본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공익기능 증진 직접지불의 농가수용의사금액 측정

Measuring Farmers’ Willingness to Accept of DirectPayment for Increasing Public Benefit

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to estimate farmers’ willingness to accept (WTA) of direct payment for increasing public benefit using the contingent valuation method. The double-bounded dichotomous choice and the open-ended question were used to measure WTAs for basic form and optional form, respectively. The results show that WTA for basic form was inversely proportional to the acreage. WTAs were KRW 1,694,001 with 2 ha or less, KRW 1,617,789 with over 2 ha~6 ha, and KRW 1,562,977 with over 6 ha. The results also indicate that WTAs for optional form are similar to payments of agricultural environmental conservation program except physical (chemical) control of pests and weed. The results of this study can provide useful information for the establishment of direct payment for increasing public benefit.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to estimate farmers’ willingness to accept (WTA) of direct payment for increasing public benefit using the contingent valuation method. The double-bounded dichotomous choice and the open-ended question were used to measure WTAs for basic form and optional form, respectively. The results show that WTA for basic form was inversely proportional to the acreage. WTAs were KRW 1,694,001 with 2 ha or less, KRW 1,617,789 with over 2 ha~6 ha, and KRW 1,562,977 with over 6 ha. The results also indicate that WTAs for optional form are similar to payments of agricultural environmental conservation program except physical (chemical) control of pests and weed. The results of this study can provide useful information for the establishment of direct payment for increasing public benefit.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Bishop, R. C, "Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased?", Am. J. Agric, 61(5), pp.926~930 (1979)
  2. EPRS, "Common Agricultural Policy 2014-2020: Direct payments. European Parliamentary Research Service", European Union Publishing (2016)[DOI]
  3. Freeman, A. M, "The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Value: Theory and Methods", pp.40~76 (2014), Resources for the Future
  4. Hanemann, W. M, "Statistical Efficiency of Double- Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation", Am. J. Agric, 73(4), pp.1255~1263 (1991)
  5. 지인배, "ESTIMATING WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR LIVESTOCK INDUSTRY SUPPORT POLICIES TO SOLVE LIVESTOCK’S EXTERNALITY PROBLEMS IN KOREA", 농촌경제, 37(4), pp.97~116 (2014), 한국농촌경제연구원[DOI]
  6. Reorganizing Direct Payment Program for Environment-friendly Agriculture in Chungnam According to the Change of Agricultural Environmental Policy in Research Report, "Kang, M, Y", ChungNam Institute, 74~103 (2018)
  7. Enlargement and Reform of Public Benefit Direct Payment System-Detailed Plan for Reform of Agricultural Direct Payment System in Research Report, "Kim, T. H", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 69~201 (2018)
  8. Kim, T. Y, "The Implication and Challenge of Public Benefit Direct Payment", Agricultural Policy, 69, pp.60~106 (2019), Center for Food, Agricultural & Rural Policy
  9. Measures for Sustainable Agriculture: Public Benefit Direct Payment, "Kim, T. Y", GS&J Institute, 1~16, pp.Research Report. 234 (2017)
  10. Study on the Introduction of Agricultural Environment Conservation Programs in Research Report, "Lim. Y. A. and J. W. Cho", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 71~108 (2017)
  11. 이충기, "추가질문에 의한 가상가치 수정을 통한 서울빛초롱축제의 체험가치 평가", 관광연구저널, 31(3), pp.5~19 (2017), 한국관광연구학회[DOI]
  12. 이동현, "농촌형 커뮤니티 비즈니스의 사회경제적 가치 평가 : 경남 사례를 중심으로", 농업경영.정책연구, 43(2), pp.370~398 (2016), 한국농식품정책학회
  13. "Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries" (2014)[URL]
  14. MAFRA, "Inside Data" (2019), Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affair
  15. Mitchell, R. C, "Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method" (1989), Resource for the Future
  16. OECD, "The Political Economy of Biodiversity Policy Reform" (2017), OECD Publishing
  17. Tobin, J, "Esitmation of Relationship for Limited Dependent Variables", Economertrica, 26, pp.24~36 (1958)
  18. "Environmental Benefits of the US CRP 2017" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)