농촌다운 주거환경 조성을 위한 평가항목 개발 및 중요도 분석-네트워크 분석과 AHP 분석 활용-
Development and importance analysis of evaluation factors for formation of future-oriented rural residential environment: using network analysis and AHP analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to develop the evaluation factors for formation of the future - oriented rural residential environment and to derive the importance of this evaluation factors. The main research methods are network analysis using Net-miner, AHP analysis and importance analysis for experts. The main research results are as follows. First, 6 factors for evaluation rural residential environment(environmental-sustainability, communality, self-reliance, aesthetic, enjoyment, settlement), 3 sub-factors of each factors, and key physical facilities(10 for rural center and 28 for rural villages) were derived by literature analysis and network analysis on it. Second, key priority factors that should be considered in physical formation of rural residential environment was deducted by AHP analysis. Improving accessibility of living services in the settlement factor, improvement of garbage collection and wastewater treatment system around the residential area, and ensuring topographic continuity in the environmental-sustainability factor was derived as a priority factors. Third, as a result of evaluation of the importance of physical facilities in the rural residential environment, there was a high demand for cultural welfare facilities in common. However, when compared with the villages where the harmony between the natural environment and the living environment is emphasized, convenience of living and accessibility of transportation were important in the rural center. These results suggest that solving the qualitative conditions as residential environment will help to attract new population. This study will contribute to enhance the qualitative level of the rural residential environment by suggesting strategic priority items when carrying out projects related to the rural residential environment creation in the future.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop the evaluation factors for formation of the future - oriented rural residential environment and to derive the importance of this evaluation factors. The main research methods are network analysis using Net-miner, AHP analysis and importance analysis for experts. The main research results are as follows. First, 6 factors for evaluation rural residential environment(environmental-sustainability, communality, self-reliance, aesthetic, enjoyment, settlement), 3 sub-factors of each factors, and key physical facilities(10 for rural center and 28 for rural villages) were derived by literature analysis and network analysis on it. Second, key priority factors that should be considered in physical formation of rural residential environment was deducted by AHP analysis. Improving accessibility of living services in the settlement factor, improvement of garbage collection and wastewater treatment system around the residential area, and ensuring topographic continuity in the environmental-sustainability factor was derived as a priority factors. Third, as a result of evaluation of the importance of physical facilities in the rural residential environment, there was a high demand for cultural welfare facilities in common. However, when compared with the villages where the harmony between the natural environment and the living environment is emphasized, convenience of living and accessibility of transportation were important in the rural center. These results suggest that solving the qualitative conditions as residential environment will help to attract new population. This study will contribute to enhance the qualitative level of the rural residential environment by suggesting strategic priority items when carrying out projects related to the rural residential environment creation in the future.
참고문헌 (13)
- Burholt, V., "‘Adref’: theoretical contexts of attachment to place for mature and older people in rural North Wales", Environment and Planning A, 38(6), pp.1095~1114 (2006)
- Paquette, S., "Changing ruralities, changing landscapes: exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach", Journal of rural studies, 19(4), pp.425~444 (2003)
- Sibella Kraus, "A Call for New Ruralism, Frameworks", ~ (2006)
- David Moffat, "New Ruralism : agriculture at the Metropolitan Edge", Places, 18(2), pp.72~75 (2006)
- Viviers, J., "Considering New Urbanism, New Ruralism And Green Urbanism In Response To Multifunctionality:The Case Of Verkykerskop, South Africa", WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, 223, pp.73~87 (2017)
- 이해진, "대안가치지향 귀농귀촌인의 사회적 특성과 역할", 농촌사회, 23(2), pp.49~90 (2013), 한국농촌사회학회
- 김한수, "예비 은퇴자의 주거환경 의식에 관한 연구 - 대구시민을 중심으로 -", 한국주거학회논문집, 25(1), pp.73~80 (2014), 한국주거학회[DOI]
- 김대식, "개발제한구역의 농촌마을 개발 전략 수립을 위한 주민수요조사 분석 - 대청호변 마을을 중심으로 -", Korean Journal of Agricultural Science, 37(3), pp.523~534 (2010), 농업과학연구소
- A study on the development of the assessment indicators of house and living environment infrastructure vulnerability in rural villages, "Park, M. L", Rural Research Institute, ~ (2017)
- A study on the development and application of the technology elements for residential environment in rural area, "Yoon, S. H", Rural Research Institute, ~ (2018)
- Indicators and Evaluations of the Quality of Residential Environments in Seoul, "Shin, S. Y", The Seoul Institute, ~ (2008)
- Development of Rural Public Space and Facilities Arrangement Manual, "Suh, J. H", Rural Development Administration, ~ (2016)
- Development and policy applications of indicators for identifying rural problems, "Kim, C. H", Korea Research Institute, ~ (2007)