AHP법을 이용한 효율적인 농촌중심지의 정주계층 구분 방안 - 경상남도 고성군·하동군을 중심으로 -
Efficient Classification of Settlement Hierarchy in Rural Centers Using the AHP Method
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study suggested a method of classifying the hierarchy of settlement of rural centers to select a target site for Rural Development Projects and an improvement plan to reflect the results of centrality analysis in the project. Based on the guidelines for the promotion of Rural Development Projects, evaluation items for the classification of settlements hierarchy were constructed, and an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) importance survey evaluation table was created. Since the evaluation grade interval is set differently depending on the purpose of evaluation and the evaluator, in this study, relative grade classification by statistical methods and grade classification by determining the presence or absence of evaluation factors were used as the type of grade classification of evaluation criteria. The evaluation results were derived by applying the functional index method, the modified function index method reflecting the AHP survey results, and the evaluation score reflecting the AHP weighting value and evaluation grade to the case area. As three evaluation methods, the hierarchy of settlements in the rural center of the case area were divided into four stages. The hierarchical classification by the functional index method is arranged in the order of the highest functional index, and the central class is classified by disconnection, so differences may occur depending on the evaluator. However, in the case of evaluation using evaluation scores, the hierarchy is clearly distinguished based on a total of 100, so that the difference between evaluators can be reduced, and the hierarchy distinction by Eup/Myeon in rural centers can be clearly distinguished. If the AHP hierarchy of settlement and evaluation score reflecting the evaluation grade presented in the study are used, it is easy to identify facilities that are insufficient or need to be improvement in each rural centers and establish a business plan. In the future, it is expected that it can be used in rural development practice if the scope of experts is expanded to supplement evaluation items and importance evaluation, and if the evaluation grade is set by analyzing functional facility data in Gyeongsangnam-do or rural centers of nationwide.
Abstract
This study suggested a method of classifying the hierarchy of settlement of rural centers to select a target site for Rural Development Projects and an improvement plan to reflect the results of centrality analysis in the project. Based on the guidelines for the promotion of Rural Development Projects, evaluation items for the classification of settlements hierarchy were constructed, and an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) importance survey evaluation table was created. Since the evaluation grade interval is set differently depending on the purpose of evaluation and the evaluator, in this study, relative grade classification by statistical methods and grade classification by determining the presence or absence of evaluation factors were used as the type of grade classification of evaluation criteria. The evaluation results were derived by applying the functional index method, the modified function index method reflecting the AHP survey results, and the evaluation score reflecting the AHP weighting value and evaluation grade to the case area. As three evaluation methods, the hierarchy of settlements in the rural center of the case area were divided into four stages. The hierarchical classification by the functional index method is arranged in the order of the highest functional index, and the central class is classified by disconnection, so differences may occur depending on the evaluator. However, in the case of evaluation using evaluation scores, the hierarchy is clearly distinguished based on a total of 100, so that the difference between evaluators can be reduced, and the hierarchy distinction by Eup/Myeon in rural centers can be clearly distinguished. If the AHP hierarchy of settlement and evaluation score reflecting the evaluation grade presented in the study are used, it is easy to identify facilities that are insufficient or need to be improvement in each rural centers and establish a business plan. In the future, it is expected that it can be used in rural development practice if the scope of experts is expanded to supplement evaluation items and importance evaluation, and if the evaluation grade is set by analyzing functional facility data in Gyeongsangnam-do or rural centers of nationwide.
참고문헌 (22)
- "2study sites (Goseong-gun, 2022, Hadong-gun, 2024)(preliminary) master plan", ~ (2022)
- Cho, Y. J., "Central Function Analysis in the Saemangeum Area", Journal of Agriculture&Life Science, 41(1), pp.29~34 (2007)
- Cho, Y.J., "A Study on Establishment of Rural Living Service Functions by hierarchy of settlement", 29(4), pp.13~26 (2023)
- Choi, S. M., "Resources Evaluation System for Rural Planning Purposes(Ⅲ)-Rating Tabulation for Rural Resources Evaluation Items-", Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 4(1), pp.75~85 (1998)
- Choi, S. M., "Settlement System Remodeling under Functional Change of Rural Centers", Journal Of The Korean Society Of Rural Planning, 9(2), pp.39~47 (2003)
- Choi, S. M., "Rural Planning", pp.81~89 (2011), Dong Myeong Publishers
- Choi, Y. W., "The Classification and Activation Strategy of Rural Development Projects", Master, pp.2010
- Choi, Y. W., "Designing Optimal Workload and Cost for Efficient Implementation of the Regional Community Reinforcement Project", Doctor, pp.2015
- Choi, Y. W., "An Estimation of the Standard Cost of Project Management of Empowerment Sector in Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project", Journal of Korea Society of Rural Planning, 19(3), pp.131~144 (2013)
- Christaller, W., "Central Places in Southern Germany" (1966), Prentice-Hall
- Chung, H. W., "Rural Planning", pp.146~159 (1999), Dong Myeong Publishers
- Davies, W. K. D., "Centrality and the Central Place Hierarchy, Urban Studies", Urban Studies Journal Limited, 4(1), pp.61~79 (1967)
- Kim, S. W., "Analysis of the centrality of rural centers-Case of Gimje region-", The Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 27(1), pp.51~62 (1995)
- A Study on the Activation Plan of Complete Region in Rural Development Project, "Kim, Y. J", Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 21~ (2014)
- Rural Area Centrality Derivation and Central Classification Study in Cheonan-si, "Lee, S. J.", Chungnam Institute, 1~9 (2016)
- Modernization of Residential Space in Declining Population Areas and Improvement of Living Service Support System, "Lee, S. Y.", Korea Research Institute for Local Administration, 139~177, pp.Policy research 2017-3 (2017)
- A Study on the Activation Plan of Complete Region in Rural Development Project, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)", 25~26 (2014)
- Rural Development Project Presentation Document, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)", ~ (2014)
- Plan of Rural Convention 2022, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)", ~ (2022)
- Guidelines for the Implementation of the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Projects, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)", ~ (2024)
- Park, Y. H., "Spatial Structure of the Rural Service Centers in Gimje Region, Korea", Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 10(1), pp.1~15 (1975)
- Shim, J. S., "The Spatial Structure of Rural Centeral Place", Master, pp.1989