한국어와 프랑스어의 <크기> 명사 대조 연구- <크기> 명사의 한⋅불 병렬 대상부류 구축을 위한 기초연구 -
Contrastive Study of the Nouns of Size in Korean and French:A Preliminary Research for the Parallel Construction of Their Object Classes
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present article examines the syntactic and semantic properties of the nouns of size in Korean and French―gili (length), nopi (height), neolbi (area, width), muge (weight), etc. in Korean and longueur, hauteur, largeur, poids, etc. in French―and build a parallel set of object classes for the two languages with a view to a contrastive study of those nouns. Thereby, it aims to show that the theory of object classes is relevant to the contrastive study of languages. For this purpose, this article takes the following steps. First, it overviews the construction of the nouns’ object classes in Korean and French and, in so doing, clarifies the rationale of studying the nouns of size: the classes for the nouns of state need to be revised for an appropriate analysis of the nouns of property. Next, it examines the syntactic and semantic properties of the Korean and French nouns of size to show that they belong to the class of identifying properties, and that there is a correlation between them and the predicates of the class of attributive properties of size―for example, between the nouns of measurement and the adjectives indicating size values, such as long, court, and étendu. Finally, this article presents some of the subclasses of the nouns of size, which is built on the basis of the above-mentioned correlation.
Abstract
The present article examines the syntactic and semantic properties of the nouns of size in Korean and French―gili (length), nopi (height), neolbi (area, width), muge (weight), etc. in Korean and longueur, hauteur, largeur, poids, etc. in French―and build a parallel set of object classes for the two languages with a view to a contrastive study of those nouns. Thereby, it aims to show that the theory of object classes is relevant to the contrastive study of languages. For this purpose, this article takes the following steps. First, it overviews the construction of the nouns’ object classes in Korean and French and, in so doing, clarifies the rationale of studying the nouns of size: the classes for the nouns of state need to be revised for an appropriate analysis of the nouns of property. Next, it examines the syntactic and semantic properties of the Korean and French nouns of size to show that they belong to the class of identifying properties, and that there is a correlation between them and the predicates of the class of attributive properties of size―for example, between the nouns of measurement and the adjectives indicating size values, such as long, court, and étendu. Finally, this article presents some of the subclasses of the nouns of size, which is built on the basis of the above-mentioned correlation.
참고문헌 (28)
- 노윤채, "기능동사와 서술명사에 대하여", ｢한국불어불문학회 동계학술대회, pp.217~229 (1999), 한국불어불문학회
- 이성헌, "전자사전 구축을 위한 언어기술의 한 방법 : 대상부류", 언어학, 30, pp.185~206 (2001), 한국언어학회
- 이성헌, "불어 '대칭' 명사의 통사·의미론적 특성 연구: '대칭' 명사의 대상부류 구축", 인문논총, (56), pp.277~332 (2006), 인문학연구원
- 이성헌, "세종 전자사전의 어휘의미부류 체계", 새국어생활, 17(3), pp.51~67 (2007), 국립국어원
- 이성헌, "세종 전자사전 개발의 성과와 전망", 새국어생활, 19(1), pp.59~77 (2009), 국립국어원
- 이성헌, "프랑스어 발화명사의 통사·의미 속성에 관한 연구 - 프랑스어 발화명사의 대상부류 구축 -", 프랑스어문교육, (33), pp.357~388 (2010), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- Anscombre, J. -C., "Morphologie et représentation événementielle: le cas des noms de sentiment et d'attitude", Langue française, 105, pp.40~54 (1995), Larousse
- Cordier, F., "Catégorisation et langage" (2002), Hermès SciencePublications
- Eshkol, I., "Typologie sémantique des prédicats de parole", 박사, pp.2002
- Flaux, N., "Les noms en français: esquisse de classement" (2000), Ophrys
- Giry-Schneider, J., "Noms de grandeur en avoir et Noms d'unités", Cahiers deGrammaire, 16, pp.27~49 (1991), Universtié de Toulouse-Le Mirail
- Giry-Schneider, J., "Sélection et sémantique: problèmes et modèles", Languefrançaise, 105, pp.5~14 (1996), Larousse
- Gross, G., "Forme d'un dictionnaire électronique", pp.255~272 (1992), Presses de l'Université du Québec
- Gross, G., "Classes d'objets et description des verbes", angages, 115, pp.15~30 (1994), Larousse
- Gross, G., "Prédicats nominaux et compatibilité aspectuelle", Langages, 121, pp.54~72 (1996), Larousse
- Gross, G., "Manuel d'analyse linguistique. Approche sémantico- syntaxique du lexique" (2012), Presses universitaires du Septentrion
- Gross, M., "Méthodes en syntaxe" (1975), Hermann
- Gross, M., "Les bases empiriques de la notion de prédicat sémantique", Langages, 63, pp.7~52 (1981), Larousse
- Gross, M., "La fonction sémantique des verbes supports", Travaux delinguistique, 39, pp.25~46 (1998), Duculot
- Kokochkina, I., "Typologie des prédicats d'états", 박사, pp.2004
- Lamprou, E., "Les noms de ≪reciprocite≫ en francais", 박사, pp.2005
- Le Pesant, D., "Vocabulaire des prédicats de grandeurs et des noms d’unités de mesure", Les Cahiers de Grammaire, 21, pp.45~74 (1996), Université de Toulouse
- Le Pesant D., "Introduction aux classes d'objets", Langages, 131, pp.6~33 (1998), Larousse
- Lee, S. -H., "Les classes d'objets d'événements. Pour une typologie sémantique des noms prédicatifs d'événement en français", 박사, pp.2001
- Lee, S. -H., "Some Problems in Constructing Semantic Classes for Korean Predicate Nouns", Language Research Special Issue, pp.77~93 (2003), ResearchInstitute, SNU
- Lee, S. -H., "A propos des noms de propriétés en coréen", Current Issues in Unity and Diversity of Languages (2009), The Linguistic Society of Korea
- Péchoin, D., "Thésaurus" (1992), Larousse
- Vivès, R., "Avoir, prendre, perdre: construction à verbe support et extensions aspectuelles", pp.1983