본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

재고비용할당을 위한 비례적 접근법

The Proportional Method for Inventory Cost Allocation

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

The cooperative game theory consists of a set of players and utility function that has positive values for a subset of players, called coalition, in the game. The purpose of cost allocation method is to allocate the relevant cost among game players in a fair and rational way. Therefore, cost allocation method based on cooperative game theory has been applied in many areas for fair and reasonable cost allocation. On the other hand, the desirable characteristics of the cost allocation method are Pareto optimality, rationality, and marginality. Pareto optimality means that costs are entirely paid by participating players. Rationality means that by joining the grand coalition, players do not pay more than they would if they chose to be part of any smaller coalition of players. Marginality means that players are charged at least enough to cover their marginal costs. If these characteristics are all met, the solution of cost allocation method exists in the core. In this study, proportional method is applied to EOQ inventory game and EPQ inventory game with shortage. Proportional method is a method that allocates costs proportionally to a certain allocator. This method has been applied to a variety of problems because of its convenience and simple calculations. However, depending on what the allocator is used for, the proportional method has a weakness that its solution may not exist in the core. Three allocators such as demand, marginal cost, and cost are considered. We prove that the solution of the proportional method to demand and the proportional method to marginal cost for EOQ game and EPQ game with shortage is in the core. The counterexample also shows that the solution of the proportional method to cost does not exist in the core.

Abstract

The cooperative game theory consists of a set of players and utility function that has positive values for a subset of players, called coalition, in the game. The purpose of cost allocation method is to allocate the relevant cost among game players in a fair and rational way. Therefore, cost allocation method based on cooperative game theory has been applied in many areas for fair and reasonable cost allocation. On the other hand, the desirable characteristics of the cost allocation method are Pareto optimality, rationality, and marginality. Pareto optimality means that costs are entirely paid by participating players. Rationality means that by joining the grand coalition, players do not pay more than they would if they chose to be part of any smaller coalition of players. Marginality means that players are charged at least enough to cover their marginal costs. If these characteristics are all met, the solution of cost allocation method exists in the core. In this study, proportional method is applied to EOQ inventory game and EPQ inventory game with shortage. Proportional method is a method that allocates costs proportionally to a certain allocator. This method has been applied to a variety of problems because of its convenience and simple calculations. However, depending on what the allocator is used for, the proportional method has a weakness that its solution may not exist in the core. Three allocators such as demand, marginal cost, and cost are considered. We prove that the solution of the proportional method to demand and the proportional method to marginal cost for EOQ game and EPQ game with shortage is in the core. The counterexample also shows that the solution of the proportional method to cost does not exist in the core.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Bernstein, F., "Cooperation in assembly systems : The role of knowledge sharing networks", European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), pp.160~171 (2015)
  2. Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G., "Cooperative game theory and inventory management", European Journal of Operational Research, 210(3), pp.459~466 (2011)
  3. Hartman, B.C., "Cores of Inventory Centralization Games", Games and Economic Behavior, 31(1), pp.26~49 (2000)
  4. Hartman, B.C., "Cost Allocation in Continuous-Review Inventory Models", Naval Research Logistics, 43(4), pp.549~561 (1996)
  5. 김두환, "거래비용을 고려한 기업 간 공유경제에서의 이익 배분 방안", 한국산업정보학회논문지, 20(4), pp.111~126 (2015), 한국산업정보학회
  6. 이동주, "재고비용할당을 위한 협조적 게임이론 기법", 대한설비관리학회지, 23(2), pp.35~44 (2018), 대한설비관리학회
  7. 이동주, "판매자와 구매자의 재고상한이 존재하는 VMI", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 40(4), pp.105~111 (2017), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  8. 이성재, "샤플리값을 이용한 한국읜 소득 및 자산 불평등의 원천별 기여도 분석", 한국경제의 분석, 23(1), pp.57~109 (2017), 한국경제의 분석패널[DOI]
  9. Meca, A., "Cooperation and competition in inventory games", Mathematical Methods Operations Research, 57(3), pp.481~493 (2003)
  10. Meca, A., "Inventory games", European Journal of Operational Research, 156(1), pp.127~139 (2004)
  11. Muller, A., "The Newsvendor Game Has a Nonempty Core", Games and Economic Behavior, 38(1), pp.118~126 (2002)
  12. Owen, G., "Game Theory" (1995), Academic Press
  13. 박선영, "Fair Revenue Sharing for Public Transportation System in Seoul Metropolitan Area", 재정학연구, 4(3), pp.135~162 (2011), 한국재정학회
  14. 신현준, "Collaborative Vendor Managed Inventory Models for Managing 2-Echelon Supply Chains with the Consideration of Shortage in Demand", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 9(2), pp.556~563 (2008), 한국산학기술학회
  15. Straffin, P. D., "Game Theory and Strategy" (1993), The Mathematical Association of America

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)