J., "Exchanging missing information in tasks : Old and new interpretations", The Modern Language Journal, 93, pp.185~194 (2009)
  17. 정주경, "Effects of Task Complexity on L2 Reading and L2 Learning", 영어교육, 71(4), pp.141~166 (2016), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  18. Kasper, G., "The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction", pp.390~408 (2015), Wiley-Blackwell
  19. Kim, Y., "Implementation of a localized task-based course in an EFL context : A study of students’ evolving perceptions", TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), pp.632~660 (2017)
  20. Lee, J., "Collaborative planning in process : An Ethnomethodological perspective", TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), pp.536~575 (2017)
  21. Lee, Y. -A., "Third turn position in teacher talk : Contingency and the work of teaching", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.180~206 (2007)
  22. Long, M. H., "Input, interaction and second language acquisition", doctoral, pp.1980
  23. Long, M. H., "Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching" (2015), Wiley
  24. Loschky, L., "Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice", pp.123~167 (1993), Multilingual Matters
  25. Mackey, A., "Second language research: Methodology and design" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum
  26. Mori, J., "Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities : A case from a Japanese language classroom", The Modern Language Journal, 88, pp.536~550 (2004)
  27. Markee, N., "Conversation analysis" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers
  28. Markee, N., "The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction" (2015), Wiley Blackwell
  29. Mori, J., "Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom", The Modern Language Journal, 88, pp.536~550 (2004)
  30. Nakahama, Y., "Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities : A comparative discourse analysis", TESOL Quarterly, 35, pp.377~405 (2001)
  31. Nunan, D., "Designing tasks for the communicative classroom" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  32. Ohta, A., "Second language acquisition process in the classroom: Learning Japanese" (2001), Erlbaum
  33. Park, Y., "The roles of third-turn repeats in two L2 classroom interactional contexts", Applied Linguistics, 61, pp.1~24 (2013)
  34. Pekarek Doehler, S., "Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics", pp.105~127 (2010), Palgrave Macmillan
  35. Pica, T., "Classroom learning, teaching, and research : A task-based perspective", The Modern Language Journal, 89, pp.339~352 (2005)
  36. Pica, T., "Information gap tasks : Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.301~338 (2006)
  37. Pienemann, M., "Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, pp.186~214 (1981)
  38. Pomerantz, A., "Offering a Candidate Answer : An Information-seeking Strategy", Communication Monographs, 55, pp.360~373 (1988)
  39. Raymond, G., "Grammar and social organization : Yes", no interrogatives and the structure of responding, 2003, pp.68, 939~967
  40. Richards, K., "Applying conversation analysis" (2016), Springer Press
  41. Robinson, P., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.211~266 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  42. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning : Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, pp.193~213 (2007)
  43. Robinson, P., "Second language task complexity:Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance", pp.3~37 (2011), John Benjamins
  44. Samuda, V., "Domains and directions in the development of TBLT", pp.271~301 (2015), John Benjamins
  45. Schegloff, E. A., "Analyzing Single Episodes of Conversation : An Exercise in Conversation Analysis", Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, pp.101~114 (1987)
  46. Schegloff, E. A., "Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  47. Shintani, N., "Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners" (2016), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  48. Seedhouse, P., "The relationship between context and the organisa- tion of repair in the L2 classroom", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(1), pp.59~80 (1999)
  49. Seedhouse, P., "The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
  50. Seedhouse, P., "Task as research construct", Language Learning, 55, pp.533~570 (2005)
  51. Seedhouse, P., "A holistic approach to task-based interaction", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), pp.311~338 (2009)
  52. Skehan, P. A., "Cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  53. Skehan, P., "Task-based instruction", Language Teaching, 36, pp.1~14 (2003)
  54. Ten Have, P., "Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide" (2007), Sage publications
  55. Ur, P., "Grammar practice activities" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  56. Willis, J., "A framework for task-based learning" (1996), Longman
  57. Wong, J., "Repetition in conversation : A look at first and second sayings", Research on Language & Social Interaction, 33, pp.407~424 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)