Assessing the Dimensionality and Reliability of Three-Component Model
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Commitment is an important multifaceted construct but also one that is hard to define. In line with this, previous research has suggested various conceptualizations for commitment scale. Among those, this study examines the applicability of Allen and Meyer’s (1990) original three-component model since the applicability has been debatable depending on the context. This study is to provide a critical view to employ Allen and Meyer’s three-component model as there are several versions whose items are different to some extent. This study focused on the dimensionality of continuance commitment scale and the reliability of normative commitment scale to measure Korean workers’ commitment. This study examines Korean workers’ commitment using data from two transport-related companies in the small-and medium-sized category (N=358). The analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 and LISREL 8.51. The results show that the reliability of normative commitment scale was not acceptable and uni-dimensional continuance commitment scale was supported in a Korean context. This suggests the researchers’ care should be taken to use normative and continuance commitment according to the TCM version.
Abstract
Commitment is an important multifaceted construct but also one that is hard to define. In line with this, previous research has suggested various conceptualizations for commitment scale. Among those, this study examines the applicability of Allen and Meyer’s (1990) original three-component model since the applicability has been debatable depending on the context. This study is to provide a critical view to employ Allen and Meyer’s three-component model as there are several versions whose items are different to some extent. This study focused on the dimensionality of continuance commitment scale and the reliability of normative commitment scale to measure Korean workers’ commitment. This study examines Korean workers’ commitment using data from two transport-related companies in the small-and medium-sized category (N=358). The analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 and LISREL 8.51. The results show that the reliability of normative commitment scale was not acceptable and uni-dimensional continuance commitment scale was supported in a Korean context. This suggests the researchers’ care should be taken to use normative and continuance commitment according to the TCM version.
참고문헌 (32)
- 고종욱, "조직몰입에 대한 삼차원적 개념화의 타당성 재검토", 한국정책연구, 12(2), pp.23~39 (2012), 경인행정학회[DOI]
- 김원형, "조직몰입 세 성분 모형의 개념화", 산업 및 조직, 36(1), pp.51~74 (1995)
- Allen, N. J., "The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization", Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, pp.1~18 (1990)
- Allen, N. J., "Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization : An examination of construct validity", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), pp.252~276 (1996)
- Angle, L., "An empirical-assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness", Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), pp.1~14 (1981)
- Benkhoff, B., "Disentangling organizational commitment : The dangers of the OCQ for research and policy", Personnel Review, 26, pp.114~131 (1997)
- Bergman, M. E., "The relationship between affective and normative commitment : review and research agenda", Journal of Organisational Behavior, 27, pp.645~663 (2006)
- Bozeman, D. P., "The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment-turnover cognitions relationships", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), pp.161~173 (2001)
- Cohen, A., "Multiple commitments in the workplace : An integrative approach" (2003), Erlbaum
- Cook, J., "New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment", Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, pp.39~52 (1980)
- Culpepper, R. A., "A test of revised scales for the Meyer and Allen(1991)Three-Component commitment construct", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(4), pp.604~616 (2000)
- Ferris, K. R., "A comparison of two organizational commitment scales", Personnel Psychology, 36, pp.87~99 (1983)
- Field, A., "Discovering Statistics Using SPSS" (2009), Sage
- Gill, H., "Affective and continuance commitment and their relations with deviant workplace behaviors in Korea", Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, pp.595~607 (2011)
- Ko, J. W., "Assessment of Meyer and Allen’s Three-Component Model of organisational commitment in South Korea", Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), pp.961~973 (1997)
- Lee, K., "The Three-Component Model of organisational commitment: An application to South Korea", Applied Psychology : An International Review, 50(4), pp.596~614 (2001)
- Lissitz, R. W., "Effect of the number of scale points on reliability : A Monte Carlo approach", Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), pp.10~13 (1975)
- McGee, G. W., "Two(or more?)dimensions of organisational commitment : Reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales", Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, pp.638~642 (1987)
- Meyer, J. P., "Commitment to organizations and occupations : Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), pp.538~551 (1993)
- Revised measures of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to organizations, "Meyer, J. P.", University of Western Ontario, ~ (1996)
- Meyer, J. P., "Normative commitment in the workplace : A theoretical analysis and re-conceptualization", Human Resource Management Review, 20, pp.283~294 (2010)
- Meyer, J. P., "Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization : A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, pp.20~52 (2002)
- Meyer, J. P., "Employee commitment in context : The nature and implication of commitment profiles", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, pp.1~16 (2012)
- Morrow, P. C., "On assessing measures of work commitment", Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 7, pp.139~146 (1986)
- Mowday, R. T., "The Measurement of Organizational Commitment", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, pp.224~247 (1979)
- Neininger, A., "Effects of team and organizational commitment – A longitudinal study", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, pp.567~579 (2010)
- Porter, L. W., "Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians", Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, pp.603~609 (1974)
- Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioural research : A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879~903 (2003)
- Reichers, A. E., "A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment", Academy of Management Review, 10, pp.465~476 (1985)
- Rossiter, J. R., "The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), pp.305~335 (2002)
- Sharma, S., "A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models", Journal of Business Research, 58, pp.935~943 (2005)
- Yousef, D. A., "Validating the dimensionality of Porter et al. ’s measurement of organizational commitment in a non-Western culture setting", The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, pp.1067~1079 (2003)