기호적 경험의 체험주의적 해명
An Experientialist Account of Symbolic Experience
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this paper is to offer an outline of the experientialist account of the nature and structure of symbolic experience. Despite the extended and complicated inquiries into ‘sign’, the critical question remains unanswered on how it gets its meaning. I suggest that the exprientialist conception of 'metaphorical mapping' successfully answers this question. 'Metaphorical mapping' fist came out as the key notion of the experientialist account of metaphor, which I found is nothing else than symbolization. Thus, symbolization is rendered as a matter of understanding or experiencing something 'in terms of' something else. That is, we understand a signifier in terms of our experience of the corresponding 'sign object'. That is, when we experience something at a symbolic level, we map our experience of a sign object onto the signifier. With these three elements, i.e., signifier, sign content, and sign object, I offer three most basic models for symbolic experience. This account will suffice to open plausible ways to answer some, if not all, of the crucial questions concerning the very life of signs in a whole new perspective.
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to offer an outline of the experientialist account of the nature and structure of symbolic experience. Despite the extended and complicated inquiries into ‘sign’, the critical question remains unanswered on how it gets its meaning. I suggest that the exprientialist conception of 'metaphorical mapping' successfully answers this question. 'Metaphorical mapping' fist came out as the key notion of the experientialist account of metaphor, which I found is nothing else than symbolization. Thus, symbolization is rendered as a matter of understanding or experiencing something 'in terms of' something else. That is, we understand a signifier in terms of our experience of the corresponding 'sign object'. That is, when we experience something at a symbolic level, we map our experience of a sign object onto the signifier. With these three elements, i.e., signifier, sign content, and sign object, I offer three most basic models for symbolic experience. This account will suffice to open plausible ways to answer some, if not all, of the crucial questions concerning the very life of signs in a whole new perspective.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김성도, "현대 기호학 강의" (1998), 민음사
- 김운찬, "현대기호학과 문화 분석" (2005), 열린책들
- 노양진, "번역은 비결정적인가?", pp.275~301 (1996), 철학
- 노양진, "지칭에서 의미로", pp.193~214 (1998), 철학
- 노양진, "이성의 이름", pp.61~83 (2001), 철학적 분석
- 래내커, 로널드, "인지문법의 토대 1-2" (1999), 박이정
- 래내커, 로널드, "개념, 영상, 상징: 문법의 인지적 토대" (2005), 박이정
- 레이코프,G.?M.존슨, "삶으로서의 은유" (2006), 박이정
- 벵베니스트, 에밀, "일반 언어학의 제문제 1-2", 민음사
- 비트겐슈타인, 루트비히, "철학적 탐구" (2006), 책세상
- 서정철, "기호에서 텍스트로: 언어학과 문학 기호학의 만남" (1998), 민음사
- 소쉬르,페르디낭, "일반언어학 강의" (1990), 민음사
- 에코, 움베르토, "기호: 개념과 역사" (2000), 열린 책들
- 윤평중, "푸코와 하버마스를 넘어서" (1997), 교보문고
- 존슨,마크, "마음 속의 몸: 의미, 상상력, 이성의 신체적 근거" (2000), 철학과 현실사
- 퍼스,찰스 샌더스, "퍼스의 기호 사상" (2006), 민음사
- 퍼트남,힐러리, "이성, 진리, 역사" (2002), 민음사
- Derrida, Jacques, "Margins of philosophy" (1982), University of Chicago Press
- Gadamer,Hans-Georg, "Truth and method" (1979), Sheed and Ward
- Peirce,Charles S., "Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce" (1960), Harvard University Press
- Putnam,Hilary, "Realism with a human face" (1990), Harvard University Press
- Quine,Willard Van Orman, "Word and object" (1960), MIT Press
- Searle,John, "The rediscovery of the mind" (1992), MIT Press