본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

재귀적 결속 관계의 수 (불)일치에 대한 소고

A study on the number (mis)match in reflexive binding relations

허세문
사단법인 한국언어학회 (The Linguistic Society of Korea)|2023.04|언어학 (EONEOHAG)|제95호|pp. 97-123|DOI 10.17290/jlsk.2023..95.97

3

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

reflexivespluralitynumber (mis)matchsemantic (un)markednessassociative plural readingplural markers-tul-ney
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper discusses various patterns of number (mis)match in reflexive binding relations, focusing on the Korean reflexive caki. By providing novel data, it is claimed that (i) various aspects of number interpretation in reflexives is (partly)　attributable to the presence/absence of plural markers in Korean (e.g., -tul and -ney), and (ii) in terms of semantic (in)compatibility, the semantic markedness of number plays a crucial role in specifying environments where a binding pair can be covalued with each other. Especially, it is discussed why, despite the symmetric nature of covaluation, the plurality in the antencedent[sg]-reflexive[pl] pair should amount to the associative plural reading while that of antencedent[pl]-reflexive[sg] one cannot. Taken together, the distinctive nature of the unmarkedness in a number domain is reexamined to clarify why a reflexive is required to bear a more unmarked feature to give rise to a (genuine) number mismatch in a binding relation.

