한국어 종결어미 ‘-다니’에 관한 연구: 인용구문으로 환원 불가능한 경우를 중심으로
Korean sentential ending –tani: when it cannot be reduced into quotative constructions
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper deals with Korean sentential ending –tani, especially when it cannot be analyzed as a reduced form of a quotative construction containing a covert quotative verb (hereafter non-quotative –tani). Here I adopt Kang’s (2020) proposal, according to which non-quotative –tani can be used in three different constructions, that is, in rhetorical questions, in echo questions, and in exclamatives. Among these three usages, I begin with non-quotative –tani in rhetorical questions, and argue that –tani in rhetorical questions contains an evidential morpheme indicating that the speaker has best possible evidence for the embedded proposition. Then I further argue that this evidential takes a proposition whose denotation is not just a set of possible worlds, as usually assumed in standard formal semantics (Heim & Kratzer 1998, von Fintel & Heim 2020, among others), but a set of sets of possible worlds, as proposed in Inquisitive Semantics (Ciardelli et al. 2018, among others). Given this, I show that the rhetorical meaning of non-quotative –tani in questions can be compositionally derived by assuming that the speaker does not have any ground or evidence regarding any of the answers given in the extension of the question. Finally, I suggest that this proposal may be extended to other two usages of non-quotative –tani, which will result in a unified and more economic analysis of non-quotative –tani.
Abstract
This paper deals with Korean sentential ending –tani, especially when it cannot be analyzed as a reduced form of a quotative construction containing a covert quotative verb (hereafter non-quotative –tani). Here I adopt Kang’s (2020) proposal, according to which non-quotative –tani can be used in three different constructions, that is, in rhetorical questions, in echo questions, and in exclamatives. Among these three usages, I begin with non-quotative –tani in rhetorical questions, and argue that –tani in rhetorical questions contains an evidential morpheme indicating that the speaker has best possible evidence for the embedded proposition. Then I further argue that this evidential takes a proposition whose denotation is not just a set of possible worlds, as usually assumed in standard formal semantics (Heim & Kratzer 1998, von Fintel & Heim 2020, among others), but a set of sets of possible worlds, as proposed in Inquisitive Semantics (Ciardelli et al. 2018, among others). Given this, I show that the rhetorical meaning of non-quotative –tani in questions can be compositionally derived by assuming that the speaker does not have any ground or evidence regarding any of the answers given in the extension of the question. Finally, I suggest that this proposal may be extended to other two usages of non-quotative –tani, which will result in a unified and more economic analysis of non-quotative –tani.
참고문헌 (24)
- 강규영, "한국어 어미 ‘-다니’의 세 가지 용법", 한국어 의미학, 69, pp.219~251 (2020), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 강규영, "한국어 수사의문문의 두 유형에 대하여", 國語學, (103), pp.473~505 (2022), 국어학회[DOI]
- 김홍범, "‘-다면서’, ‘-다고’, ‘-다니’의 구조와 의미", 말, 12, pp.71~91 (1987)
- 박나리, "‘-다니’에 대한 한국어 교육문법적 기술방안 연구 -담화화용정보의 비교대조를 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (51), pp.45~80 (2013), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 손유정, "한국어 교육을 위한 복합종결어미 연구 －증거 양태를 중심으로－", 새국어교육, (113), pp.263~293 (2017), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 이소흔, "‘-다니’類에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 41(2), pp.125~149 (2013), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 이필영, "국어의 인용구문 연구" (1993), 탑출판사
- 이필영, "통사적 구성에서의 축약에 대하여 - ‘다-, 이라-, 더라-, 려-, 노라-’형을 중심으로 -", 국어학, 26, pp.1~32 (1995)
- 진관초, "한국어 의외성 표지 ‘-다니’에 대한 연구", 한국어 의미학, 54, pp.91~126 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- Aikhenvald, A., "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Ciardelli, I., "Inquisitive Semantics" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Caponigro, I., "Rhetorical questions as questions", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 11, pp.121~133 (2007)
- DeLancey, S., "Mirativity : the grammatical marking of unexpected information", Linguistic Typology, 1, pp.33~52 (1997)
- DeLancey, S., "The mirative and evidentiality", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.369~382 (2001)
- Faller, M., "Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua", Doctor, pp.2002
- von Fintel, K., "Intensional Semantics: a lecture note" (2020), MIT
- Gunlogson, C., "A question of commitment", Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp.101~136 (2008)
- Hamblin, C. L., "Questions in Montague English", Foundations of Language, 10, pp.41~53 (1973)
- Han, C. -H., "Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions", Lingua, 112(3), pp.201~229 (2002)
- Heim, I., "Semantics in Generative Grammar" (1998), Blackwell
- Karttunen, L., "Syntax and semantics in questions", Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, pp.3~44 (1977)
- Malamud, S., "Three ways to avoid commitments: declarative force modifiers in the conversational scoreboard", Journal of Semantics, 32, pp.275~311 (2015)
- Romero, M., "On negative yes", no questions, 2004, pp.27, 609~658
- Stalnaker, R., "Assertion", Syntax and Semantics, 9, pp.315~332 (1978)