본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Understanding the Influence of Local Coherence on the Reanalysis Process of Temporally Ambiguous Noun Phrase: The Role of Animacy

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

In this study, we conducted a self-paced reading experiment to explore how a locally coherent structure formed by an animate temporally ambiguous noun phrase (DP) and its subsequent verb guides the reanalysis of the ambiguous DP. In the sentence “While the police was investigating the detective examined by the lawyer an officer opened the door,” the DP “the detective” following the ambitransitive verb “investigate” is temporally ambiguous in its syntactic position: it can be the direct object (DO) of “investigate” or the matrix subject (MS) of the main clause. This temporary syntactic ambiguity can be resolved upon encountering the DP “an officer,” which allows only the DO analysis of “the detective.” Following previous studies (cf. Phillips 1995), the DO analysis of “the detective” is initially preferred. This is compatible with the later appearing DP “an officer,” which should be the MS of the main clause. However, processing difficulty was observed when the DP “an officer” was encountered. This suggests that readers performed the MS reanalysis of the DP “the detective” before encountering the disambiguating DP “an officer.” In comparison, no processing difficulty was observed when the temporally ambiguous DP was inanimate (“the evidence”). This suggests that animacy plays a role in forming the local coherence (cf. Tabor et al. 2004) that leads to the reanalysis of the temporally DO/MS ambiguous DP.

Abstract

In this study, we conducted a self-paced reading experiment to explore how a locally coherent structure formed by an animate temporally ambiguous noun phrase (DP) and its subsequent verb guides the reanalysis of the ambiguous DP. In the sentence “While the police was investigating the detective examined by the lawyer an officer opened the door,” the DP “the detective” following the ambitransitive verb “investigate” is temporally ambiguous in its syntactic position: it can be the direct object (DO) of “investigate” or the matrix subject (MS) of the main clause. This temporary syntactic ambiguity can be resolved upon encountering the DP “an officer,” which allows only the DO analysis of “the detective.” Following previous studies (cf. Phillips 1995), the DO analysis of “the detective” is initially preferred. This is compatible with the later appearing DP “an officer,” which should be the MS of the main clause. However, processing difficulty was observed when the DP “an officer” was encountered. This suggests that readers performed the MS reanalysis of the DP “the detective” before encountering the disambiguating DP “an officer.” In comparison, no processing difficulty was observed when the temporally ambiguous DP was inanimate (“the evidence”). This suggests that animacy plays a role in forming the local coherence (cf. Tabor et al. 2004) that leads to the reanalysis of the temporally DO/MS ambiguous DP.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Ackerman, Lauren Marie, "Influences on parsing ambiguity", Ph.D, pp.2015
  2. Baayen, R. Harald, "Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items", Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), pp.390~412 (2008)[DOI]
  3. Barr, Dale J., "Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing : Keep it maximal", Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), pp.255~278 (2013)[DOI]
  4. Box, George E, "An analysis of transformations", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society : Series B(Methodological), 26(2), pp.211~243 (1964)[DOI]
  5. Carroll, David W, "Psychology of language", pp.2008, Thomson Brooks
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  7. Chomsky, Noam, "Formal Syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
  8. Cinque, Guglielmo, "Types of Ā-dependencies" (1990), MIT press
  9. Christianson, Kiel, "Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger", Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), pp.368~407 (2001)[DOI]
  10. Clifton Jr, Charles, "The use of thematic role information in parsing : Syntactic processing autonomy revisited", Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), pp.317~334 (2003)[DOI]
  11. DeVito, Joseph A, "Some psycholinguistic aspects of active and passive sentences", Quarterly Journal of Speech, 55(4), pp.401~406 (1969)[DOI]
  12. Dixon, Robert MW, "Changing valency : Case studies in transitivity" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  13. Ferreira, Fernanda, "The independence of syntactic processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), pp.348~368 (1986)[DOI]
  14. Ferreira, Fernanda, "Use of verb information in syntactic parsing : Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), pp.555~ (1990)[DOI]
  15. Ferreira, Fernanda, "Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences", Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), pp.725~745 (1991)[DOI]
  16. Frazier, Lyn, "The sausage machine : A new two-stage parsing model", Cognition, 6(4), pp.291~325 (1978)[DOI]
  17. Frazier, Lyn, "Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension : Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences", Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), pp.178~210 (1982)[DOI]
  18. Frazier, Lyn, "Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities : Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences", Journal of Memory and Language, 26(5), pp.505~526 (1987)[DOI]
  19. Gibson, Edward Albert Fletcher, "A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown", Ph.D, pp.1991
  20. Gibson, Edward Albert Fletcher, "Linguistic complexity : Locality of syntactic dependencies", Cognition, 68(1), pp.1~76 (1998)[DOI]
  21. Gibson, Edward Albert Fletcher, "Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium", pp.94~126 (2000), The MIT Press
  22. 김나연, "The Effect of Antecedent Complexity in the Processing of Noun Phrase Ellipsis", 담화와 인지, 29(4), pp.17~35 (2022), 담화·인지언어학회
  23. 김나연, "Processing of Referential Non-Isomorphism in Noun Phrase Ellipsis", 언어, 48(1), pp.1~26 (2023), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  24. Kimball, John, "Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language", Cognition, 2(1), pp.15~47 (1973)[DOI]
  25. Ziying Li, "Asymmetries of English wh-adjunct", argument in Negative Island Sensitivity: An Experimental Study, 2022, pp.29(4), 37~59[DOI]
  26. MacDonald, Maryellen C., "The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution", Psychological Review, 101(4), pp.676~ (1994)[DOI]
  27. Miller, George A, "Some psychological studies of grammar", American Psychologist, 17(11), pp.748~ (1962)[DOI]
  28. Paolazzi, Caterina L., "Passives are not hard to interpret but hard to remember : Evidence from online and offline studies", Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(8), pp.991~1015 (2019)[DOI]
  29. Phillips, Colin, "Right association in parsing and grammar", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, pp.37~93 (1995)
  30. Phillips, Colin, "On the strength of the local attachment preference", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, pp.323~346 (1997)
  31. Rayner, Keith, "Parsing temporally ambiguous complements", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(4), pp.657~673 (1987)[DOI]
  32. Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J., "Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution : Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1993, pp.47(2), 276~309
  33. Sag, Ivan A, "English relative clause constructions", Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), pp.431~483 (1997)[DOI]
  34. Tabor, Whitney, "Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), pp.355~370 (2004)[DOI]
  35. Trueswell, John C., "Semantic influences on parsing : Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 33(3), pp.285~318 (1994)[DOI]
  36. Trueswell, John C, "The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), pp.566~585 (1996)[DOI]
  37. Trueswell, John C., "How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud : Fast priming of verb argument structure", Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), pp.102~123 (1998)[DOI]
  38. Zehr, J., "PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX)", ~ (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)