전사적 PL 대응시스템의 핵심요인이 기업 성과에 미치는 영향
Effects of Essential Companywide Components of PL Response System on Company’s PL Performance
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PL (Product Liability) refers to the legal responsibility of a manufacturer or seller for bodily injuries or property losses caused by product defects. Therefore, it is important for companies to construct a product liability response system that strategically manage and effectively adapt to product liability. A PL response system refers to companywide operations of PL prevention (PLP) measures, product safety (PS) measures, and PL defense (PLD) measures appropriate for a company’s scale and environment. To establish an enterprise product liability response system, each essential component of corporations should be systematically operated and maintained considering the scale and characteristics of the corporations. Essential components of PL response system is Strategy, Organization, Training, Technology, Investment, and Awareness. Role of essential components is that companies need specific strategies to secure product safety and protect customers from product defects, and appropriate organizations must be composed for effective operation of such strategies. The objective of this paper seeks to examine the relationships among the essential components of the product liability response system and PL performance. PL performance consists of positive performance and negative performance. In particular, positive performance include increased efforts in product or process innovation such as strengthening research and development (R&D) to produce safer products without defects. In order to carry out this research we obtained 98 questionnaire of manufacturing company. A summary of the analyses is as follows: First, the awareness and technology among essential components affect significantly to the positive performance. Second, the awareness and strategy among essential components negative affect to the negative performance.
Abstract
PL (Product Liability) refers to the legal responsibility of a manufacturer or seller for bodily injuries or property losses caused by product defects. Therefore, it is important for companies to construct a product liability response system that strategically manage and effectively adapt to product liability. A PL response system refers to companywide operations of PL prevention (PLP) measures, product safety (PS) measures, and PL defense (PLD) measures appropriate for a company’s scale and environment. To establish an enterprise product liability response system, each essential component of corporations should be systematically operated and maintained considering the scale and characteristics of the corporations. Essential components of PL response system is Strategy, Organization, Training, Technology, Investment, and Awareness. Role of essential components is that companies need specific strategies to secure product safety and protect customers from product defects, and appropriate organizations must be composed for effective operation of such strategies. The objective of this paper seeks to examine the relationships among the essential components of the product liability response system and PL performance. PL performance consists of positive performance and negative performance. In particular, positive performance include increased efforts in product or process innovation such as strengthening research and development (R&D) to produce safer products without defects. In order to carry out this research we obtained 98 questionnaire of manufacturing company. A summary of the analyses is as follows: First, the awareness and technology among essential components affect significantly to the positive performance. Second, the awareness and strategy among essential components negative affect to the negative performance.
참고문헌 (18)
- 장석주, "제조물 결함사고에 따른 제조물책임 관리활동 방안", 대한설비관리학회지, 15(2), pp.95~102 (2010), 대한설비관리학회
- 홍한국, "S사의 PL대응전략 및 시스템에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 31(1), pp.62~75 (2003), 한국품질경영학회
- 황현영, "제조물책임법 개정 논의에 따른 제조물책임보험의 개선방안 연구", 비교사법, 20(2), pp.331~366 (2013), 한국비교사법학회
- Kim, C, "A Study on the Effects of Safety Quality Activities on Management Performance", pp.2012
- 권오성, "제조물배상책임 리스크 관리기법과 성과와의 관계 분석", 산업경제연구, 21(5), pp.2353~2370 (2008), 한국산업경제학회
- 권상로, "독일의 제조물책임에 관한 법적 연구", 한양법학, 25(1), pp.79~97 (2014), 한양법학회
- 이상미, "제조물 책임법(Product Liability)에 대한 외식업체의 대응방안", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 5(5), pp.219~227 (2005), 한국콘텐츠학회
- "NEWS of Fair Trade Commission"[URL]
- 박병권, "전사적 제조물책임활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국산업정보학회논문지, 11(1), pp.58~68 (2006), 한국산업정보학회
- 박병권, "제품안전을 위한 TQM활동, 전사적PL활동, PL성과의 관계에 관한 연구", 경영연구, 20(4), pp.151~174 (2005), 한국산업경영학회
- 박노국, "중소기업의 제조물 책임(PL) 대응실태에 관한 연구", 대한안전경영과학회지, 12(4), pp.99~105 (2010), 대한안전경영과학회
- 박태현, "가습기 살균제 사건과 국가배상책임", 환경법과 정책, 16, pp.35~56 (2016), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
- "Safety Korea, Korea Agency for Technology and Standards Vol. 4", ~ (2014)
- 서준혁, "PEST-SWOT-AHP 분석을 이용한 중소제조기업의 제조물책임 대응전략 수립", 산업경영시스템학회지, 39(2), pp.11~18 (2016), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- Seo, J.H., "Identifying Industry-Specific Components of Product Liability Response System Using DELPHI-AHP Method", Management and Production Engineering Review, 7(4), pp.27~38 (2016)
- 서준혁, "AHP기법을 활용한 제조물책임 대응시스템 구축요인의 전략적 우선순위 도출에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 42(2), pp.235~252 (2014), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 송정은, "가습기 살균제 사건의 민사적 쟁점: 제조물책임과 인과관계 입증", 환경법과 정책, 16, pp.1~33 (2016), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
- Song, J.H., "Product Liability Law and Corporate Strategies" (2002), Seongandang Publisher
