본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

AHP에 의한 한국자동차부품제조사의 제조성과기준의 중요도 평가

An AHP Approach to Evaluate the priorities of Manufacturing Performance Criteria in Korean Automobile Parts Manufacturing Company

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

The critical role played by manufacturing performance measurement systems in achieving competitive success is increasingly recognized. Developing an integrated performance measurement model is significant for strategic management. This study consist of several principal steps. Performance criteria from the literature and an questionnaire were utilized prior to building the performance model. The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is utilized to evaluate the weight of each criterion when generating the performance measurement model for Korea automobile parts manufacturing company. AHP analysis showed clear difference in the priority between 5 criteria and 24 sub-criteria in terms of manufacturing performance of Korean automobile parts manufacturing company. The result of priority evaluation in the 5 criteria of 2nd level was ranked quality, cost, delivery, employee, flexibility. And the critical sub-criteria in the 24 sub-criteria of 3rd level was ranked claim rate, process defect rate, outsourcing parts defect rate, ability to quality management innovation, claim cost, etc.

Abstract

The critical role played by manufacturing performance measurement systems in achieving competitive success is increasingly recognized. Developing an integrated performance measurement model is significant for strategic management. This study consist of several principal steps. Performance criteria from the literature and an questionnaire were utilized prior to building the performance model. The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is utilized to evaluate the weight of each criterion when generating the performance measurement model for Korea automobile parts manufacturing company. AHP analysis showed clear difference in the priority between 5 criteria and 24 sub-criteria in terms of manufacturing performance of Korean automobile parts manufacturing company. The result of priority evaluation in the 5 criteria of 2nd level was ranked quality, cost, delivery, employee, flexibility. And the critical sub-criteria in the 24 sub-criteria of 3rd level was ranked claim rate, process defect rate, outsourcing parts defect rate, ability to quality management innovation, claim cost, etc.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 박진영, "의료 서비스산업의 성과측정에 관한 연구", 생산성논집, 22(2), pp.51~79 (2008), 한국생산성학회
  2. 오중산, "제조유연성과 성과 간의 인과관계: 자동차 부품산업과 전자 부품산업을 대상으로 한 실증연구", 경영학연구, 39(2), pp.309~340 (2010), 한국경영학회
  3. 조근태, "계층분석적 의사결정" (2003), 동현출판사
  4. 조홍재, "중소기업들의 생산성 문제 및 지표분류", 대한산업공학회, 2010, ~
  5. 2011년 자동차산업 주요 이슈, "한국자동차산업연구소", KARI, ~, pp.Report(2011-1) (2011)
  6. Abdel-Maksoud,A.B, "Manufacturing in the UK:Contemporary Characteristics and Performance Indicators", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(2), pp.155~171 (2004)
  7. Ahmad.M.M, "Establishing and Improving Manufacturing Performance Measures", Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18, pp.171~176 (2002)
  8. Chenhall,R.H, "Strategies of Manufacturing Flexibility,Manufacturing Performance Measures and Organizational Performance:An Empirical Investigation", Integrated Manu-facturing System, 7(5), pp.25~32 (1996)
  9. El Mola,Khaled M, "a Methodology to Measure the Performance of Manufacturing Systems", 박사, pp.2004
  10. Ghalayini,A.M, "An Integrated Dynamic Performance Measure-ment System", International Journal of production economics, 48, pp.207~225 (1997)
  11. Leong,G.K, "Research in the Process and Content of Manufacturing Strategy", OMEGA, 18(2), pp.109~122 (1990)
  12. Lee,A.H.I, "a Fuzzy AHP and BSC Approach for Evaluating Performance of IT Department in the Manufacturing Industry in Tiwan", Expert systems with Applications, 34(1), pp.96~107 (2008)
  13. Liu,S.T, "Slack-Based Efficiency Measures for Predicting Bank Performance", Expert systems with applications, 36(2), pp.2813~2818 (2008)
  14. Maskell,B.H, "Performance measurement for world class manufacturing" (1991), Productivity Press
  15. Saaty,R.W, "Decision Making in Complex Environments the Analytic Hierarchy Process" (2003), McGraw-Hill
  16. Skinner,W, "Manufacturing-Missing Link in Corporate Strategy", Harvard Business Review, 47, pp.130~145 (1969)
  17. Wang,W.K, "Design of a Knowledge Based Performance Evaluation System:a Case of High-tech State-owned Enterprises in an Emerging economy", Expert systems with Applications, 34(3), pp.1795~1803 (2008)
  18. White,G.P, "A Survey and Taxonomy Strategy Related Performance Measures for Manufacturing", International Journal of Production and Production Management, 16(3), pp.42~61 (1996)
  19. Yuan,F.C, "A Hierarchical Design of Case-Based Reasoning in the Balanced Scorecard Application", Expert systems with Applications, 36(1), pp.333~342 (2007)
  20. Yurdakul,M, "Measuring a Manufacturing Systemʼs Performance Using Saatyʼs System with Feedback Approach", Integrated Manufacturing System, 13(1), pp.25~34 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)