산부식 전처리에 따른 2단계 자가부식 접착제의 연마 법랑질에 대한 미세인장결합강도
The micro-tensile bond strength of two-step self-etch adhesive to ground enamel with and without prior acid-etching
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
자가부식 접착제는 사용하기 쉽고, 술식 민감성이 적은 장점이 있으나 특히 산도가 약한 자가부식 접착제의 법랑질에 대한 결합력은 논란 이 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 2단계 자가부식 접착제인 Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan)의 연마 법랑질에 대한 미세인장 결합강도를 측정하여 3단계 산부식수세 접착제인 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) 및 1단계 자가부식 접착제인 iBond (Heraeus Kulzer Gmbh, Hanau, Germany)의 결합강도와 비교하고자 하였고, 2단계 자가부식 접착제에 산부식 전처 리를 시행하는 것이 법랑질에 대한 결합강도를 높일 수 있는지 알아 보고자 하였다. 실험군은 2단계 자가부식 접착제인 Clearfil SE Bond만 사용한 비산부식 군과 35% 인산 (Scotchbond Etchant, 3M ESPE)으로 산 부식 후 Clearfil SE Bond를 사용한 산부식 군, 그리고 1단계 자가부식 접착제인 iBond를 사용한 군으로 나누었다. 대조군은 3단계 산부식수세 접착제인 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose를 사용한 군으로 정하였다. Bovine 전치의 순면을 십자가형으로 4등분하여 각 군으로 무작위로 배분하였다. 각 치아의 순면을 800-grit 실리콘 카바이드 지로 연마한 후 삭제된 법랑질면에 제조사의 설명서에 따라 각 군의 접착제를 적용하고 Light-Core (Bisco)로 적층 충전하였다. 시편은 37¡E′, 증류수에 일주일 동안 보관한 후 low speed precicion diamond saw (TOPMENT Metsaw-LS, R&B, Daejeon, Korea)를 이용하여 약 0.8× 0.8mm 단면이 되도록 시편을 절단하여 미세시편을 제작하였다. 일주일마다 증류수를 교환하면서 한 달, 세 달 동안 37¡E′, 증류수에 미세시 편을 보관한 후 각각의 미세인장결합강도를 측정하였다. 미세인장결합강도 (MPa)는 파절 시에 가해진 힘 (N)을 접착면적 (mm2)으로 나누어 계산하였다. 접착계면에서의 파절 양상은 실물현미경 (Microscope-B nocular, Nikon)을 이용하여 분류하였다. 미세인장결합강도에 대한 통계분석은 one-way ANOVA를 이용하여 유의수준 5%에서 검정하였고, 사후감정은 Least Significant Difference 방법을 이용하였다. 중합 후 1개월 뒤 측정된 각각의 접착제의 평균 미세인장결합강도는 유의수준 5%에서 모든 접착제 간에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 3개월 뒤 측정된 각각의 접착제의 평균 미세인장결합강도는 유의수준 5%에서 iBond 와 Clearfil SE Bond 비산부식 군과 Scotchbond Multi- Purpose 간에는 각각 유의한 차이가 없었다. 본 연구에서는 2단계 자가부식 접착제인 Clearfil SE Bond의 연마 법랑질에 대한 미세인장결합강도가 3단계 산부식수세 접착제인 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose 와 비교하여 유의한 차이가 없었으며 (P>0.05), 3개월 후의 결과에서 Clearfil SE Bond 비산부식 군의 미 세인장결합강도가 Clearfil SE Bond 산부식 군보다 유의하게 낮았다 (P<0.05). 즉 35% 인산으로 산부식 전처리를 시행한결과 Clearfil SE Bond 의 법랑질에 대한 결합강도가 증가하였다.
