본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Antecedent-Ellipsis Mismatch in the Resolution of Noun Phrase Ellipsis: Results from Eye-Tracking While Reading

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The understanding of elliptical constructions, in which material not present in the phonological or written form of a sentence is nonetheless present in its interpretation, presents a number of challenges for the sentence processing system. Specifically, upon identifying a Noun Phrase Ellipsis construction, readers must identify the antecedent in the memory and retrieve its contents (Kim, Brehm, and Yoshida 2019, Kim and Frazier 2023). In this study, based on Kim and Frazier (2023), we investigated the time-course of elliptical dependency resolution with strict/sloppy identity ambiguity using an eye-tracking while reading experiment, to distinguish what is retrieved in antecedent retrieval at earlier from later stages in processing and how retrieval proceeds. Our results revealed that the strict identity interpretation is preferred at initial stages of processing, indicating that coreference information is retrieved from memory (Kim and Frazier 2023). However, the sloppy identity interpretation shows clear signs of being entertained in later eye-tracking measures as well as in later regions, suggesting that coreference information is temporally prioritized over morphological cues in cue-based retrieval system of content-addressable memory access (Lewis, Vasishth, and Van Dyke 2006; Martin and McElree 2008, 2011). Our result supports Kim and Frazier’s (2023) overall conclusions regarding the parser’s prioritization and the representational content it can access in antecedent retrieval, and extends this finding to later stages of antecedent-ellipsis integration, when information accessible to the parser less rapidly can be integrated into the ongoing parse.

