농업ㆍ농촌의 사회ㆍ문화적 기능 가치 평가
Assessing Economic Value of Social-cultural Function of Korean Agriculture
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although the demand and awareness of public regarding social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas would increase recently, the sustainability of them has continuously decreased. To derive policy directions for improvements of social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas, This study analyzed willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas and its determinants by uisng contigent valuation method. The results show that the willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas is positively affected by awareness of the importance of agriculture, interest in problems regarding agriculture in Korea, awareness of social functions of agriculture, and experience in rural life. These results would imply that policies for the improvement of public awareness and experiences increase the value of social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas. In addition, the results imply that more diverse education programs and activities are required in order to change awareness of future generations in response to decreases in population having experiences in agriculture and rural life due to urbanization. Lastly, the results show that the average willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas is about 35,600 won, and total willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas is about 998.3 billion won. This is much larger than the government budget on enhancement of social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas in 2019. This difference between government budget and the total willingness to pay implies that Korean government would be required more positive policies to maintain and enhance social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas.
Abstract
Although the demand and awareness of public regarding social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas would increase recently, the sustainability of them has continuously decreased. To derive policy directions for improvements of social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas, This study analyzed willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas and its determinants by uisng contigent valuation method. The results show that the willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas is positively affected by awareness of the importance of agriculture, interest in problems regarding agriculture in Korea, awareness of social functions of agriculture, and experience in rural life. These results would imply that policies for the improvement of public awareness and experiences increase the value of social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas. In addition, the results imply that more diverse education programs and activities are required in order to change awareness of future generations in response to decreases in population having experiences in agriculture and rural life due to urbanization. Lastly, the results show that the average willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas is about 35,600 won, and total willingness to pay for social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas is about 998.3 billion won. This is much larger than the government budget on enhancement of social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas in 2019. This difference between government budget and the total willingness to pay implies that Korean government would be required more positive policies to maintain and enhance social-cultural functions of agriculture and rural areas.
참고문헌 (24)
- 안윤수, "농촌의 사회문화적 공익기능 가치 평가", 농촌사회, 15(1), pp.175~214 (2005), 한국농촌사회학회
- Blamey, R. K., "Yea-saying in contingent valuation surveys", Land Economics, 75, pp.126~141 (1999)
- Cameron, T. A., "Estimating willingness to pay from survey data : an alternative pre-test-market evaluation procedure", Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), pp.389~395 (1987)
- Czajkowski, M., "Addressing empirical challenges related to the incentive compatibility of stated preferences methods", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, pp.47~63 (2017)
- 허정회, "지속가능한 농업 발전에 대한 영향 요인 분석", 농업경영.정책연구, 45(4), pp.721~741 (2018), 한국농식품정책학회[DOI]
- Public Opinion Survey on Agriculture and Rural Areas, "Heo, J.H.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2019)
- Hole AR, "A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures", Health Economics, 16, pp.827~840 (2007)
- 황정임, "농촌 사회문화적 공익기능의 경제적 가치", 농촌지도와 개발, 16(3), pp.647~673 (2009), 한국농촌지도학회
- Johnston, R. J., "Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies", Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), pp.319~405 (2017)
- Jourdain, D., "Valuation of ecosystem services provided by irrigated rice agriculture in Thailand: a choice experiment considering attribute nonattendance", Agricultural Economics, 48(5), pp.655~667 (2017)
- Kallas, Z., "Are citizens willing to pay for agricultural multifunctionality?", Agricultural Economics, 36(3), pp.405~419 (2007)
- The Evaluation of Agricultural Multifunctionality –Focused on Sustainable Livestock Production, "Kim, S. S.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2018)
- The Valuation of the Economic and Public Values of Agriculture and Rural Area in Korea, "Kim, Y. R.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2013)
- 공기서, "기후변화를 고려한 논농업의 다원적 기능 가치", 농업경영.정책연구, 40(2), pp.352~380 (2013), 한국농식품정책학회
- Krinsky, I., "On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), pp.715~719 (1986)
- 권오상, "논농업의 경관가치평가", 농업경제연구, 45(2), pp.235~261 (2004), 한국농업경제학회
- 임형백, "농촌사회의 경관기능 유지에 대한 가치 평가", 한국지역개발학회지, 16(3), pp.25~48 (2004), 한국지역개발학회
- Moon, W., "Assessing Holistic Economic Value for Multifunctional Agriculture in the US", Food Policy, 36(4), pp.455~465 (2011)
- Valuation of Multifunctionality of Agriculture, "Oh, S. I.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2001)
- Randall, A, "Valuing the outputs of multifunctional agriculture", European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3), pp.289~307 (2002)
- The policy Agenda and Direction for Enhancing Multifunctionality in Agriculture, "Rhew, C. H.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2018)
- Evaluation of environmental conservation and landscape value of paddy agriculture, "Seo, D. K.", Rural Development Administration, ~ (2002)
- Vossler, C. A., "Truth in consequentiality: theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments", American Economic Journal : Microeconomics, 4(4), pp.145~171 (2012)
- Zawojska, A, "The Economic and Social Justifications for Public Spending to Agriculture : Theoretical Insights and Empirical Observations", Oeconomia, 12(4), pp.133~143 (2013)