Abstract
Statement of problems: Self-etch adhesives exhibit some clinical benefits such as ease of manipulation and reduced technique-sensitivity. Nevertheless, some concern remains regarding the bonding effectiveness of self-etch adhesives to enamel, in particular when so-called ‘mild’self-etch adhesives are employed. This study compared the microtensile bond strengths to ground enamel of the two-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) to the three-step etchand- rinse adhesive Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M ESPE) and the one-step self-etch adhesive iBond (Heraeus Kulzer). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a preceding phosphoric acid conditioning step on the bonding effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive to ground enamel. Material and methods: The two-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond non-etch group, Clearfil SE Bond etch group with prior 35% phosphoric acid etching, and the one-step self-etch adhesive iBond group were used as experimental groups. The three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond Multi-Purpose was used as a control group. The facial surfaces of bovine incisors were divided in four equal parts cruciformly, and randomly distributed into each group. The facial surface of each incisor was ground with 800-grit silicon carbide paper. Each adhesive group was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions to ground enamel, after which the surface was built up using Light-Core (Bisco). After storage in distilled water at 37℃ for 1 week, the restored teeth were sectioned into enamel beams approximately 0.8*0.8mm in cross section using a low speed precision diamond saw (TOPMET Metsaw-LS). After storage in distilled water at 37℃ for 1 month, 3 months, microtensile bond strength evaluations were performed using microspecimens. The microtensile bond strength (MPa) was derived by dividing the imposed force (N) at time of fracture by the bond area (mm2). The mode of failure at the interface was determined with a microscope (Microscope-B nocular, Nikon). The data of microtensile bond strength were statistically analyzed using a one-way ANOVA, followed by Least Significant Difference Post Hoc Test at a significance level of 5%. Results: The mean microtensile bond strength after 1 month of storage showed no statistically significant difference between all adhesive groups (P>0.05). After 3 months of storage, adhesion to ground enamel of iBond was not significantly different from Clearfil SE Bond etch (P>0.05), while Clearfil SE Bond non-etch and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose demonstrated significantly lower bond strengths (P<0.05), with no significant differences between the two adhesives. Conclusion: In this study the microtensile bond strength to ground enamel of two-step selfetch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond was not significantly different from three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and prior etching with 35% phosphoric acid significantly increased the bonding effectiveness of Clearfil SE Bond to enamel at 3 months.
참고문헌 (22)
- Van Meerbeek B, "Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry", Oper Dent, 26, pp.119~144 (2001)
- Van Meerbeek B, "Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges", Oper Dent, 28, pp.215~235 (2003)
- De Munck J, "A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue : methods and results", J Dent Res, 84, pp.118~132 (2005)
- Frankenberger R, "Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives : effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations", Dent Mater, 21, pp.397~412 (2005)
- Park YJ, "Current adhesive dentistry for dental restoratives", J Korean Dental Association, 41, pp.478~491 (2003)
- Leem SH, "Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to enamel", J Korean Dental Association, 42, pp.790~797 (2004)
- Peumans M, "Clinical effectiveness of comtemporary adhesives : A systematic review of current clinical trials", Dent Mater, 21, pp.864~881 (2005)
- Yoshida Y, "Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers", J Dent Res, 83, pp.454~458 (2004)
- Miguez PA, "Effect of acid-etching on the enamel bond of two self-etching systems", J Adhes Dent, 5, pp.107~112 (2003)
- Armstrong SR, "Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage", J Adhes Dent, 5, pp.47~56 (2003)
- Perdigao J, "Bonding characteristics of selfetching adhesives to intact vs. prepared enamel", J Esthet Restor Dent, 15, pp.32~42 (2003)
- Inoue S, "Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin", J Adhes Dent, 3, pp.237~245 (2001)
- Van Landuyt KL, "Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching", J Dent, 34, pp.77~85 (2006)
- Van Meerbeek B, "A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel", Dent Mater, 21, pp.375~383 (2005)
- Nakamichi I, "Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test", J Dent Res, 62, pp.1076~1081 (1983)
- Miyazaki M, "Influence of self-etching primer drying time on enamel bond strength of resin composites", J Dent, 27, pp.203~207 (1999)
- Reeves GW, "Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth", Oper Dent, 20, pp.230~235 (1995)
- Reis AF, "Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth", J Adhes Dent, 6, pp.117~121 (2004)
- Brackett WW, "The microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel", Oper Dent, 31, pp.332~337 (2006)
- Torii Y, "Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin", Am J Dent, 15, pp.305~308 (2002)
- Turkun SL, "Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a onebottle adhesive system at two-years", J Dent, 31, pp.527~534 (2003)
- Peumans M, "Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions", Eur J Oral Sci, 113, pp.512~518 (2005)