본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관계 설정(footing) 및 프레임 개념에 기반한 라이브 커머스 담화 분석 - 체현된 비대면 시청자의 존재를 중심으로 -

Discourse analysis of live commerce based on the concepts of footing and frame - Focusing on the presence of embodied online viewers -

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study analyzed live commerce, an online sales discourse, using Goffman's concepts of frame and footing. Frame refers to how participants define what interaction is, and footing is a concept that analyzes a single utterance by dividing the animator, who is the subject of the utterance, the author, who organizes the content of the utterance, and the principal, whose position is represented by the utterance. The objects of analysis were the conversations between an embodied online viewer, who interacts with the host representing the online viewers participating through comments, and the host of live commerce. As a result, there were frames of invitation, friendship, and sales. Depending on these frames, they shifted their footing. For example, in the friendship frame, the host spoke for herself to share her experiences, but in the sales frame, the host spoke on behalf of the company or the production team, even though the animator was still the host. From the perspective of parasocial interaction, which is the emotional bond felt by the recipient in mediated interaction, this study found that the embodied online viewer can become a new type of persona, namely the recipient persona.

Abstract

This study analyzed live commerce, an online sales discourse, using Goffman's concepts of frame and footing. Frame refers to how participants define what interaction is, and footing is a concept that analyzes a single utterance by dividing the animator, who is the subject of the utterance, the author, who organizes the content of the utterance, and the principal, whose position is represented by the utterance. The objects of analysis were the conversations between an embodied online viewer, who interacts with the host representing the online viewers participating through comments, and the host of live commerce. As a result, there were frames of invitation, friendship, and sales. Depending on these frames, they shifted their footing. For example, in the friendship frame, the host spoke for herself to share her experiences, but in the sales frame, the host spoke on behalf of the company or the production team, even though the animator was still the host. From the perspective of parasocial interaction, which is the emotional bond felt by the recipient in mediated interaction, this study found that the embodied online viewer can become a new type of persona, namely the recipient persona.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 김규현, "구어 자료의 전사 관행-담화 및 대화분석의 예를 중심으로", 언어사실과 관점, 23, pp.77~102 (2009)
  2. 김기태, "Frame Conflicts over Cheycil ‘Constitution’ in Korean Oriental Medical Discourse", 인문학연구, (23), pp.121~151 (2013), 인문학연구원
  3. 김기태, "대중매체 담화에서의 ‘(강제)소환’ 연구: 포지셔닝 이론의 관점에서", 담화와 인지, 28(2), pp.23~50 (2021), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  4. 김병준, "화장품 방문판매원들의 교육실태와 향후 교육방향에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2016
  5. 김윤강, "방문판매 판매자의 거래 지향성이 만족과 몰입을 매개로 재거래 의도에 미치는 영향", 유라시아연구, 15(1), pp.45~62 (2018), 아시아.유럽미래학회[DOI]
  6. 김예솔란, "1인 미디어의 커뮤니케이션 특성이 콘텐츠 수용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 준사회적 상호작용의 매개효과를 중심으로", 광고학연구, 32(2), pp.163~188 (2021), 한국광고학회[DOI]
  7. 김채이, "라이브 커머스 마케팅", 마케팅, 56(6), pp.58~67 (2022)
  8. 나익주, "도덕성 은유와 프레임 전쟁:적폐 청산을 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 26(2), pp.1~25 (2019), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  9. 나익주, "한일 무역 갈등을 둘러싼 한국 사회의 프레임 전쟁:신문 사설 제목을 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 28(2), pp.51~73 (2021), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  10. 동몽첩, "소셜미디어 배경에서 스포츠 스타 특성과 준사회적 상호작용이 구매의도에 미치는 영향", 한국스포츠학회, 20(4), pp.381~392 (2022), 한국스포츠학회
