띄어쓰기 규정 모호성 개선 방안 연구
A Study for the improvement of current spacing regulations
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper reviews the current spacing regulations and presents an alternative. This paper argues that the regulations in point should be viewed and revised from the perspective of ordinary people. The reason is that as there are no enforcing devices, the regulations need to be easy and clear enough for ordinary people to apply them to their casual writing without difficulty. For that purpose, this paper introduces three formal conditions as evaluation criteria. They are the following; definitude condition, simplicity condition, and coherence condition. This paper examines relevant regulations with the three formal conditions and shows that they fail to meet all the three requirements. The regulations examined here are related to the following; mono-syllable word sequence, auxiliary construction, and organization names/technical terms. Some of the current spacing regulations turn out to be redundant because they are inferred from other regulation. Some others are not helpful in that they are unnecessarily complicated and vague. Some regulations are not properly explained nor coherent to one another. In the light of the discussion, this paper propose to drop the unnecessary regulations in point and shows that this action enhance the degree of completion and learnability.
Abstract
This paper reviews the current spacing regulations and presents an alternative. This paper argues that the regulations in point should be viewed and revised from the perspective of ordinary people. The reason is that as there are no enforcing devices, the regulations need to be easy and clear enough for ordinary people to apply them to their casual writing without difficulty. For that purpose, this paper introduces three formal conditions as evaluation criteria. They are the following; definitude condition, simplicity condition, and coherence condition. This paper examines relevant regulations with the three formal conditions and shows that they fail to meet all the three requirements. The regulations examined here are related to the following; mono-syllable word sequence, auxiliary construction, and organization names/technical terms. Some of the current spacing regulations turn out to be redundant because they are inferred from other regulation. Some others are not helpful in that they are unnecessarily complicated and vague. Some regulations are not properly explained nor coherent to one another. In the light of the discussion, this paper propose to drop the unnecessary regulations in point and shows that this action enhance the degree of completion and learnability.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김민수, "문자의 최소 가지(可知) 차이", 새국어소식 (1999), 국립국어연구원
- 김창섭, "현대국어의 복합동사 연구", 국어연구, 47 (1996), 국어연구회
- 민현식, "국어 정서법 연구" (1999), 태학사
- 박정규, "띄어쓰기 문제의 궁극적인 해결을 위하여", 시학과 언어학, 27(15), pp.277~299 (2008), 시학과언어학회
- 박진호, "한국어의 동사와 문법요소의 결합 양상", 박사, pp.2003
- 서정수, "보조용언에 관한 연구1: 비합성적 보조용언", 한양어문연구, 2, pp.63~87 (1996)
- 서종학, "띄어쓰기의 역사와 규정", 인문연구, 18(1), pp.1~16 (1996), 영남대학교 인문과학연구소
- 손세모돌, "국어 보조용언 연구" (1996), 한국문화사
- 신창순, "한글 맞춤법 통일안의 검토", 어문연구, 41 (1984), 한국어문교육연구회
- 양명희, "띄어쓰기의 원리와 현실", 관악어문연구, 25(0), pp.183~199 (2000), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 연규동, "한글 맞춤법을 다시 읽는다", 언어학, 21, pp.157~184 (1997), (사)한국언어학회
- 이선웅, "띄어쓰기에 관한 몇 가지 문제", 국어국문학, 134, pp.123~141 (2003), 국어국문학회
- 이성구, "띄어쓰기 사전" (1995), 애플기획
- 이숙의, "용언의 구성과 띄어쓰기 방안에 대하여", 인문학연구, 34(3), pp.423~444 (2007), 인문과학연구소
- 이은정, "띄어쓰기 용례 및 해설" (1993), 백산출판사
- 이희승, "한글 맞춤법 강의" (1989), 신구문화사
- 임동훈, "띄어쓰기의 현황과 과제", 관악어문연구, 27, pp.439~455 (2002), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 임홍빈, "맞춤법 규정의 논리성과 명료성. In: 한글 맞춤법, 무엇이 문제인가" (1997), 태학사
- 채희락, "접어와 한국어 품사 분류: 품사 재정립 및 띄어쓰기 재고", 언어, 32(4), pp.803~826 (2007), 한국언어학회
- 최호철, "남북 띄어쓰기 규범의 통일에 대하여", 한국어학, 34(25), pp.343~364 (2004), 한국어학회
- 한글학회, "한글 새소식", pp.188~ (1988), 한글학회
- 한글학회, "우리말 큰사전" (1993), 어문각
- 황병순, "국어 복합동사에 대하여", 영남어문학, 13 (1986), 영남어문학회
- 허철구, "법률의 띄어쓰기", 새국어생활, 12(1) (1999), 국립국어연구원
