농촌마을 농특산물 포장디자인 개선을 위한 샤렛 개발 및 효과- 재능기부디자이너들의 의식변화를 중심으로 -
Development and Effectiveness Analysis of Charrette for Improving Agricultural Product Package Design in a Rural Village -Focusing on the Recognition Changes of Voluntary Designers-
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In these days, agricultural products are regarded as a core income source in tourism villages. Nevertheless, poor packaging of agricultural products has threatened the competitiveness and quality of products. For farmers, it is less likely to employ individual designer for developing and improving their packages due to low accessability to rural villages and budgets. Based on this background, this study conducted ‘Charrette’ in order to improve agricultural product packaging. The target village was ‘Goraday’ in Gangwon province. This study consisted of different steps for building and implementing proper ‘Charrette’ programs. Then, it also conducted empirical investigation about the effectiveness and efficiency of ‘Charrette’. ‘Charrette’ has made progress as follows; first step was concerned with advance preparation for constructing program. Second, implementation of ‘Charratte’ included data collection and analysis, and development of design. Third, evaluation and feedback stage have given presentation and discussion about suggested design with local residents. Empirical investigation about the effectiveness and efficiency of ‘Charrette’ has been composed with survey and interview targeting participants. In survey and interviews, designers were asked about their attitudinal changes in relation to knowledge, recognition, function, motivation, and satisfaction toward ‘Charrette’ and ‘agricultural product package design’ before and after participating the event. The results showed that knowledge and perception of designers toward ‘agricultural product package design’ have positively increased. In addition, it revealed that designers were satisfied with collaborations with others and their contribution to rural community business. However, the results also suggested that sufficient preparation time/schedules and opportunity to meet other and farmers before events would be required to have better communication and understanding in relation to their tasks and role distribution. Furthermore, it is also required for designers to hold relationship with local community in order to actualize their packaging design.
Abstract
In these days, agricultural products are regarded as a core income source in tourism villages. Nevertheless, poor packaging of agricultural products has threatened the competitiveness and quality of products. For farmers, it is less likely to employ individual designer for developing and improving their packages due to low accessability to rural villages and budgets. Based on this background, this study conducted ‘Charrette’ in order to improve agricultural product packaging. The target village was ‘Goraday’ in Gangwon province. This study consisted of different steps for building and implementing proper ‘Charrette’ programs. Then, it also conducted empirical investigation about the effectiveness and efficiency of ‘Charrette’. ‘Charrette’ has made progress as follows; first step was concerned with advance preparation for constructing program. Second, implementation of ‘Charratte’ included data collection and analysis, and development of design. Third, evaluation and feedback stage have given presentation and discussion about suggested design with local residents. Empirical investigation about the effectiveness and efficiency of ‘Charrette’ has been composed with survey and interview targeting participants. In survey and interviews, designers were asked about their attitudinal changes in relation to knowledge, recognition, function, motivation, and satisfaction toward ‘Charrette’ and ‘agricultural