본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Grammaticalization and Stance-taking of the Sentential Ending keya in Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This article aims to address grammaticalization pathways and stance-taking of the sentential ending keya in Korean. Keya (ke+ya), the nonhonorific form of kesipnita, derived from kesiya through s-deletion and i (copular)-deletion. Its starting point of grammaticalization is kes. Kes involves reference to the pronominal (i.e., things), the nominalizer (i.e., events), and the sentential nominalizer (i.e., proposition) through the mechanism of generalization. Kes absorbs the sentence force of -ya (semantic absorption). Therefore, keya is used in declaratives, exclamatives, interrogatives, and imperatives with prosody involved. Keya is more affixalized, agglutinated and fused than kesiya based on the usage comparison of ke and kes. Its morpho-syntactic and functional developments affect its stance-taking. This paper displays evolutional track of stance-taking of keya involved with the sentence force. Finally stance-takings induced by sentence force are broken into three categories of stance: attitudinal, epistemic, and emotional based on Rhee (2011a). This study is theoretically in accordance with Givón (1979: 209): yesterday’s syntax is today’s morphology.

Abstract

This article aims to address grammaticalization pathways and stance-taking of the sentential ending keya in Korean. Keya (ke+ya), the nonhonorific form of kesipnita, derived from kesiya through s-deletion and i (copular)-deletion. Its starting point of grammaticalization is kes. Kes involves reference to the pronominal (i.e., things), the nominalizer (i.e., events), and the sentential nominalizer (i.e., proposition) through the mechanism of generalization. Kes absorbs the sentence force of -ya (semantic absorption). Therefore, keya is used in declaratives, exclamatives, interrogatives, and imperatives with prosody involved. Keya is more affixalized, agglutinated and fused than kesiya based on the usage comparison of ke and kes. Its morpho-syntactic and functional developments affect its stance-taking. This paper displays evolutional track of stance-taking of keya involved with the sentence force. Finally stance-takings induced by sentence force are broken into three categories of stance: attitudinal, epistemic, and emotional based on Rhee (2011a). This study is theoretically in accordance with Givón (1979: 209): yesterday’s syntax is today’s morphology.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Bybee, Joan L., "The Evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, modality in the language of the world" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
  2. "Cheju University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences", 1994, 17~58
  3. Givόn, Talmy, "On understanding grammar" (1979), Academic Press
  4. "Kwukekwukwunhak (Korean Language and Literature)", 1983, 31~89
  5. Hopper, Paul J., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge Univ. Press
  6. Horie, Kaoru, "On the polyfunctionality of the Japanese particle no: from the perspectives of ontology and grammaticalization. Studies in Japanese grammaticalization: Cognitive and discourse perspectives", pp.169~192 (1998), Kurosio Publishers
  7. Krug, Manfred G., "Emerging English modals: A corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
  8. Lee, Heeja, (2001), Hankuk Publisher
  9. Park, Ki-seong, "The Grammaticalization of Complementatizer kes and Subordinators in Korean", Journal of Humanities, 50(1), pp.105~123 (1997)
  10. "석사", Sang Myung University, 1999
  11. Rhee, Seongha, (1998), Hankuk Publisher
  12. Rhee, Seongha., "On the rise and fall of Korean nominalizers. Rethinking grammaticalization", pp.239~264 (2008), John Benjamins
  13. Rhee, Seongha, "Nominalization and stance marking in Korean. Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspective. vol 2: Korean, Japanese, and Austronesian Languages", pp.393~422 (2011), John Benjamins
  14. Rhee, Seongha, "Context-induced reinterpretatin and (inter)subjectification: the case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles", Language Sciences, 34(3), pp.284~300 (2011)
  15. Shin, Mikyong, "Development of the adnominal system in some East Asian languages", 석사, pp.2005
  16. Smith, Carlotta, "Accounting for subjectivity (point of view). The Legacy of Zellig Harris. Language and Information into the 21st Century, 1: Philosophy of Science, Syntax, and Semantics. Festschrift für Zellig Harris", pp.137~163 (2002), John Benjamins
  17. Yap, Foong Ha, , pp.37~168 (2004), John Benjamins
  18. Yap, Foong Ha, "From nominalizer to stance marker: A syntactic account of grammaticalization and pragmaticization phonomena", Paper presented at From Ideation to Interpersonal: Perspectives from Grammaticalization (FITIGRA) Conference (2005)
  19. Yap, Foong Ha, "Nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages, In Rethinking Grammaticalization", pp.309~341 (2008), John Benjamins
  20. Zipf, George Kingley, "The psyco-biology of language" (1935), Houghton Mifflin

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)