본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘의문사 … -냐면’ 구성에 대한 연구

A research on the construction‘Interrogative -nyamyeon’

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This research investigates the construction 'interrogative –nyamyeon' in Korean. Unlike the conventional quotation structure, the 'interrogative -nyamyeon' structure plays a unique role in explicitly presenting the topic and focus of the discourse. This is achieved through the strategic placement of an interrogative in the preceding clause, followed by the specification of its content in the subsequent element, effectively directing the reader's attention to the core of the discussion. Moreover, the construction can be extended beyond the sentence level and function as a discourse unit, which exhibits epiphenomenal effects. Notably, it contributes to the organization of turn-taking and the framing of discourse, thereby playing a supplementary role in guiding the flow of conversation and shaping the discourse's overall structure. The diverse functions of the construction can be understood in terms of a relationship akin to "[prospect of ongoing discourse] - [completion]." The topic-focus contains a question (QUD) and its corresponding answer, whereby the completion of the question occurs upon receiving a suitable response. Similarly, the organization of turn-taking is perceived as the completion of a discourse unit, fulfilling the expected topic of the ongoing discourse. Additionally, the framing of discourse serves as an indicator of the significance, with the subsequently provided content satisfying the criteria by the framing.

Abstract

This research investigates the construction 'interrogative –nyamyeon' in Korean. Unlike the conventional quotation structure, the 'interrogative -nyamyeon' structure plays a unique role in explicitly presenting the topic and focus of the discourse. This is achieved through the strategic placement of an interrogative in the preceding clause, followed by the specification of its content in the subsequent element, effectively directing the reader's attention to the core of the discussion. Moreover, the construction can be extended beyond the sentence level and function as a discourse unit, which exhibits epiphenomenal effects. Notably, it contributes to the organization of turn-taking and the framing of discourse, thereby playing a supplementary role in guiding the flow of conversation and shaping the discourse's overall structure. The diverse functions of the construction can be understood in terms of a relationship akin to "[prospect of ongoing discourse] - [completion]." The topic-focus contains a question (QUD) and its corresponding answer, whereby the completion of the question occurs upon receiving a suitable response. Similarly, the organization of turn-taking is perceived as the completion of a discourse unit, fulfilling the expected topic of the ongoing discourse. Additionally, the framing of discourse serves as an indicator of the significance, with the subsequently provided content satisfying the criteria by the framing.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 구현정, "조건과 주제", 언어, 14, pp.53~75 (1989)
  2. 김문기, "‘-면’ 통합형 어미의 유형과 특성", 우리말연구, (31), pp.85~109 (2012), 우리말학회
  3. 서태룡, "국어의 조건과 주제", 성심여자대학교 논문집, 13, pp.21~37 (1982), 성심여자대학교
  4. 구문을 중심으로-, "우리어문연구", 2015, 363~398, pp.우리어문학회, http:
  5. 이기갑, "국어 입말 담화의 의문 제기 형식", 담화와 인지, 9(2), pp.121~145 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
  6. 이성하, "영어와 한국어의 담화전략적 의사의문구문으로부터 화용표지로의 문법화", 2014년 언어과학회 동계 학술대회 발표논문집 (2014), 경북대학교
  7. 최윤지, "한국어 정보구조 연구" (2019), 태학사
  8. 최윤지, "구정보, 신정보란 무엇인가 -신구성의 구별과 정보구조적 조정-", 한국어학, 91, pp.95~126 (2021), 한국어학회[DOI]
  9. Caponigro, I., "Ask, and tell as well: Question–Answer Clauses in American Sign Language", Natural Language Semantics, 19, pp.323~371 (2011)
  10. Charolles, M., "Framing adverbials and their role in discourse cohesion from connexion to forward labelling", SEM-05 Proceedings, pp.13~30 (2005)
  11. Haiman, J., "Conditionals are topics", Language, 54(3), pp.564~589 (1978)
  12. Kimmelman, V., "Question-Answer Pairs in Sign Language of the Netherlands", Sign Language Studies, 17(4), pp.417~449 (2017)
  13. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics, "Roberts, C.", 91~136, pp.OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49 (1996)
  14. Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and cognition" (1986), Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)