영어 및 한국어에 나타난 가상이동 연구
A Study of Fictive Motion in English and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to categorize fictive motion based on affordances for human translocation, examining and comparing the language-specific characteristics in both English and Korean. The research yielded several key findings. First, path expression emerged as a fundamental element in both languages, with the perception of horizontal and vertical movements linked to the comprehending of linear motion. Second, distinct differences were observed between English and Korean. In English, Type A fictive motion was characterized by the use of adverbs to indicate manner, along with a diverse range of verbs denoting non-linear movement. For Type B fictive motion, quasi-predicatives were prominent in conveying the state of the path, and the use of verbs for non-linear movement was relatively uncommon. In Korean, the progressive form ‘-ko it-’ was observed in fictive motion of Type A, while both horizontal and vertical movements appeared sequentially within a single sentence in fictive motion of Type B. These language-specific traits were analyzed as manifestations of an ‘egocentric viewing arrangement’ within the ‘stage model.’ Consequently, while the perception of horizontal movement in fictive motion was similar in English and Korean, variations in specificity were evident. Additionally, the perception of vertical movement differed based on the chosen viewing arrangement method.
Abstract
This study aims to categorize fictive motion based on affordances for human translocation, examining and comparing the language-specific characteristics in both English and Korean. The research yielded several key findings. First, path expression emerged as a fundamental element in both languages, with the perception of horizontal and vertical movements linked to the comprehending of linear motion. Second, distinct differences were observed between English and Korean. In English, Type A fictive motion was characterized by the use of adverbs to indicate manner, along with a diverse range of verbs denoting non-linear movement. For Type B fictive motion, quasi-predicatives were prominent in conveying the state of the path, and the use of verbs for non-linear movement was relatively uncommon. In Korean, the progressive form ‘-ko it-’ was observed in fictive motion of Type A, while both horizontal and vertical movements appeared sequentially within a single sentence in fictive motion of Type B. These language-specific traits were analyzed as manifestations of an ‘egocentric viewing arrangement’ within the ‘stage model.’ Consequently, while the perception of horizontal movement in fictive motion was similar in English and Korean, variations in specificity were evident. Additionally, the perception of vertical movement differed based on the chosen viewing arrangement method.
참고문헌 (39)
- 임지룡, "주관적 이동표현의 인지적 의미 특성", 담화와인지, 5(2), pp.181~205 (1998)
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "의미망 분석과 다의성 판정의 원리", 담화와 인지, 16(3), pp.195~216 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 임태성, "가상 이동의 개념과 인식에 대한 연구", 한글, 79(2), pp.399~431 (2018), 한글학회[DOI]
- 임태성, "이동의 가상적 확장에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 25(3), pp.49~67 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 임태성, "인지언어학 탐구의 현황과 과제", pp.379~401 (2019)
- 임태성, "경로 동사를 통한 가상이동 인식에 대한 연구", 한국어 의미학, 68, pp.49~71 (2020), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 정해권, "한국어 문법상과 어휘상의 인지언어학적 접근", 담화와 인지, 28(3), pp.81~108 (2021), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Abdulkareem, Mustafa Abdulsahib, "The constructional analysis of emanation fictive motion in Arabic : A cognitive semantic-syntactic study", Journal of University of Babylon for Humanities, 29(6), pp.257~270 (2021)
- Blomberg, Johan, "The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai", Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), pp.657~696 (2015)[DOI]
- Blomberg, Johan, "Non-actual motion : Phenomenological analysis and linguistic evidence", Cognitive Processing, 16, pp.153~157 (2015)
- Huumo, Tuomas, "Many ways of moving along a path: What distinguishes prepositional and postpositional uses of Finnish path adpositions?", Lingua, 133, pp.319~335 (2013)[DOI]
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Abstract motion", Proceeding of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Semantic Typology, pp.455~471 (1986)
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. I" (1987), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Subjectification", Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), pp.5~38 (1990)
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Alternative linguistics", pp.153~212 (1995), John Benjamins
- Langacker, Ronald W, "Virtual reality", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), pp.77~103 (1999)
- Liddell, Scott K, "Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American sign language" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Ma, Sai, "Coextension paths in modern standard Chinese", International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 5(1), pp.119~134 (2014)
- Matlock, Teenie G, "How real is fictive motion?", Ph.D, pp.2001
- Matlock, Teenie G, "Fictive motion as cognitive simulation", Memory & Cognition, 32(8), pp.1389~1400 (2004)
- Matsumoto, Yo, "Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs", Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), pp.183~226 (1996)[DOI]
- Matsumoto, Yo, "Conceptual structure, discourse and language", pp.359~373 (1996), CSLI Publications
- Mishra, Ramesh Kumar, "Online fictive motion understanding : An eye-movement study with Hindi", Metaphor and Symbol, 25(3), pp.144~161 (2010)[DOI]
- Richardson, Daniel, "The integration of figurative language and static depictions : An eye movement study of fictive motion", Cognition, 102(1), pp.129~138 (2007)
- Rojo, Ana, "Fictive motion in English and Spanish", International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), pp.123~151 (2003)[DOI]
- Stosic, Dejan, "Does the road go up the mountain? Fictive motion between linguistic conventions and cognitive motivations", Cognitive Processing, 16, pp.221~225 (2015)
- Sweetser, Eve, "From etymology to pragmatics : Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Takahashi, Kiyoko, "Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics", pp.291~312 (2018), De Gruyter Mouton
- Talmy, Leonard, "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 4", pp.181~238 (1975), Brill
- Talmy, Leonard, "How language structures space, Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application", pp.225~282 (1983), Plenum Press
- Talmy, Leonard, "Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms, Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Talmy, Leonard, "Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’, Language and space", pp.211~276 (1996), MIT Press
- Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring systems" (2000), The MIT Press
- Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring" (2000), The MIT Press
- Taremaa, Piia, "Fictive and actual motion in Estonian : Encoding space", SKY Journal of Linguistics, 26, pp.151~183 (2013)
- Tomczak, Ewa, "Real and fictive motion processing in Polish L2users of English and monolinguals: Evidence for different conceptual representations", The Modern Language Journal, 99(S1), pp.49~65 (2015)[DOI]
- Twardzisz, Piotr, "Virtual and actual existentials in English, Swedish and Icelandic1", Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), pp.163~190 (2000)[DOI]
- Varela, Francisco J., "The embodied mind : Cognitive science and human experience" (1991), The MIT Press