AHP 기법을 이용한 농촌 커뮤니티 리질리언스 지표 도출 연구
Assessing Community Resilience in Rural Regions Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to introduce the concept of community resilience to rural society and build an index suitable for the reality of rural areas. Furthermore, by calculating the importance of evaluation factors, it was attempted to present priorities and alternatives for each evaluation factor. By stratifying the derived indicators, a survey was conducted targeting 20 researchers, practitioners, and public officials, three groups of experts working in rural areas who were well aware of the realities and problems of rural areas. In the survey, a pairwise comparison was performed to compare factors 1:1 to calculate the importance, and for rational and consistent decision-making, decisions were made in the 9-grade section. Using the collected data, consistency analysis that can evaluate reliability in the decision-making process and the relative weight of evaluation factors were calculated through AHP analysis. As a result of the analysis, as a result of examining the priority of final importance by summarizing the importance of all evaluation factors, ‘Income creation using resources’ > ‘Population Characteristics’ > ‘Tolerance’ > ‘External Support’ > ‘Social Accessibility’ > ‘Physical Accessibility’ > ‘Community Competence’ > ‘Infrastructure’ > ‘Leader Competence’ > ‘Natural Environment’ was derived in the order. In the study dealing with urban community resilience indicators, social aspects such as citizen participation, public-private cooperation, and governance were presented as the most important requirements, but this study differs in that the ‘income creation’ factor is derived as the most important factor. This can be seen through the change in the income difference between rural and urban areas. The income structure of rural areas has changed rapidly, and it is now reaching a very poor level, so it is necessary to prepare alternatives to ‘income creation’ in the case of rural areas. Unlike urban indicators, ‘population characteristics’ and ‘tolerance’ were also derived as important indicators of rural society. However, there are currently no alternatives to supplement the vulnerability by strengthening the resilience of rural communities. Based on the priority indicators derived from the study, we tried to suggest alternatives necessary for rural continuity in the future so that they can be supplemented step by step.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to introduce the concept of community resilience to rural society and build an index suitable for the reality of rural areas. Furthermore, by calculating the importance of evaluation factors, it was attempted to present priorities and alternatives for each evaluation factor. By stratifying the derived indicators, a survey was conducted targeting 20 researchers, practitioners, and public officials, three groups of experts working in rural areas who were well aware of the realities and problems of rural areas. In the survey, a pairwise comparison was performed to compare factors 1:1 to calculate the importance, and for rational and consistent decision-making, decisions were made in the 9-grade section. Using the collected data, consistency analysis that can evaluate reliability in the decision-making process and the relative weight of evaluation factors were calculated through AHP analysis. As a result of the analysis, as a result of examining the priority of final importance by summarizing the importance of all evaluation factors, ‘Income creation using resources’ > ‘Population Characteristics’ > ‘Tolerance’ > ‘External Support’ > ‘Social Accessibility’ > ‘Physical Accessibility’ > ‘Community Competence’ > ‘Infrastructure’ > ‘Leader Competence’ > ‘Natural Environment’ was derived in the order. In the study dealing with urban community resilience indicators, social aspects such as citizen participation, public-private cooperation, and governance were presented as the most important requirements, but this study differs in that the ‘income creation’ factor is derived as the most important factor. This can be seen through the change in the income difference between rural and urban areas. The income structure of rural areas has changed rapidly, and it is now reaching a very poor level, so it is necessary to prepare alternatives to ‘income creation’ in the case of rural areas. Unlike urban indicators, ‘population characteristics’ and ‘tolerance’ were also derived as important indicators of rural society. However, there are currently no alternatives to supplement the vulnerability by strengthening the resilience of rural communities. Based on the priority indicators derived from the study, we tried to suggest alternatives necessary for rural continuity in the future so that they can be supplemented step by step.
