본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Exploratory Study on an English Diagnostic Test of Speaking and Writing Skills for Korean College Freshmen

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The current study of a diagnostic test administered at a local university in Korea aims to see if it functions well to measure students’ productive English skills and to provide practical information to use the test as a valid instrument for placing students into leveled English classes. With these aims, this study analyzed the internal structure of the test and the optimal number of groups clustered by the test scores. Further, the relationship between the speaking and writing performance of Korean college students was investigated. The examinees of the diagnostic test of writing and speaking skills were 3,542 incoming college freshmen. An analysis of the test results showed that the current test was structured with two distinct constructs: writing and speaking skills. Further, two-step cluster analysis revealed that the students were classified into four groups on the basis of their speaking and writing performances. The entire group of students showed a moderate correlation between speaking and writing performance, though the four subgroups from the cluster analysis showed very weak to insignificant correlations. These low correlations were also observed in the four groups divided according to students' speaking or writing performance.

Abstract

The current study of a diagnostic test administered at a local university in Korea aims to see if it functions well to measure students’ productive English skills and to provide practical information to use the test as a valid instrument for placing students into leveled English classes. With these aims, this study analyzed the internal structure of the test and the optimal number of groups clustered by the test scores. Further, the relationship between the speaking and writing performance of Korean college students was investigated. The examinees of the diagnostic test of writing and speaking skills were 3,542 incoming college freshmen. An analysis of the test results showed that the current test was structured with two distinct constructs: writing and speaking skills. Further, two-step cluster analysis revealed that the students were classified into four groups on the basis of their speaking and writing performances. The entire group of students showed a moderate correlation between speaking and writing performance, though the four subgroups from the cluster analysis showed very weak to insignificant correlations. These low correlations were also observed in the four groups divided according to students' speaking or writing performance.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Anastasi,A, "Evolving concepts of test validation", Annual Review of Psychology, 37, pp.1~15 (1986)
  2. Bachman,L.F, "Fundamental considerations in language testing" (1990), Oxford University Press.
  3. Bachman, L. F, "Language testing in practice" (1996), Oxford University Press.
  4. Bobko,P, "Correlation and regression. (2nd ed.)" (2001), Sage Publications
  5. Brown,H.D, "Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices" (2004), Longman
  6. Brown,J.D, "Testing in language programs (2nd ed.)" (2005), McGraw-Hill
  7. Chalhoub-Devile,M, "Second language interaction: current perspectives and future trends", Language Testing, 20(4), pp.369~383 (2003)
  8. Chen, P. E, "Correlation: Parametric and nonparametric measures" (2002), Sage Publications
  9. Chiu, T, "A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment", Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp.263~ (2001)
  10. 조동완, "쓰기 중심의 대학 교양영어 프로그램의 성과에 관한 연구", Foreign Languages Education, 13(2), pp.69~91 (2006), 한국외국어교육학회
  11. Farhady,H, "Measures of language proficiency form the learner’s perspective", TESOL Quarterly, 16, pp.43~59 (1982)
  12. Fox,J, "Test decisions over time: Tracking validity", Language Testing, 21(4), pp.437~465 (2004)
  13. Fulcher,G, "An English language placement test: Issues in reliability and validity", Language Testing, 14(2), pp.113~138 (1997)
  14. Green, A. B, "Can placement tests inform instructional decisions?", Language Testing, 21(4), pp.467~494 (2004)
  15. Hirvela,A, "Connecting reading & writing in second language writing instruction" (2004), The University of Michigan Press
  16. Hughes,A, "Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.)" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  17. 조정순, "대학 교양영어 교육의 현황과 방향성 탐구", 영어교육, 57(2), pp.365~394 (2002), 한국영어교육학회
  18. 김정태, "ESL 학습자의 쓰기배치고사상의 오배치에 따른 이해도차이 연구", 영어어문교육, 12(3), pp.147~166 (2006), 한국영어어문교육학회
  19. Kim,K, "A case study of “Global English” and its effectiveness: A practical English program for college students", Foreign Languages Education, 11(3), pp.133~154 (2004)
  20. Kunnan,A.J, "An investigation of a criterion-referenced test using G-theory, and factor and cluster analyses", Language Testing, 9(1), pp.30~49 (1992)
  21. Laborda,J.G, "Introducing standardized EFL", ESL exams, 2007, pp.11(2), 3~9
  22. Lee,H.K, "A comparative study of ESL writers' performance in a paper based and a computer-delivered writing test", Assessing Writing, 9, pp.4~26 (2004)
  23. Lee, H. K, "Validity and topic generality of a writing performance test", Language Testing, 24(3), pp.307~330 (2007)
  24. Lee, Y. J, "The predictive validity of an ESL placement test: A mixed methods approach", Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), pp.366~389 (2007)
  25. "Korean examinees’ average score on iBT TOEFL is 77 points" (2009)[URL]
  26. The feasibility of modeling secondary TOEFL ability dimensions using multidimensional TRT models, "McKinley, R. L", Educational Testing Service, ~, pp.TOEFL Technical report RR 92-16 (1992)
  27. Messick,S, "Validity. In:Educational measurement", pp.12~103 (1989), Macmillan
  28. Murray,J, "Creating placement tests", ESL Magazine, 5(6), pp.22~24 (2002)
  29. Nation, L. S. P, "Teaching ESL and EFL listening and speaking" (2009), Routledge
  30. Norusis,M.J, "SPSS 12.0 Statistical procedures companion" (2003), Prentice-Hall
  31. 송 미 정, "대학 교양영어 교육의 통합적 접근: 서울대학교 대학영어 프로그램의 사례 연구", 영어교육, 59(2), pp.179~212 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
  32. Factor structure of the LanguEdge test across language groups, "Stricker, L. J", Educational Testing Service, ~, pp.TOEFL Monograph Series MS-32 (2005)
  33. 성 기 완, "대학 교양영어 수준별 교육과정 모형개발연구", Foreign Languages Education, 11(2), pp.377~406 (2004), 한국외국어교육학회
  34. Wall, D, "Evaluating a placement test", Language Testing, 11, pp.321~344 (1994)
  35. 유경아, "Placement Practices in University English Language Programs in Korea", Foreign Languages Education, 14(4), pp.27~48 (2007), 한국외국어교육학회
  36. Zhang, T, "BIRCH: An efficient data clustering method for very large databases", Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, pp.103~114 (1996)
  37. Zieky, M, "A primer on setting cut scores on tests of educational achievement" (2006), Educational Testing Service

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)