Abstract

The understanding of elliptical constructions, in which material not present in the phonological or written form of a sentence is nonetheless present in its interpretation, presents a number of challenges for the sentence processing system. Specifically, upon identifying a Noun Phrase Ellipsis construction, readers must identify the antecedent in the memory and retrieve its contents (Kim, Brehm, and Yoshida 2019, Kim and Frazier 2023). In this study, based on Kim and Frazier (2023), we investigated the time-course of elliptical dependency resolution with strict/sloppy identity ambiguity using an eye-tracking while reading experiment, to distinguish what is retrieved in antecedent retrieval at earlier from later stages in processing and how retrieval proceeds. Our results revealed that the strict identity interpretation is preferred at initial stages of processing, indicating that coreference information is retrieved from memory (Kim and Frazier 2023). However, the sloppy identity interpretation shows clear signs of being entertained in later eye-tracking measures as well as in later regions, suggesting that coreference information is temporally prioritized over morphological cues in cue-based retrieval system of content-addressable memory access (Lewis, Vasishth, and Van Dyke 2006; Martin and McElree 2008, 2011). Our result supports Kim and Frazier’s (2023) overall conclusions regarding the parser’s prioritization and the representational content it can access in antecedent retrieval, and extends this finding to later stages of antecedent-ellipsis integration, when information accessible to the parser less rapidly can be integrated into the ongoing parse.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. Aoun, Joseph, "Vehicle change phenomena as an argument for Move F", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(3), pp.525~538 (2007)[DOI]
  2. Baayen, R. Harald, "Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items", Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), pp.390~412 (2008)[DOI]
  3. Badecker, William, "The processing role of structural constraints on interpretation of pronouns and anaphors", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), pp.748~ (2002)[DOI]
  4. Barr, Dale J., "Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing : Keep it maximal", Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), pp.255~278 (2013)[DOI]
  5. Box, George EP, "An analysis of transformations", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society : Series B(Methodological), 26(2), pp.211~243 (1964)[DOI]
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
  7. Chung, Sandra, "Sluicing and logical form", Natural Language Semantics, 3(3), pp.239~282 (1995)[DOI]
  8. Clifton Jr, Charles, "Eye movements in reading words and sentences", Eye Movements : A Window on Mind and Brain, 27, pp.341~372 (2007)[DOI]
  9. Culicover, Peter W., "Simpler syntax" (2005), Oxford University Press
  10. Dalrymple, Mary, "Ellipsis and higherorder unification", Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(4), pp.399~452 (1991)[DOI]
  11. Dillon, Brian, "Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora : Experimental and modeling evidence", Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), pp.85~103 (2013)[DOI]
  12. Fiengo, Robert, "Indices and identity. No. 24" (1994), MIT press
  13. Frazier, Lyn, "On bound variable interpretations : The LF-only hypothesis", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), pp.125~140 (2000)[DOI]
  14. Frazier, Michael, "Morphological recoverability in gapping", Ph.D., pp.2015
  15. Gibson, Edward, "Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies", Cognition, 68(1), pp.1~76 (1998)[DOI]
  16. Ginzburg, Jonathan, "Interrogative investigations" (2000), CSLI Publications
  17. Hall, Kathleen Gael, "Relations and structure: A view from dependency resolution", Ph.D., pp.2021
  18. Hankamer, Jorge, "Deep and surface anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7(3), pp.391~428 (1976)
  19. Hardt, Daniel Francis, "Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing", Ph.D, pp.1993
  20. Hunter, Tim, "A restriction on vehicle change and its interaction with movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 47(3), pp.561~571 (2016)[DOI]
  21. Johnson, Kyle, "The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.439~479 (2001), Blackwell Publishers
  22. Kazanina, Nina, "The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora", Memory and Language, 56(3), pp.384~409 (2007)[DOI]
  23. Kehler, Andrew, "Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar" (2002), Center for the Study of Language and Information
  24. Kim, Christina, S., "The acceptability cline in VP ellipsis", Syntax, 14(4), pp.318~354 (2011)[DOI]
  25. 김나연, "The Effect of Antecedent Complexity in the Processing of Noun Phrase Ellipsis", 담화와 인지, 29(4), pp.17~35 (2022), 담화·인지언어학회
  26. 김나연, "Processing of Referential Non-Isomorphism in Noun Phrase Ellipsis", 언어, 48(1), pp.1~26 (2023), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  27. Kim, Nayoun, "The online processing of noun phrase ellipsis and mechanisms of antecedent retrieval", Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(2), pp.190~213 (2019)[DOI]
  28. Kim, Christina S., "The division of labor in explanations of verb phrase ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 41, pp.41~85 (2018)[DOI]
  29. Lewis, Richard L., "An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval", Cognitive Science, 29(3), pp.375~419 (2005)[DOI]
  30. Lewis, Richard L., "Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), pp.447~454 (2006)[DOI]
  31. Martin, Andrea E., "A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis", Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), pp.879~906 (2008)[DOI]
  32. Martin, Andrea E., "Memory operations that support language comprehension : Evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), pp.1231~ (2009)[DOI]
  33. Martin, Andrea E., "Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension : Evidence from sluicing", Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), pp.327~343 (2011)[DOI]
  34. McElree, Brian, "Working memory and focal attention", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(3), pp.817~ (2001)[DOI]
  35. McElree, Brian, "Serial position and set size in short-term memory : The time course of recognition", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 118(4), pp.346~ (1989)[DOI]
  36. McElree, Brian, "Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), pp.67~91 (2003)[DOI]
  37. Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence : Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  38. Merchant, Jason, "An asymmetry in voice mismatches in VP-ellipsis and pseudogapping", Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), pp.169~179 (2008)
  39. Merchant, Jason, "Voice and ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 44(1), pp.77~108 (2013)[DOI]
  40. Merchant, Jason, "The Oxford handbook of ellipsis", pp.18~46 (2018)
  41. Runner, Jeffrey T., "The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar", pp.594~613 (2005), CSLI Publication
  42. Runner, Jeffrey T., "Processing reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrase", Cognitive Science, 30(2), pp.193~241 (2006)[DOI]
  43. Safir, Ken, "Vehicle change and reconstruction in Ā-chains", Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), pp.587~620 (1999)[DOI]
  44. Sag, Ivan A, "Deletion and logical form", Ph.D, pp.1976
  45. Sag, Ivan A., "Toward a theory of anaphoric processing", Linguistics and Philosophy, pp.325~345 (1984)
  46. Shapiro, Lewis P., "On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis : Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), pp.517~532 (1995)[DOI]
  47. Shapiro, Lewis., "Charting the timecourse of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension : Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis", Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), pp.1~19 (2003)[DOI]
  48. Sturt, Patrick, "The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), pp.542~562 (2003)[DOI]
  49. Van Dyke, Julie A., "Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair : A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities", Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), pp.285~316 (2003)[DOI]
  50. Van Dyke, Julie A., "Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), pp.157~166 (2006)[DOI]
  51. Van Dyke, Julie A., "Cue-dependent interference in comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 65(3), pp.247~263 (2011)[DOI]
  52. van Gompel, Roger P. G., "The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(1), pp.128~ (2003)[DOI]
  53. van Riemsdijk, Henk, "A case study in syntactic markedness : The binding nature of prepositional phrases" (1978), Peter De Ridder
  54. Vasishth, Shravan, "Argument-head distance and processing complexity : Explaining both locality and antilocality effects", Language, 82(4), pp.767~794 (2006)
  55. Wagers, Matthew W., "Agreement attraction in comprehension : Representations and processes", Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), pp.206~237 (2009)[DOI]
  56. Williams, Edwin S, "Discourse and logical form", Linguistic Inquiry, pp.101~139 (1977)
  57. Yoshida, Masaya, "The Oxford handbook of ellipsis" (2018), Oxford University Press
  58. Yoshida, Masaya, "Predictive processing of syntactic structure : Sluicing and ellipsis in real-time sentence processing", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), pp.272~302 (2013)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)