본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Syntactic reanalysis and lingering misinterpretations in L2 sentence processing

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Readers often misinterpret sentences and reanalyze them, but their initial misinterpretations sometimes linger even after they finish reading the sentences. This lingering effect has been argued as evidence that comprehenders create interpretations to some extent that it seems “good enough” for them to understand the meaning (Christianson, Hollingworth, Halliwell, and Ferreira 2001). This study examined L2 learners’ processing of garden path sentences, investigating whether they show a lingering effect as L1 speakers do by employing the gender mismatch paradigm (Sturt 2003). In the self-paced reading experiment, participants read garden path sentences such as While Mary washed the boxer who was tall coughed and warmed herself with a blanket. If participants correctly rule out an initial misinterpretation from the temporary ambiguity, the reflexive herself would create a gender mismatch effect (i.e., reading times are slowed in the gender mismatch condition). After reading the sentences, participants were asked to answer follow-up comprehension questions such as Did Mary wash the boxer? The results showed that L2 learners were able to notice the temporary local ambiguity in a sentence and reanalyze the structure as L1 readers do. However, the rate of accurate responses for comprehension questions was significantly lower in the ambiguous condition than in the unambiguous condition, indicating that the L2 learners’ initial misinterpretations lingered. L2 learners do not seem to lack detailed syntactic representation, and their lingering misinterpretation could be explained by the good enough approach as for L1 readers. Participants eventually recovered from the garden path, showing the gender mismatch effect, but their global comprehension was significantly influenced by the initial misinterpretation, since they gave more incorrect answers when they read garden path sentences.

