소규모 사무공간의 조명에너지 절감율 평가에 관한 연구
Evaluation of Lighting Energy Saving Rate in a Small Office Space
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this study is to evaluate the lighting dimming rates with various parameters of the building skin in a small office. We compared to simulated workplane illuminance and measured workplane illuminance for the base model. After that, the five veriables(the presence of vertical wall in double skin facade, the presence of windowsill, window to wall ratio(WWR), window visible transmittance, the width of double skin facade) were applied to base model, and we analyzed the simulated lighting energy saving rates. The results are listed as below. The simulated workplane illuminance results are similar to the measurement. Simulated illuminance was smaller than measured illuminance by 16.5%(60 lx). In accordance with applicable building skin parameters, lighting energy saving rate results are summarized as follows. Lighting energy saving rate of case1(windowsill height 0.7m) is higher than that of base case(windowsill and vertical wall) by 7.3% and the lighting energy saving rate of case2(no vertical wall) is higher than that of base case by 7.6% and the lighting energy saving rate of case3(no windowsill and vertical wall) is higher than that of base case by 12.4%. The lighting energy saving rate is increased by 2.3%, when window visible transmittance is increased from 70% to 86%. The lighting energy saving rate is increased by 4.6%, when we changed the WWR 70% to 90%. Lighting energy savings rate is increased by 6.5%, when the width of double skin facade is reduced from 1m to 0.3m.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the lighting dimming rates with various parameters of the building skin in a small office. We compared to simulated workplane illuminance and measured workplane illuminance for the base model. After that, the five veriables(the presence of vertical wall in double skin facade, the presence of windowsill, window to wall ratio(WWR), window visible transmittance, the width of double skin facade) were applied to base model, and we analyzed the simulated lighting energy saving rates. The results are listed as below. The simulated workplane illuminance results are similar to the measurement. Simulated illuminance was smaller than measured illuminance by 16.5%(60 lx). In accordance with applicable building skin parameters, lighting energy saving rate results are summarized as follows. Lighting energy saving rate of case1(windowsill height 0.7m) is higher than that of base case(windowsill and vertical wall) by 7.3% and the lighting energy saving rate of case2(no vertical wall) is higher than that of base case by 7.6% and the lighting energy saving rate of case3(no windowsill and vertical wall) is higher than that of base case by 12.4%. The lighting energy saving rate is increased by 2.3%, when window visible transmittance is increased from 70% to 86%. The lighting energy saving rate is increased by 4.6%, when we changed the WWR 70% to 90%. Lighting energy savings rate is increased by 6.5%, when the width of double skin facade is reduced from 1m to 0.3m.
참고문헌 (7)
- 윤경희, "주광을 활용한 LED조명시스템의 컨트롤에 관한 실험적 연구", 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집, 10(6), pp.33~39 (2010), 한국생태환경건축학회
- 김한성, "소규모 사무공간에서 디밍제어를 이용한 조명에너지 절약에 관한 연구", 조명.전기설비학회논문지, 17(5), pp.15~21 (2003), 한국조명.전기설비학회
- Zack Rogers, "Daylighting Metric Development Using Daylight Autonomy Calculations in the Sensor Placement Optimization Tool", DHPS Daylighting Committee Daylighting Forum (2006), Architectural Energy Corporation
- Azza Nabil, "Useful Daylight Illuminances : A Replacement for Daylight Factors", Energy and Buildings, 38(7), pp.905~913 (2006)
- Reinhart CF, "Tutorial on the use of Daysim simulations for sustainable design" (2010), Harvard University
- Perez, "Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance", Solar Energy, 44(5), pp.271~289 (1990)
- A.H. Fakra, "A simple evaluation of global and diffuse luminous efficacy for all sky conditions in tropical and humid climate", Renewable Energy, 36(1), pp.298~306 (2011)