  11. 박지선, "SNS 브랜드 페이지에서 소비자-브랜드 관계 형성에 미치는 영향 요인 분석 - 준사회적 상호작용 역할을 중심으로 -", 복식문화연구, 25(1), pp.88~103 (2017), 복식문화학회[DOI]
  12. 유현빈, "한국어 뉴스 인터뷰 대화에서 나타나는 관계 설정의 전환(footing shift): 인터뷰어의 질문을 중심으로", 사회언어학, 30(1), pp.211~237 (2022), 한국사회언어학회[DOI]
  13. 이은선, "소셜미디어 인플루언서의 준사회적 상호작용과 관계가 이용자의 브랜드 태도와 구매 의도에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 21(3), pp.270~281 (2021), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  14. 이은희, "화장품 방문판매직 취업여성의 필요능력과 현재능력에 관한 연구", 가정과삶의질연구, 22(5), pp.1~16 (2004), 가정과삶의질학회
  15. 이창봉, "정치은유와 프레임형성: '한국사 교과서 국정화' 정치 담화를 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 24(1), pp.69~92 (2017), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  16. 이혜진, "화장품 성분 인식이 제품 판매에 미치는 영향 연구", 석사, pp.2015
  17. 조정수, "소비자와 브랜드의 친구관계 : 준사회적 상호작용을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2017
  18. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, "Structures of social action : Studies in conversation analysis" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  19. Bell, Allan, "Language style as audience design", Language in Society, 13(2), pp.145~204 (1984)[DOI]
  20. Choe, Hanwool, "Eating together multimodally : Collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating", Language in Society, 48(2), pp.171~208 (2019)[DOI]
  21. Clayman, Steven E, "Displaying neutrality in television news interviews", Social Problems, 35(4), pp.474~492 (1988)[DOI]
  22. Clayman, Steven E, "Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings", pp.163~198 (1992), Cambridge University Press
  23. Davies, Bronwyn, "Positioning theory:Moral contexts of intentional action", pp.32~52 (1990), Blackwell
  24. Dwyer, F. Robert, "Developing buyer-seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, 51(2), pp.11~27 (1987)[DOI]
  25. Gee, James P, "An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method" (2014), Routledge
  26. Goffman, Erving, "Frame analysis : An essay on the organization of experience" (1974), Harper and Row
  27. Goffman, Erving, "Forms of talk" (1981), University of Pennsylvania Press
  28. Hopkinson, Christophe, "Oppositional stance and footing shifts in responses to customer complaints on TripAdvisor", Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 135(1), pp.15~27 (2018)[DOI]
  29. Horton, Donald, "Mass communication and parasocial interaction : Observations on intimacy at adistance", Psychiatry, 19(3), pp.215~229 (1956)[DOI]
  30. Ochs, Elinor, "Interaction and grammar" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  31. Perse, M. Elizabeth, "Attribution in social and parasocial relationships", Communication Research, 16(1), pp.59~77 (1989)
  32. Persson, Gustav, "Speaking on behalf of oneself : Negotiating speaker identities in journalistic discourse on refugee activism in Sweden", Discourse & Society, 30(2), pp.188~204 (2019)[DOI]
  33. Roberts, Celia, "Talk, work, and institutional order", pp.109~143 (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
  34. Schiffrin, Deborah, "Approaches to discourse" (1994), Blackwell
  35. Smith, Wendy B, "Footing, resistance and control : Negotiating a traffic citation", Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 7, pp.173~186 (2010)[DOI]
  36. Tannen, Deborah, "New dimensions in discourse processes", pp.137~181 (1979), Ablex
  37. Tannen, Deborah, "Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction : Examples from a medical examination", interview, 1987, pp.50(2), 205~216
  38. Todd, Alexandra, "The prescription of contraception: Negotiations between doctors and patients", Discourse Processes, 7, pp.171~200 (1984)[DOI]
  39. "방문판매 정경미 아이오페에서 나왔습니다" (2022), 네이버쇼핑라이브[URL]
  40. "방문판매 정경미 헤라에서 나왔습니다" (2022), 네이버쇼핑라이브[URL]
  41. "방문판매 정경미 쿠첸에서 나왔습니다" (2022), 네이버쇼핑라이브[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)