참고문헌 (31)
- Cho, H. S., "An Analysis of the Effect Structure of Local Activities on Community Resilience Recognitin, :Focusing in the Jang-wi Regeneration Zone", pp.2019
- 조윤주, "AHP를 이용한 의복평가기준의 우선순위 분석", 한국의류산업학회지, 9(1), pp.81~88 (2007), 한국의류산업학회
- Choi, B. S., "Symposium on the Modern Society and Risk Management ; Characteristics of and the Strategic Response to Risk Problems", Korean Administrative Research, 3(4), pp.4027~4049 (1994)
- Folke, C., "Resilience : The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses", Global environmental change, 16(3), pp.253~267 (2006)
- A Study on the Examination and Application of Regional Resilience for Sustainable Development, "Ha, S. J.", Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, ~, pp.Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, 2014-15 (2014)
- Jeon, D.Y., "The concept and application of community resilience", Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (2015)
- 전은영, "기후변화에 대응하기 위한 커뮤니티 리질리언스 평가지표 개발과 적용", 국토지리학회지, 51(1), pp.47~58 (2017), 국토지리학회
- Jo, G. T., "Hierarchical decision-makin", pp.3~17 (2003), DONGHYUN Publishing
- The 4th Basic Plan for Sustainable Development2021-2040, "Jointly with Related Ministries", ~ (2021)
- 정은주, "도시의 지속가능성(Sustainability)과 리질리언스(Resilience)에관한 연구", 한국지역개발학회지, 28(4), pp.87~108 (2016), 한국지역개발학회
- 강상준, "사회적 비용을 고려한 자연재해로부터 커뮤니티회복탄력성 개념의 재정립", GRI연구논총, 16(1), pp.321~342 (2014), 재단법인 경기연구원
- Kim, D. S., "Three Thesises on the Rural Community Capacity", pp.2018
- 김대욱, "읍면동 법적지위 전환문제의 개선방안 연구", 지방행정연구, 33(2), pp.33~52 (2019), (재) 한국지방행정연구원[DOI]
- 김재현, "농촌 마을단위 지속가능성 지표개발을 위한 델파이 연구", 농촌관광연구, 17(2), pp.1~25 (2010), 한국농촌관광학회
- Kim, J. S., "Social innovation to solve rural problems", SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POLICY, 24(2), pp.24~36 (2014)
- 김정연, "농촌지역의 특성 분석 및 유형화 - 충청남도 읍·면지역을 중심으로 -", 한국지역개발학회지, 26(1), pp.27~44 (2014), 한국지역개발학회
- 김원배, "한국의 경제위기와 지역 탄력성", 국토연구, 79, pp.3~21 (2013), 국토연구원[DOI]
- A study on multi-criteria analysis method for preliminary feasibility study, "Korea Development Institute(KDI)", ~ (2000)
- Efficient Use Vacant Facilities for Regional Development, "Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements(KRIHS)", ~ (2018)
- Developing the Performance Evaluation Strategies for the Agricultural Policy With AHP analysis, "Korea Rural Economic Institute(KREI)", ~, pp.C2007-53 (2007)
- 이정원, "농촌어메니티 자원의 농촌다움 특성평가에 관한 연구", 농촌계획, 12(2), pp.1~9 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- Longstaff, P. H., "Building resilient communities : A preliminary framework for assessment", Homeland security affairs, 6(3), pp.1~23 (2010)
- Meerow, S., "Defining urban resilience : A review", Landscape and urban planning, 147, pp.38~49 (2016)
- Understanding and activation of local communities, "Ministry of Public Administration and Security(MOSPA)", ~ (2017)
- 남수연, "불확실성 시대 지역공동체 개발에 대한 지역공동체 리질리언스적 접근", 한국지역개발학회지, 30(3), pp.39~64 (2018), 한국지역개발학회
- National Statistical Office, "2020 Agricultural, Forestry and Fisheries Census", ~ (2021)
- Park, K. S., "An Evaluation for the Investment Priority of Bikeway by Type using AHP analysis", pp.2016
- Park, J. U., "Evaluation of resilience using simulation technique under climate change : a case study for Incheon City", pp.2017
- Saaty, T. L., "The Logic of Priorities" (1982), Kluwer-NijhoffPublishing
- Vargas, L. G., "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications", European Journal Operational Research, pp.2~8 (1990)[DOI]
- Walker, B., "Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems", Ecology and Society, 9(2), pp.5~ (2004)