담화적 ‘법성지속 표지’로서의 영어 SAI 구문의 전치요소
Preposed elements of English subject-aux inversions as the ‘modality continuity marker’ in discourse
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There have been many approaches to Subject-Aux Inversion (SAI), which were based on the sentence level and were mostly about functions served by SAI and factors involved in SAI based on semantics. A remarkable result from these studies is that the preposed element contains [+affective] features, suggested by Klima (1964), Jackendoff (1972), Liberman (1974), among others. This study, based on the discourse level, aims to argue that the suggested [+affective] features need further elaboration because of counterexamples and suggest that the preposed element of the SAI construction functions to signal the modality continuity marker, which is an expended one from the text-strategic continuities by Virtanen (1988), defined as a thematic or topical uniform text-structuring orientation chosen for coherence between textual segments. This study demonstrates that the modality continuity marker signaled by the preposed elements concomitantly observes the information packaging principle, suggested by Ward et al (2002) and others, who argue the exclusion of SAIs from the categories of the information packaging constructions.
Abstract
There have been many approaches to Subject-Aux Inversion (SAI), which were based on the sentence level and were mostly about functions served by SAI and factors involved in SAI based on semantics. A remarkable result from these studies is that the preposed element contains [+affective] features, suggested by Klima (1964), Jackendoff (1972), Liberman (1974), among others. This study, based on the discourse level, aims to argue that the suggested [+affective] features need further elaboration because of counterexamples and suggest that the preposed element of the SAI construction functions to signal the modality continuity marker, which is an expended one from the text-strategic continuities by Virtanen (1988), defined as a thematic or topical uniform text-structuring orientation chosen for coherence between textual segments. This study demonstrates that the modality continuity marker signaled by the preposed elements concomitantly observes the information packaging principle, suggested by Ward et al (2002) and others, who argue the exclusion of SAIs from the categories of the information packaging constructions.
참고문헌 (50)
- 김두식, "영어의 주어-조동사 도치구문", 언어, 12(2), pp.217~247 (1987)
- 김두식, "영어문장분석" (2017), 한국문화사
- Birner, Betty J., "The discourse function of inversion in English", pp.1992
- Birner, Betty J, "Information status and word order : An analysis of English inversion", Language, 70(2), pp.233~259 (1994)
- Birner, Betty J., "Information status and noncanonical word order in English" (1998), John Benjamins
- Chen, Rong, "Subject auxiliary inversion and linguistic generalization: Evidence for functional", cognitive motivation in language, 2013, pp.24(1), 1~32
- Clark, Herbert Herb, "Discourse production and comprehension", pp.1~40 (1977), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Coates, Jennifer, "The Semantics of the modal auxiliaries" (1983), Croom Helm
- Deane, Paul D., "Grammar in mind and brain: Explorations in cognitive syntax" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
- Diver, William, "The modal system of the English verb", Word, 20, pp.322~352 (1964)
- Duffley, Patrick, "The role of DO-auxiliary in subject-auxiliary inversion: Developing Langacker’s notion of existential negotiation", Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), pp.269~287 (2016)
- Enkvist, Nils Erik, "Text Convexity, Text coherence: aspects, methods, results, Papers in text linguistics", pp.320~336 (1985), Helmut Buske
- Enkvist, Nils Erik, "A note towards the definition of text strategy", Zeitschrift far Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft and Kommunikationsforschung, 40(1), pp.19~27 (1987)
- Enkvist, Nils Erik, "Perspectives of language performance, To honour Werner Hüllen on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday", pp.337~350 (1987), Niemeyer
- Fowler, Henry Watson, "A dictionary of modern English usage" (1926), Clarendon Press
- Givón, Thomas, "Topic tontinuity in discourse", pp.1~41 (1983), John Benjamins
- Givón, Thomas, "Syntax. A functional-typological introduction, vol. I" (1984), John Benjamins
- Givón, Thomas, "English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction, vol. Ⅱ" (1993), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Givón, Thomas, "Syntax: An introduction, vol.ⅠandⅡ" (2001), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Grad, Anton, "Affectivity and inversion in Modern English, Zbornik Filozofske Fakultate", Ljubljana, 2, pp.335~375 (1955)
- Green, Georgia, M, "Some wherefores of English inversions", Language, 56, pp.582~601 (1980)
- Grimes, Joseph Evans, "The thread of discourse" (1975), Mouton
- Hartvigson, Hans H., "Inversion in present-day English" (1974), Odense University Press
- Hinds, John, "Discourse and Syntax", pp.135~157 (1979), Academic Press
- Huddleston, Rodney. D, "Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Review article on Palmer, 1974", Lingua, 40, pp.331~383 (1976)
- Jackendoff, Ray S., "Semantic interpretation in generative grammar" (1972), MIT Press
- Jacobsson, Bengt, "Inversion in English, with special reference to the early modern English period" (1951), Almqvist and Wiksell
- Jacobsson, Bengt, "Another look at negatively conditioned subject-operator inversion in English", Studia Linguistica, 40(2), pp.161~185 (1986)
- Kim, Doo-Shick, "A discourse-functional analysis of subject-verb inversion in English" (1999), Hankuk Publisher
- Klima, Edward S, "The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language", pp.264~323 (1964), Prentice-Hall
- Kruisinga, Etsko, "A handbook of present-day English, II:3" (1932), Noordhoff
- Lappin, Shalom, "On the pragmatics of mood", Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pp.559~578 (1982)
- Lasnik, Howard, "Analysis of negation in English", pp.1974
- Liberman, Mark, "On conditioning the rule of subj.-aux. inversion", Papers from the Fifth Annual Meeting, pp.77~91 (1974), Northeastern Linguistic Society
- Longacre, Robert E, "The form and meaning of the English auxiliary", Language, 54, pp.853~882 (1978)
- Longacre, Robert E., "The grammar of discourse" (1983), Plenum Press
- Lyons, John, "Semantics. vol. 2" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, Frank Robert, "Mood and modality" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Payne, John R, "Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. I: Clause structure", pp.197~242 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Penhallurick, John, "The semantics of auxiliary inversion in English", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 7, pp.97~128 (1987)
- Prince, Ellen F, "Radical pragmatics", pp.223~254 (1981), Academic Press
- Prince, Ellen F., "Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text", pp.295~325 (1992), John Benjamins
- Richard, Jack, "Longman dictionary of applied linguistics" (1985), Longman
- Rudanko, Juhani, "Towards a description of negatively conditioned subject operator inversion in English", English Studies, 63, pp.348~359 (1982)
- Virtanen, Tuija, "Discourse functions of adverbial placement in English: Clause-initial adverbials of time and place in narratives and procedural place descriptions", pp.1988
- Virtanen, Tuija, "Given and new information in adverbials: Clausal-initial adverbials of time and place", Journal of Pragmatics, 17(2), pp.99~115 (1992)
- Ward, Gregory, "The Cambridge grammar of the English language", pp.1363~1447 (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Witte, Stephen P., "Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches", pp.112~153 (1986), Sage
- Zandvoort, Reinard Willem, "A handbook of English grammar" (1975), Longman