Abstract

This paper discusses various patterns of number (mis)match in reflexive binding relations, focusing on the Korean reflexive caki. By providing novel data, it is claimed that (i) various aspects of number interpretation in reflexives is (partly)　attributable to the presence/absence of plural markers in Korean (e.g., -tul and -ney), and (ii) in terms of semantic (in)compatibility, the semantic markedness of number plays a crucial role in specifying environments where a binding pair can be covalued with each other. Especially, it is discussed why, despite the symmetric nature of covaluation, the plurality in the antencedent[sg]-reflexive[pl] pair should amount to the associative plural reading while that of antencedent[pl]-reflexive[sg] one cannot. Taken together, the distinctive nature of the unmarkedness in a number domain is reexamined to clarify why a reflexive is required to bear a more unmarked feature to give rise to a (genuine) number mismatch in a binding relation.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 강범모, "두 가지 복수형의 의미 차이에 대하여", 언어와 정보, 12(2), pp.115~137 (2008), 한국언어정보학회
  2. 사례, "한국어의 연합적 복수에 대한 연구", 國語學, (75), pp.271~297 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
  3. 임동훈, "복수의 형식과 의미", 한국어 의미학, 39, pp.25~49 (2012), 한국어의미학회
  4. 임홍빈, "국어의 재귀사 연구" (1987), 신구문화사
  5. 정상희, "복수 표현의 복수성과 화용적 의미", 한국어 의미학, 52, pp.31~59 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
  6. 최기용, "피결속-변항 대명사로서의 ‘자기’", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.325~364 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  7. 허세문, "한국어 필수 통제 구문 연구", 박사, pp.2014
  8. 허세문, "접미사 ‘들’의 복수성에 대한 연구 — ‘자기’의 국부적 결속 관계를 중심으로", 언어학, (85), pp.199~226 (2019), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  9. Bale, A., "On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness : The case of plural morphology", Morphology, 21, pp.197~221 (2011)
  10. Cable, S., "Reflexives, reciprocals and contrast", Journal of Semantics, 31, pp.1~41 (2014)
  11. Cho, D.-I., "Anaphor or pronominal?", Language Research, 32, pp.621~636 (1996)
  12. Chierchia, G., "Reference to kinds across languages", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.339~405 (1998)
  13. Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin, and use" (1986), Greenwood Publishing Group
  14. Collins, C., "Imposters – A Study of Pronominal Agreement" (2012), MIT Press
  15. Cooper, R., "Quantification and Syntactic Theory" (1983), Reidel
  16. Heim, I., "Forks in the road to Rule I, Invited talk", 38th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (2007)
  17. Heim, I., "Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces", pp.35~56 (2008), Oxford University Press
  18. Ippolito, M., "Subjunctive Conditionals – A Linguistic Analysis" (2013), MIT Press
  19. Jackendoff, R., "Mme Tussaud meets the binding theory", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 10, pp.1~31 (1992)
  20. Kang, B.-m., "Plurality and other semantic aspect of common nouns in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.1~25 (1994)
  21. Jibun-tachi and non-coreferential anaphora, "Kawasaki, N.", University of Massachusetts, ~ (1989)
  22. Kim, C.-H., "The Korean Plural Marker -tul and its Implications", Doctor, pp.2005
  23. Kim, K., "The nature of associative plurality in Korean: Accounting for ney and tul", Proceedings of the Japanese, 2010, 19~
  24. Kim, K., "Modifying plurals, classifiers, and co-occurrence: The case of Korean", Glossa, 25, pp.1~29 (2019)
  25. Kratzer, A., "Making a Pronoun : Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.187~237 (2009)
  26. Lidz, J., "Condition R", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.123~140 (2001)
  27. Madigan, S., "Asymmetry in anaphoric dependencies: A cross-linguistic study of inclusive reference", Proceedings of PLC, 30 (2007)
  28. Nemoto, N., "On mass denotations of bare nouns in Japanese and Korean", Linguistics, 43, pp.383~413 (2005)
  29. Nevins, A., "Marked triggers vs. marked targets and impoverishment of the dual", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.413~444 (2011)
  30. Plural marking in classifier languages: A case study of the so-called plural marking -tul in Korean, "Park, S-Y.", 281~295, pp.Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28 (2008)
  31. Park, S. -Y., "Two types of plurals and numeral classifiers in classifier languages: The case of Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31, pp.139~177 (2022)
  32. Anti-presupposition, Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora, "Percus, O.", Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 52~73, pp.Report No. 15320052 (2006)
  33. Pollard, C., "Anaphors in English and the scope of the binding theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
  34. Sağ Y., "Bare singulars and singularity in Turkish", Linguistics and Philosophy, 45, pp.741~793 (2022)
  35. Sauerland, U., "Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces", pp.57~82 (2008), Oxford University Press
  36. Sauerland, U., "Sentence and Context: Language, context, and cognition", pp.581~600 (2008), de Gruyter
  37. Sauerland, U., "Presuppositions and the alternative tier", Proceedings of SALT, 23, pp.156~173 (2013)
  38. Sauerland, U., "The plural is semantically unmarked. In Linguistic Evidence - Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives", pp.413~434 (2005), Mouton d’Gruyter
  39. Sharvit, Y., "Covaluation and unexpected BT effect", Journal of Semantics, 28, pp.55~106 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

접미사 ‘들’의 복수성에 대한 연구 — ‘자기’의 국부적 결속 관계를 중심으로강은지, 허세문사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2019 · 제85호Against Ambiguity Hypothesis on Number: Evidence from Reflexives김종혁사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2014 · 제22권 제3호Quirky Binding in the Object-Subject Construction and its Semantics강남길대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2008 · 제50권 제1호한국어 재귀사 ‘자기’의 속성엄홍준한국언어학회 · 언어2014 · 제39권 제4호Overlapping Reference and the So-called Plural Suffix Tul강남길대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2011 · 제53권 제1호Distributive and Collective Readings in a Conjunct NP Antecedent강남길대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2008 · 제50권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

된소리의 발달고광모pp. 3-30논항 실현의 한 양상: ‘있-’의 두 존대형최기용pp. 31-66한국어 보문절의 부가어 분석박소영pp. 67-96The English Suffix -less and Its Crosslinguistic Extension to Korean김지예pp. 125-142A Suggestion for Improving the Error Analysis on English-Korean Translation for English-Speaking Learners of Korean김영은, 박유경pp. 143-168
원문 보기