product package design’ before and after participating the event. The results showed that knowledge and perception of designers toward ‘agricultural product package design’ have positively increased. In addition, it revealed that designers were satisfied with collaborations with others and their contribution to rural community business. However, the results also suggested that sufficient preparation time/schedules and opportunity to meet other and farmers before events would be required to have better communication and understanding in relation to their tasks and role distribution. Furthermore, it is also required for designers to hold relationship with local community in order to actualize their packaging design.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강신겸, "농촌관광과 감성마케팅", ‘농촌관광, 개발이 아니라 경영이다’ 심포지엄자료 (2005), 농업기반공사
- 곽동화, "지역커뮤니티를 위한 참여형 디자인 프로세스의 평가에 관한 연구", 디자인학연구, 24(4), pp.119~130 (2011), 한국디자인학회
- 김경미, "한과 문화 체험학습이 중학생의 한과에 대한 지식과 태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 외식문화, pp.2011
- 김광현, "한국 패키지디자인의 개발전략" (1996), 도서출판 조형사
- 김기선, "농촌지역의 자연체험 환경교육이 환경보전의식 및 태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 환경교육, pp.2003
- 농수축산물 과대포장 방지방안 연구, "김수일", 농림수산식품부, ~ (2011)
- 김유경, "청소년 식생활 교육 중 농촌체험활동 효과", 석사, 전통식생활문화, pp.2011
- 김찬국, "백두대간 생태 복원을 위한 시민참여 프로그램 개발과 적용", 환경교육, 23(2), pp.1~15 (2010), 한국환경교육학회
- 나승일, "주말농장 참여의 교육적 가치에 관한 연구", 한국농업교육학회지, 32(2), pp.141~160 (2000)
- 2011 도시민 농촌관광 실태조사, "농촌진흥청", 농촌진흥청, ~ (2011)
- 박우장, "지역아동센터 개조 시 아동의 참여디자인 기법 및 도구에 관한 연구", KIEAE Journal, 12(2), pp.15~24 (2012), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
- 서귀숙, "수서영구임대단지 주거환경개선 방안제시를 위한 주민참여워크숍 과정에 관한 연구", 한국주거학회논문집, 22(3), pp.47~57 (2011), 한국주거학회
- 신나민, "학교 공간 개선에 있어 사용자 참여디자인이 갖는 효용성 및 참여방식에 관한 사례연구", 교육공학연구, 26(4), pp.171~189 (2010), 한국교육공학회
- 신지연, "표현생활중심의 숲유치원 교육 프로그램 개발 및 효과", 유아교육학논집, 16(1), pp.163~188 (2012), 한국영유아교원교육학회
- 신현경, "실시간 원격 참여적 디자인 워크숍에 관한 연구 : 워크숍 환경 변화에 따른 사용자 참여 비교를 중심으로", 석사, 산업디자인학, pp.2004
- 이정미, "어린이도서관에 있어서 이용자참여에 의한 디자인방법의 유용성에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 24(6), pp.161~171 (2008), 대한건축학회
- 이정언, "도시대형공원 주변부 공원복합용도지구 도입 모형 연구 : 랜드스케이프 어바니즘의 도시용도제 적용관점", 박사, 도시설계·조경학과 도시경관생태조경전공, pp.2012
- 이지혜, "웹 2.0 환경에 적용된 참여디자인 방법 사례연구 - 상호작용적 어플리케이션 사례를 중심으로 -", 디지털디자인학연구, 12(1), pp.341~350 (2012), 한국디지털디자인학회
- 이철희, "디자인시대의 감성농업", RDA 인테러뱅, (2) (2011), 농촌진흥청
- 임승빈, "조경계획 및 설계" (2004), 보문당
- 정경숙, "사용자참여 디자인방법을 적용한 아동가구디자인 개발 연구", 기초조형학연구, 13(5), pp.489~499 (2012), 한국기초조형학회[DOI]
- 정승우, "학교설계를 위한 사용자참여 디자인 프로세스 연구", 대한건축 학회: 계획계, 32(1), pp.167~168 (2012)
- 조정윤, "조경 샤렛 사례 연구-행정중 심복합도시 공원, 녹지 및 수변공간 경관기준 연구 학생 아이디어 디자인 샤렛을 중심으로-", 한국조경 학회 학술논문집, (1), pp.65~70 (2007)
- Amstrong, H, "참여디자인: 사용자와 디자이너가 함께 만드는 디자인" (2012), 비즈앤비즈
- Condon, P.M., "Design Charrettes for Sustainable Communities" (2008), Center for Resource Economics
- "Eco-Charrette, BetterBricks홈페이지" (2004)[URL]
- Final Report: a Visitor Capacity Charrette for Acadia National Park, "Hass, G.", Acadia National Park, ~ (2002)
- Lindsey, G., "a Handbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-Performance Projects" (2003), National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Sutton, S. E., "Children as Partners in Neighborhood Placemaking: Lessons from Intergenerational Design Charrettes", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, pp.171~189 (2002)
- Tanaka, T., "Using GIS in Community Design Charrettes : Lessons From a Japan-U. S. Collaboration in Earthquake Recovery and Mitigation Plaaning for Kobe", Habitat International, 33, pp.310~318 (2009)
- The National Charrette Institue, "The Charrette Handbook" (2006), American Planning Association
- "Oxford Dictionaries 홈페이지"[URL]
- Woolner, P., "Getting Together to Improve the School Environment : User Consultation, Participatory Design and Student Voice", Improving School, 10, pp.233~248 (2007)