조종적성 검사/연구 장비 운용 Console의 인간공학적 개선
Ergonomic Improvement of Operation Console for Pilot Aptitude Research Equipment
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Pilot Aptitude Research Equipment (PARE) is a simulator developed to measure or research pilot aptitude and train for student pilots. Design of an ergonomic PARE operation console is required to operate the equipment effectively. This study carried out five steps : (S1) operator questionnaire survey, (S2) anthropometric design formula development, (S3) usability evaluation, (S4) improvement design, and (S5) validation considering both Physical User Interface (PUI) and Graphic User Interface (GUI) of PARE operation console. The operator questionnaire surveyed needs for each PUI and GUI part of the console from two PARE actual operators. In terms of PUI, the anthropometric design formula was developed by using design variables, body dimensions, target population characteristics, and reference posture related to the PARE console. In terms of GUI, the usability evaluation was conducted by three usability testing experts with a 7-point scale (1 : very low, 4 : neutral, 7 : very high) on GUI of the PARE operation console by seven usability criteria. The improved PARE operation console was designed to reflect the optimal values of design variables calculated from design formula, the results from usability testing, and the operator’s needs. The improvement effect was observed by 20 people who had experience with the PARE operation console. As a result of the validation, monitor visibility and cockpit visibility for the improved PUI design and visibility and efficiency for the improved GUI design were significantly increased by more than 90% respectively. The improved design of the PARE operation console in this study can contribute to enhance operation performance of the PARE.
Abstract
Pilot Aptitude Research Equipment (PARE) is a simulator developed to measure or research pilot aptitude and train for student pilots. Design of an ergonomic PARE operation console is required to operate the equipment effectively. This study carried out five steps : (S1) operator questionnaire survey, (S2) anthropometric design formula development, (S3) usability evaluation, (S4) improvement design, and (S5) validation considering both Physical User Interface (PUI) and Graphic User Interface (GUI) of PARE operation console. The operator questionnaire surveyed needs for each PUI and GUI part of the console from two PARE actual operators. In terms of PUI, the anthropometric design formula was developed by using design variables, body dimensions, target population characteristics, and reference posture related to the PARE console. In terms of GUI, the usability evaluation was conducted by three usability testing experts with a 7-point scale (1 : very low, 4 : neutral, 7 : very high) on GUI of the PARE operation console by seven usability criteria. The improved PARE operation console was designed to reflect the optimal values of design variables calculated from design formula, the results from usability testing, and the operator’s needs. The improvement effect was observed by 20 people who had experience with the PARE operation console. As a result of the validation, monitor visibility and cockpit visibility for the improved PUI design and visibility and efficiency for the improved GUI design were significantly increased by more than 90% respectively. The improved design of the PARE operation console in this study can contribute to enhance operation performance of the PARE.
참고문헌 (23)
- ANSI, "Human Factors Engineering of Computer Workstations" (2007), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Chaffin, D. B., "Occupational Biomechanics" (2006), Wiley
- Freivalds, A., "Niebel’s Methods, Standards, and Work Design" (2014), McGrawHill
- Jang, D. Y., "Approach of Methodology for a Improving Displays of Computerized Procedure System and Development of Procedure Writer’s Guidelines in the Nuclear Power Plant", Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers conference, pp.765~772 (2004)
- 김대성, "A Study on the VDT Workstations Usage for Office Workers", 대한인간공학회지, 34(2), pp.179~190 (2015), 대한인간공학회[DOI]
- 유희천, "Usability Evaluation of Graphic User Interfaces for a Military Computer-Based Training System", 대한인간공학회지, 34(5), pp.401~410 (2015), 대한인간공학회[DOI]
- Kwahk, J, "A Methodology for Evaluating the Usability of Audiovisual Consumer Electronic Products", pp.1999
- 이백희, "Digital Human Simulation을 활용한 방사성 폐기물 처리장 주제어실의 인체공학적 평가", 대한인간공학회지, 29(3), pp.383~391 (2010), 대한인간공학회
- 이백희, "Ergonomic Evaluation of Console Chairs for a Weapon Locating Radar", 대한인간공학회지, 33(2), pp.97~108 (2014), 대한인간공학회[DOI]
- Lee, S.S., "A Study of User Centered Rail-Cab Design", Proceedings of the Korean Society for Railway conference, pp.608~614 (2014)
- Letsu-Dake, E., "A Case Study of Experimental Evaluation of Adaptive Interfaces", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(1), pp.34~40 (2010)
- Likert, R., "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes", Archives of Psychology, 22(140), pp.5~55 (1932)
- Lin, R. T., "Effectiveness of Workstation Design on Reducing Musculoskeletal Risk Factors and Symptoms among Semiconductor Fabrication Room Workers", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, pp.35~42 (2007)
- Nielsen, J., "Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation", Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference, pp.373~380 (1992)
- Nielsen, J., "Usability Inspection Methods", Proceedings of the CHI conference, pp.413~414 (1994)
- 오승환, "사용성 평가 방법 비교에 관한 연구 : 시각장애인용 카메라 어플리케이션의 사례", 석사, Division of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering(Human Factors and Ergonomics Program), pp.2013
- Park, W. K., "A Factor Combination Approach to Developing Style Guides for Mobile Phone User Interface", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(5), pp.536~545 (2011)
- Salvendy, G., "Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics" (2012), Wiley
- Sanders, M.S., "Human Factors in Engineering and Design" (1994), McGrawHill
- Shim, J.H., "A Study on the Development of On Screen Display Interface Design for Digital Convergence TV User", Proceedings of the HCI Society of Korea conference, pp.1409~1413 (2006)
- "Korean Statistical Anthropometric Data" (2015)[URL]
- Stillwell, W. G., "A Comparison of Weight Approximation Techniques in Multiattribute Utility Decision Making", Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 28(1), pp.62~77 (1981)
- Wickens, C. D., "An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering" (2003), PrenticeHall