교수학습지원센터의 BSC 모형 개발
Development of BSC Model of Center for Teaching and Learning
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, BSC model of center for teaching and learning was developed using balanced scorecard suitable for non-profit organization. Firstly, relevant literature surveys and evaluation indicators of various CTL and institution with similar characteristics were examined. Next, a draft BSC model was designed through interviews of specialists. Lastly, the BSC model was proposed by verifying the content validity of the evaluation model by conducting two Delphi surveys. The BSC model of CTL has 4 perspectives: resource, customer, internal process, learning and growth, 9 critical success factors: 2 factors in resource, customer and learning and growth perspectives, 3 factors in internal process perspective, and 23 key performance Indicators: 4 indicators in resource and learning and growth, 7 indicators in customer perspective, 8 indicators in internal process perspective. The implications of this study through the results were as follows: firstly, the proposed BSC model showed an evaluation model suitable for a non-profit organization. Second, the BSC model was linked to the organization’s mission and vision. Third, it could contribute to the long-term development of CTL. Lastly, if it could be applied to management, and evaluated, it is expected to play a role of providing basic data for the budget support and spread of the university.
Abstract
In this study, BSC model of center for teaching and learning was developed using balanced scorecard suitable for non-profit organization. Firstly, relevant literature surveys and evaluation indicators of various CTL and institution with similar characteristics were examined. Next, a draft BSC model was designed through interviews of specialists. Lastly, the BSC model was proposed by verifying the content validity of the evaluation model by conducting two Delphi surveys. The BSC model of CTL has 4 perspectives: resource, customer, internal process, learning and growth, 9 critical success factors: 2 factors in resource, customer and learning and growth perspectives, 3 factors in internal process perspective, and 23 key performance Indicators: 4 indicators in resource and learning and growth, 7 indicators in customer perspective, 8 indicators in internal process perspective. The implications of this study through the results were as follows: firstly, the proposed BSC model showed an evaluation model suitable for a non-profit organization. Second, the BSC model was linked to the organization’s mission and vision. Third, it could contribute to the long-term development of CTL. Lastly, if it could be applied to management, and evaluated, it is expected to play a role of providing basic data for the budget support and spread of the university.
참고문헌 (18)
- 차가영, "BSC와 AHP를 활용한 정부출연연구기관의 경영성과지표 개발 사례연구", 대한경영학회지, 29(7), pp.1083~1107 (2016), 대한경영학회[DOI]
- Grant, J. S., "Focus on quantitative methods : Selection and use of content experts for instrument development", Research in Nursing and Health, 20, pp.269~274 (1997)
- 허균, "교수학습센터 성과 평가 모형 개발 연구", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 11(6), pp.77~84 (2008), 한국컴퓨터교육학회[DOI]
- Hyun, Y. S., "Prediction of New Changes in the Accountabilities of Life-Long Educational Institutions for Learner, Society and Institutional Management by Analysis of Delphi Surveyed by the Workers of the Life-Long Educational Institutions", The Korean Society of Human Resource Development, 9(1), pp.1~26 (2007)
- Kaplan, R. S., "Translating strategy into action : The balanced scorecard" (1996), Harvard Business School Press
- 김경희, "대학평생교육원의 BSC 성과평가모형 개발", 평생학습사회, 10(2), pp.155~180 (2014), 미래원격교육연구원
- 김희배, "효과적인 대학 교수-학습지원체제 수립을 위한 요구분석과 운영전략", 교육정보미디어연구, 10(4), pp.195~226 (2004), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- Kim, K. C., "An analysis on the Current Condition and Content of the Early Childhood Education part in the City and Province Unit Teaching and Learning Service Center", The Korea Society for Children’s Media, 4, pp.85~105 (2005)
- Lawshe, C. H., "A quantitative approach to content validity", Personnel Psychology, 28, pp.563~575 (1975)
- Lee, J. G., "The teaching development approach strategy of unit university level", Higher Education, 140, pp.73~84 (2006)
- 이삼주, "BSC관점에서의 공공부문 성과측정: PBLIS를 사례로", 지방행정연구, 19(2), pp.155~186 (2005), (재) 한국지방행정연구원
- 노경호, "교수학습지원센터의 도입 및 운영방안에 관한 연구", 경영과 정보연구, (22), pp.25~59 (2007), 대한경영정보학회[DOI]
- 박은숙, "대학 교수학습지원센터 교수역량 강화 프로그램 성과평가 모형 개발", 인문사회 21, 10(2), pp.647~658 (2019), 인문사회 21[DOI]
- Park, M. S., "A Study on Application of BSC of the Non-Profit Organization", The Korean Regional Development Association, 8(1), pp.127~150 (2008)
- 박선향, "대학 교수학습센터 운영 사업의 통합적 성과평가방법에 관한 소고", 교육방법연구, 31(1), pp.1~20 (2019), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
- 송해덕, "BSC관점에서 과학기술계 정부출연연구교육기관 성과측정 평가체계 개발", 평생교육 · HRD연구, 6(2), pp.1~20 (2010), 한국평생교육ㆍHRD연구소
- Yoo, D. G., "Development of Evaluation Indicators on CTLE(Center for Teaching and Learning of Excellence)", Journal of College Education, 15(3-4), pp.173~185 (2014)
- 윤상오, "정보화수준평가에서 BSC기법의 적용가능성 탐색", 한국행정연구, 12(2), pp.36~68 (2003), 한국행정연구원