단일 수복물과 3본 고정성 수복물 지대치 모델에서 삼차원 분석을 통한 구강 스캐너의 정확도 비교
Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanner by three-dimensional analysis in single and 3-unit bridge abutment model: In vitro study
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
목적: 이 연구의 목적은 단일 수복물 지대치와 3본 고정성 수복물 지대치 모델에서 3종류의 구강 스캐너에 따른 정확도를 평가하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 본 연구에서는 단일 수복물 지대치와 제1대구치가 상실된 3본 고정성 수복물 지대치를 제작하고, 이를 주모형으로 설정하였다. 제작된 주 모형은 산업용 삼차원 스캐너로 스캔하였고, 이를 참조 스캔 데이터로 설정하였다. 3종류의 구강 스캐너(CS3600, CS3500, 그리고 EZIS PO)를 이용하여 주 모형을 5회 스캔 하였다. 이를 평가 스캔 데이터로 설정하였다. 삼차원 비교분석(Geomagic control X)에서 지대치의 스캔 정확도를 평가하기 위해 분할된 지대치를 선택하여 분석하였다. 통계분석은 SPSS 소프트웨어를 이용하여 분석하였다 (α = .05). 구강 스캐너 정확도는 kruskal-wallis test를 실시하여 비교하였고, pairwise test로 사후 검정을 실시하였다. 단일 수복물 지대치 모델과 3본 고정성 수복물 지대치 모델의 정확도 차이는 mannwhitney U test로 분석하였다. 결과: 구강 스캐너에 따른 정확도의 측정결과는 모두 유의한 차이를 보였다 (P < .05). 그리고 단일 수복물 지대치 모델과 3본 고정성 수복물 지대치 모델의 진도(trueness)는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보여주었으며, 단일 수복물 지대치에서 더 좋은 진도를 나타냈다 (P < .05). 정밀도(precision)에서는 유의미한 차이가 없었다 (P = .616). 결론: 단일 수복물과 3본 고정성 수복물 지대치의 정확도를 비교한 결과, 스캔 영역이 늘어날수록 지대치 스캔의 오류는 증가하였고, 3종류의 구강 스캐너에서 3본 고정성 수복물 지대치 모델의 스캔 정확도는 임상적으로 허용 가능하다.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three types of intraoral scanners and the accuracy of the single abutment and bridge abutment model. Materials and methods: In this study, a single abutment, and a bridge abutment with missing first molar was fabricated and set as the reference model. The reference model was scanned with an industrial three-dimensional scanner and set as reference scan data. The reference model was scanned five times using the three intraoral scanners (CS3600, CS3500, and EZIS PO). This was set as the evaluation scan data. In the three-dimensional analysis (Geomagic control X), the divided abutment region was selected and analyzed to verify the scan accuracy of the abutment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (α = .05). The accuracy of intraoral scanners was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post-test was performed using the Pairwise test. The accuracy difference between the single abutment model and the bridge abutment model was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The accuracy according to the intraoral scanner was significantly different (P < .05). The trueness of the single abutment model and the bridge abutment model showed a statistically significant difference and showed better trueness in the single abutment (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the precision (P = .616). Conclusion: As a result of comparing the accuracy of single and bridge abutments, the error of abutment scan increased with increasing scan area, and the accuracy of bridge abutment model was clinically acceptable in three types of intraoral scanners.
참고문헌 (35)
- Ng J, "A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.555~560 (2014)
- Wesemann C, "Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing : A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing", Quintessence Int, 48, pp.41~50 (2017)
- 강병길, "구강스캐너를 이용하여 제작된 CT 가이드 임플란트 수술용 형판의 무치악 거리에 따른 정확도 분석", 대한치과보철학회지, 55(1), pp.1~8 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Sedda M, "Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids", J Contemp Dent Pract, 9, pp.59~66 (2008)
- Chandran DT, "Two-and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials : effects of storage time and moisture contamination", Biomed Mater Eng, 20, pp.243~249 (2010)
- Mah J, "Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging", Orthod Craniofac Res, 6, pp.10~16 (2003)
- White AJ, "Analysis of intraarch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2impression materials and a modeling process based on conebeam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.456.e1~456.e9 (2010)
- 권혁진, "3차원 광학 스캐너와 콘빔CT에서 생성된 디지털 모형의 비교", 구강회복응용과학지, 32(1), pp.60~69 (2016), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
- Persson A, "A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touchprobe scanner", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.194~200 (2006)
- van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)
- 박주희, "치과용 스캐너 평가를 위한 국제표준모델의 재료 및 표면 상태에 따른스캔 영상 결과물 비교 연구", 구강회복응용과학지, 34(2), pp.104~115 (2018), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
- Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)
- "ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions" (1994)[URL]
- Lee JJ, "Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.253~259 (2017)
- Bohner LOL, "Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.617~623 (2017)
- Vecsei B, "Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD", CAM systems-An in vitro study, 2017, pp.61, 177~184
- Patzelt SB, "Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.1687~1694 (2014)
- Ender A, "In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions", Quintessence Int, 46, pp.9~17 (2015)
- Ender A, "Full arch scans : conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study", Int J Comput Dent, 14, pp.11~21 (2011)
- Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions : a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
- Jeong ID, "Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner : An in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.755~759 (2016)
- Flügge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.471~478 (2013)
- 김경록, "디지털 인상법과 전통적 인상법의 정확도 비교: 체계적 고찰", 대한치과보철학회지, 56(3), pp.258~268 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Ender A, "In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.313~320 (2016)
- Grünheid T, "Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner : an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.673~682 (2014)
- Aragón ML, "Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements : a systematic review", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.429~434 (2016)
- 최종훈, "현재 존재하는 구강 스캐너에 대한 고찰", 구강회복응용과학지, 31(2), pp.112~125 (2015), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
- Kim J, "Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.221~230 (2016)
- Son K, "Prediction of the learning curves of 2 dental CAD software programs", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.95~100 (2019)
- Kim RJ, "Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition : A qualitative and quantitative evaluation", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.895~903 (2018)
- Imburgia M, "Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology : a comparative in vitro study", BMC Oral Health, 17, pp.1~13 (2017)
- Fukazawa S, "Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.450~459 (2017)
- Nedelcu RG, "Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners : an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1461~1471 (2014)
- Su TS, "Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner : An in-vitro study", J Prosthodont Res, 59, pp.236~242 (2015)
- Lim JH, "Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.225~232 (2018)