접미사 ‘들’의 복수성에 대한 연구 — ‘자기’의 국부적 결속 관계를 중심으로
A Study on the Plurality of a Marker –tul: Focusing on the Local Binding Relations with caki
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main goal of this paper is to shed light on the nature of plurality induced by the –tul marker in Korean. To avoid the optionality issue with common nouns, we concentrate on local binding relations between a plural antecedent and caki(-tul): For the first, it is discussed that (i) the co-valuation between the antecedent-reflexive pair can be satisfied differently according to the way in which the number is interpreted: e.g., singularity vs. plurality (collectivity, cumulativity or distributivity), thereby (ii) the resulting interpretation can vary: e.g., reflexive, reciprocal, or a mix. Given this, we specify what this means for a number mismatch in local binding relations; a plural-singular mismatch can be allowed only if the distributive reading is forced. Taken together, it is demonstrated that unlike the previous analyses argued, the plurality conveyed in the –tul marker cannot be confined to the distributivity or anti-collectivity. Lastly, caki and the mandarin Chinese ziji are briefly compared to reveal a novel contrast in a pronominal paradigm in terms of the number marking.
Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to shed light on the nature of plurality induced by the –tul marker in Korean. To avoid the optionality issue with common nouns, we concentrate on local binding relations between a plural antecedent and caki(-tul): For the first, it is discussed that (i) the co-valuation between the antecedent-reflexive pair can be satisfied differently according to the way in which the number is interpreted: e.g., singularity vs. plurality (collectivity, cumulativity or distributivity), thereby (ii) the resulting interpretation can vary: e.g., reflexive, reciprocal, or a mix. Given this, we specify what this means for a number mismatch in local binding relations; a plural-singular mismatch can be allowed only if the distributive reading is forced. Taken together, it is demonstrated that unlike the previous analyses argued, the plurality conveyed in the –tul marker cannot be confined to the distributivity or anti-collectivity. Lastly, caki and the mandarin Chinese ziji are briefly compared to reveal a novel contrast in a pronominal paradigm in terms of the number marking.
참고문헌 (46)
- 강범모, "복수성과 복수 표지: '들'을 중심으로", 언어학, (47), pp.3~31 (2007), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 강범모, "두 가지 복수형의 의미 차이에 대하여", 언어와 정보, 12(2), pp.115~137 (2008), 한국언어정보학회
- 박진호, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어 대명사 체계의 특징", 國語學, (50), pp.115~147 (2007), 국어학회[DOI]
- 전영철, "한국어의 복수성과 총칭성", 한정성, 2004, pp.8(2), 27~46[DOI]
- 전영철, "한국어 복수 표현의 의미론: ‘들’의 통합적 해석", 언어학, (49), pp.337~359 (2007), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 전영철, "한국어 집합 명사와 복수 표지 ‘들’", 어학연구, 51(3), pp.793~814 (2015), 언어교육원
- 최기용, "피결속-변항 대명사로서의 ‘자기’", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.325~364 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 허세문, "한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근", 언어학, (70), pp.141~178 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 허세문, "변항 결속 관계에 있어서 파이 자질의 유", 무표성에 대하여, 2015, ~
- Bale, A., "On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness: The case of plural morphology", Morphology, 21, pp.197~221 (2011)
- Bale, A., "Syntactic Complexity and Competition: The Singular-Plural Distinction in Western Armenian", Linguistic Inquiry, 45(1), pp.1~26 (2014)
- Cable, S., "Reflexives, Reciprocals and Contrast", Journal of Semantics, 31, pp.1~41 (2014)
- Champollion, L., "Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement", Ph.D, pp.2010
- Chierchia, G., "Events and Grammar", pp.53~103 (1998), Kluwer
- Cho, D. -I., "Anaphor or pronominal?", Language Research, 32, pp.621~636 (1996)
- Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use" (1986), Greenwood Publishing Group
- Cole, P., "Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
- Collins, C., "Imposters – A Study of Pronominal Agreement" (2012), MIT Press
- Cysouw, M., "The paradigmatic structure of person marking" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Daniel, M., "The World Atlas of Language Structures", pp.146~149 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Girogi, A., "On the Nature of Long Distance Anaphors", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(2), pp.321~342 (2007)
- Greenberg, J., "Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies" (1966), Mouton
- Han, C. -H., "Semantic binding of long-distance anaphor caki in Korean", Language, 88, pp.764~790 (2012)
- Heim, I., "Reciprocity and Plurality", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.63~102 (1991)
- Hoe, S., "On the 1st", 2nd person restriction of Korean anaphor caki and its implications, 2013, pp.49, ~
- Hoe, S., "A comparative study on anaphors in Korean and Mandarin Chinese", MS
- Huang, C.-T. James, "On the Formal Way to Chinese Languages" (2001), CSLI and Cambridge University Press
- Kang, B. -m, "Plurality and other Semantic Aspect of Common Nouns in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.1~25 (1994)
- Kim, C. -H., "The Korean Plural Marker -tul and its Implications", Doctor, pp.2005
- Kim, K., "The nature of associative plurality in Korean: Accounting for ney and tul", Proceedings of the Japanese, 2011, pp.19, ~
- Kim, S. -Y., "Acceptability and preference in the interpretation of anaphors", Linguistics, 38, pp.315~353 (2000)
- König, E., "Reciprocals and Reflexives Theoretical and Typological Explorations" (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
- Kratzer, A., "Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation", pp.269~300 (2008), de Gruyter
- Kratzer, A., "Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.187~237 (2009)
- Madigan, S., "Asymmetry in anaphoric dependencies: A cross-linguistic study of inclusive reference", Proceedings of PLC, 30 (2007)
- Nakanishi, K., "Plurality in languages without mass-count distinction", Paper presented at Mass, 2009, ~[DOI]
- Nakanishi, K., "Japanese Plurals are Exceptional", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, pp.113~140 (2004)
- Nevins, A., "Marked Triggers vs. Marked Targets and Impoverishment of the Dual", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.413~444 (2011)
- Landman, F., "Events and Plurality" (2000), Kluwer
- Park, S-Y., "Plural marking in classifier languages: a case study of the so-called plural marking -tul in Korean", Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 28, pp.281~295 (2008)
- Pollard, C., "Anaphors in English and the scope of the binding theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
- Rooryck, J., "Dissolving binding theory" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Sauerland, U., "Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces", pp.57~82 (2008), Oxford University Press
- Sharvit, Y., "Covaluation and Unexpected BT Effect", Journal of Semantics, 28, pp.55~106 (2011)
- Yoon, J-M., "Long-distance anaphors in Korean and their crosslinguistic implications", Proceedings of CLS 25: General Session, pp.479~495 (1989)
- Winter, Y., "Distributivity and dependency", Natural Language Semantics, 8, pp.27~69 (2000)