Abstract

Readers often misinterpret sentences and reanalyze them, but their initial misinterpretations sometimes linger even after they finish reading the sentences. This lingering effect has been argued as evidence that comprehenders create interpretations to some extent that it seems “good enough” for them to understand the meaning (Christianson, Hollingworth, Halliwell, and Ferreira 2001). This study examined L2 learners’ processing of garden path sentences, investigating whether they show a lingering effect as L1 speakers do by employing the gender mismatch paradigm (Sturt 2003). In the self-paced reading experiment, participants read garden path sentences such as While Mary washed the boxer who was tall coughed and warmed herself with a blanket. If participants correctly rule out an initial misinterpretation from the temporary ambiguity, the reflexive herself would create a gender mismatch effect (i.e., reading times are slowed in the gender mismatch condition). After reading the sentences, participants were asked to answer follow-up comprehension questions such as Did Mary wash the boxer? The results showed that L2 learners were able to notice the temporary local ambiguity in a sentence and reanalyze the structure as L1 readers do. However, the rate of accurate responses for comprehension questions was significantly lower in the ambiguous condition than in the unambiguous condition, indicating that the L2 learners’ initial misinterpretations lingered. L2 learners do not seem to lack detailed syntactic representation, and their lingering misinterpretation could be explained by the good enough approach as for L1 readers. Participants eventually recovered from the garden path, showing the gender mismatch effect, but their global comprehension was significantly influenced by the initial misinterpretation, since they gave more incorrect answers when they read garden path sentences.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. "lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8/URL:" (2014)[URL]
  2. Christianson, Kiel, "Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger", Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), pp.368~407 (2001)
  3. Christianson, Kiel, "Effects of plausibility on structural priming", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36(2), pp.538~544 (2010)
  4. Christianson, Kiel, "Younger and older adults’ “good-enough” interpretations of garden path sentences", Discourse Processes, 42(2), pp.205~238 (2006)
  5. Clahsen, Harald, "Grammatical processing in language learners", Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), pp.3~42 (2006)
  6. Clahsen, Harald, "Continuity and shallow structures in languageprocessing", Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), pp.107~126 (2006)
  7. Demberg, Vera, "Integration costs on auxiliaries? A self-paced reading study using WebExp", Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.2016~2065 (2013)
  8. "Ibex: A web interface for psycholinguistic experiments" (2012)[URL]
  9. Dussias, Paola E, "Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading", Acta Psychologica, 128(3), pp.501~513 (2008)
  10. Enochson, Kelly, "Collecting psycholinguistic response time data using Amazon Mechanical Turk", PloS One, 10(3), pp.e0116946~ (2015)
  11. Felser, Claudia, "The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English", Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), pp.453~489 (2003)
  12. Ferreira, Fernanda, "The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences", Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), pp.164~203 (2003)
  13. Ferreira, Fernanda, "Misinterpretations of garden path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), pp.3~20 (2001)
  14. Ferreira, Fernanda, "The independence of syntactic processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), pp.348~368 (1986)
  15. Ferreira, Fernanda, "Use of verb information in syntactic parsing : Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning", Memory and Cognition, 16(4), pp.555~568 (1990)
  16. Frazier, Lyn, "Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading", pp.559~586 (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd
  17. Frazier, Lyn, "Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension:Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences", Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), pp.178~210 (1982)
  18. Fine, Alex B, "The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), pp.1362~1376 (2016)
  19. Jackson, Carrie, "Proficiency level and the interaction of lexical and morphosyntactic information during L2 sentence processing", Language Learning, 58(4), pp.875~909 (2008)
  20. Jacob, Gunnar, "Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden path recovery", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), pp.907~925 (2016)
  21. Jiang, Nan, "Conducting reaction time research in second language studies" (2013), Routledge
  22. Kaschak, Michael P, "This construction needs learned", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133(3), pp.450~467 (2004)
  23. Keller, Frank, "Timing accuracy of web experiments: A case study using the WebExp Software Package", Behavior Research Methods, 41, pp.1~12 (2009)
  24. Kennison, Shelia M, "Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(3), pp.355~378 (2003)
  25. 김기택, "Sensitivity to ungrammatical object drop in English by Korean young and adult L2 learners", 언어연구, 32, pp.57~81 (2015), 언어정보연구소
  26. Kreiner, Hamutal, "Processing definitional and stereotypical gender in reference resolution: Evidence from eye-movements", Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), pp.239~261 (2008)
  27. Lim, Jung Hyun, "Second language sentence processing in reading for comprehension and translation", Bilingualism : Language and Cognition, 16(3), pp.518~537 (2013)
  28. Lim, Jung Hyun, "Integrating meaning and structure in L1-L2and L2-L1 translations", Second Language Research, 29(3), pp.233~256 (2013)
  29. Lim, Jung Hyun, "Second language sensitivity to agreement errors:Evidence from eye movements during comprehension and translation", Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(6), pp.1283~1315 (2015)
  30. MacDonald, Maryellen C, "Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution", Psychological Review, 101(4), pp.676~703 (1994)
  31. Malyutina, Svetlana, "What is it that lingers? Garden path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), pp.880~906 (2015)
  32. Mueller, Jeansue, "The acquisition of the Korean honorific affix(u)si by advanced L2 learners", The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), pp.318~339 (2013)
  33. Myslín, Mark, "Comprehension priming as rational expectation for repetition : Evidence from syntactic processing", Cognition, 147, pp.29~56 (2016)
  34. Papadopoulou, Despina, "Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing : A study of relative clause attachment in Greek", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), pp.501~528 (2003)
  35. Patson, Nikole D, "Lingering misinterpretations in garden path sentences: Evidence from a paraphrasing task", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), pp.280~285 (2009)
  36. Pickering, Martin J, "Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), pp.940~961 (1998)
  37. "R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing/URL" (2014)[URL]
  38. Roberts, Leah, "Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing", Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), pp.299~331 (2011)
  39. "Linger/URL" (2003)[URL]
  40. Staub, Adrian, "The return of the repressed: Abandoned parses facilitate syntactic reanalysis", Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), pp.299~323 (2007)
  41. Slattery, Timothy J, "Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations", Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), pp.104~120 (2013)
  42. Sturt, Patrick, "The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), pp.542~562 (2003)
  43. Sturt, Patrick, "Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery", Cognition, 105(2), pp.477~488 (2007)
  44. Trueswell, John C, "Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 33(3), pp.285~318 (2014)
  45. van Gompel, Roger P. G, "The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden path sentences: Evidence from structural priming", Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), pp.335~362 (2006)
  46. Williams, John N, "Incremental interpretation in second language sentence processing", Bilingualism : Language and Cognition, 9(1), pp.71~88 (2006)
  47. Zhou, Peiyun, "I “hear” what you’re “saying”: Auditory perceptual simulation, reading speed, and reading comprehension", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), pp.972~995 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)