본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산업연관분석을 통한 초고온가스로 건설 파급효과 분석

VHTR Construction Ripple Effect Analysis Using Inter-Industry Tables

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

The VHTR (Very High Temperature gas-cooled nuclear Reactor) has been considered as a major heat source and the most safe generation IV type reactor for mass hydrogen production to prepare for the hydrogen economy era. The VHTR satisfies goals for the GIF (Generation IV International Forum) policy such as sustainablility, economics, reliability and proliferation resistance and physical protection, and safety. As a part of a VHTR economic analysis, we have studied the VHTR construction cost and operation and maintenance cost. However, it is somewhat difficult to expect the ripple effect on the whole industry due to the lack of information about Inter-industries relationship. In many case, the ripple effect are based on experts’ knowledge or uncertain qualitative assumptions. As a result, we propose quantitative analysis techniques for ripple effects such as the production inducement effect, added value inducement effect, and employment inducement effect for VHTR 600MWt×4 modules construction and operation ripple effect based on NOAK (Nth Of A Kind). Because inducement effect values have been published annually, we predict inducement effect’s relation function and estimated values including production inducement effect value, added value inducement effect value, and employment inducement effect value using time series and estimated values are verified with published inducement effects’ value. This paper presents a new method for the ripple effect and preliminary ripple effect consequence using a time series analysis and inter-industry table. This ripple effect analysis techniques can be applied to effect expectation analysis as well as other type reactor’s ripple effect analysis including VHTR for process heat.

Abstract

The VHTR (Very High Temperature gas-cooled nuclear Reactor) has been considered as a major heat source and the most safe generation IV type reactor for mass hydrogen production to prepare for the hydrogen economy era. The VHTR satisfies goals for the GIF (Generation IV International Forum) policy such as sustainablility, economics, reliability and proliferation resistance and physical protection, and safety. As a part of a VHTR economic analysis, we have studied the VHTR construction cost and operation and maintenance cost. However, it is somewhat difficult to expect the ripple effect on the whole industry due to the lack of information about Inter-industries relationship. In many case, the ripple effect are based on experts’ knowledge or uncertain qualitative assumptions. As a result, we propose quantitative analysis techniques for ripple effects such as the production inducement effect, added value inducement effect, and employment inducement effect for VHTR 600MWt×4 modules construction and operation ripple effect based on NOAK (Nth Of A Kind). Because inducement effect values have been published annually, we predict inducement effect’s relation function and estimated values including production inducement effect value, added value inducement effect value, and employment inducement effect value using time series and estimated values are verified with published inducement effects’ value. This paper presents a new method for the ripple effect and preliminary ripple effect consequence using a time series analysis and inter-industry table. This ripple effect analysis techniques can be applied to effect expectation analysis as well as other type reactor’s ripple effect analysis including VHTR for process heat.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 바트볼트, "몽골에서의 석탄액화플랜트 건설에 대한 경제성평가", 산업경영시스템학회지, 35(1), pp.32~38 (2012), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  2. Market Prediction Methodology for Preliminary Feasibility Survey Profit Estimation in R&D, "Choi, E. J.", KISTEP, ~, pp.2014-035 (2014)
  3. 정성환, "품질보증 이슈 조기감지 시스템의 경제성 평가", 품질경영학회지, 40(1), pp.39~48 (2012), 한국품질경영학회
  4. Korea Energy Economic Institute, "2013 Yearbook of Energy Statistics", ~ (2014)
  5. 이태훈, "대용변수를 이용한 X 관리도의 경제적 설계", 품질경영학회지, 37(2), pp.46~57 (2009), 한국품질경영학회
  6. The Study of Economic Analysis and Demonstration Research Plan for VHTR Business, "Lee", Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, ~, pp.KAERI (2014), TR-5435[DOI]
  7. 이태훈, "원자력수소 연구개발과제의 품질보증 적용 사례 연구", 산업경영시스템학회지, 33(4), pp.114~121 (2010), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  8. 송상화, "종합해양과학기지 구축 및 활용의 경제성 분석", 산업경영시스템학회지, 38(1), pp.52~64 (2015), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  9. The 2005’s Inter-Industry table, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2008)
  10. The 2006’s Inter-Industry table, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2009)
  11. The 2007’s Inter-Industry table, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2010)
  12. The 2008’s Inter-Industry table, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2011)
  13. The 2009’s Inter-Industry table, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2012)
  14. The 2010’s Inter-Industry table, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2013)
  15. The 2011 and 2012’s Inter-Industry table, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2014)
  16. The Inter-Industry analysis explanations, "The Bank of Korea", ~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)