A comparison of the fidelity between various cores fabricated with CAD/CAM systems
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Recently, various all-ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM systems have come into wide use in dental clinic. However, there are only few domestic studies on CAD/CAM restorations. PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to compare the fidelity (absolute marginal discrepancy and internal gap) between various cores fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems (Procera system, Lava system, Cerec inLab system) and conventional metal cast core. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 cores per each system were fabricated. The absolute marginal discrepancies were measured using measuring microscope and digital counter. The internal gaps were calculated using a silicone paste. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s HSD test. RESULTS: Within the limits of this study the results were as follows. 1. The absolute marginal discrepancies were 32.5±3.7 ㎛ for metal cast core, 72.2±7.0 ㎛ for Procera core, 40.8±5.4 ㎛ for Lava core, and 55.3±8.7 ㎛ for Cerec inLab core. The internal gaps were 38.4± 5.7 ㎛ for metal cast core, 71.4±5.3 ㎛ for Procera core, 45.9±7.3 ㎛ for Lava core, and 51.8±6.2 ㎛ for Cerec inLab core. 2. The fidelity of metal cast core showed the smallest gaps, followed by Lava core, Cerec inLab core, and Procera core. CONCLUSION: The fidelities of 4 core groups were all within the clinically acceptable range (120 ㎛).
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Recently, various all-ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM systems have come into wide use in dental clinic. However, there are only few domestic studies on CAD/CAM restorations. PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to compare the fidelity (absolute marginal discrepancy and internal gap) between various cores fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems (Procera system, Lava system, Cerec inLab system) and conventional metal cast core. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 cores per each system were fabricated. The absolute marginal discrepancies were measured using measuring microscope and digital counter. The internal gaps were calculated using a silicone paste. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s HSD test. RESULTS: Within the limits of this study the results were as follows. 1. The absolute marginal discrepancies were 32.5±3.7 ㎛ for metal cast core, 72.2±7.0 ㎛ for Procera core, 40.8±5.4 ㎛ for Lava core, and 55.3±8.7 ㎛ for Cerec inLab core. The internal gaps were 38.4± 5.7 ㎛ for metal cast core, 71.4±5.3 ㎛ for Procera core, 45.9±7.3 ㎛ for Lava core, and 51.8±6.2 ㎛ for Cerec inLab core. 2. The fidelity of metal cast core showed the smallest gaps, followed by Lava core, Cerec inLab core, and Procera core. CONCLUSION: The fidelities of 4 core groups were all within the clinically acceptable range (120 ㎛).
참고문헌 (28)
- Land CH, "A new system of restoring badly decayed teeth by means of an enamelled metallic coating", Independent Practitioner, 7, pp.407~ (1886)
- Nakamura T, "Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD", CAM all-ceramic crowns, 2003, pp.16, 244~248
- Albert FE, "Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera Allceram crowns with four cements", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.529~535 (2004)
- Reich S, "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
- Sorensen SE, "Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins", Scand J Dent Res, 94, pp.109~114 (1986)
- Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)
- Lang NP, "Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins", J Clin Periodontol, 10, pp.563~578 (1983)
- May KB, "Precision of fit : the Procera Allceram crown", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.394~404 (1998)
- Sorensen JA, "A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.18~24 (1990)
- Holmes JR, "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)
- Yeo IS, "In vitro marginal fit of three allceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.459~464 (2003)
- Hung SH, "Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.26~31 (1990)
- McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
- Valderrama S, "A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.29~37 (1995)
- Morris HF, "Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Project NO. 242. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the marginal fit of cast ceramic, porcelain-shoulder, and cast metal full crown margins. Participants of CSP No. 147", 242, 1992, pp.67, 198~204
- Leong D, "Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 7, pp.440~447 (1994)
- Boening KW, "Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.419~424 (2000)
- Karlsson S, "The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study", Acta Odontol Scand, 51, pp.129~134 (1993)
- Denissen H, "Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain- veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.506~513 (2000)
- Quintas AF, "Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents : an in vitro evaluation", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.250~257 (2004)
- Hertlein G, "Marginal fit of CAD", CAM manufactured all ceramic zirconia prostheses, 2001, pp.80, 42~
- Bindl A, "Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic\ CAD", CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations, 2005, pp.32, 441~447
- Lin MT, "The effect of tooth preparation form on the fit of Procera copings", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.580~590 (1998)
- Beschnidt SM, "Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth", J Oral Rehabil, 26, pp.582~593 (1999)
- Sulaiman F, "A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 10, pp.478~484 (1997)
- Groten M, "Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.40~49 (2000)
- Jorgensen KD, "Structure of the film of zinc phosphate cement", Acta Odontol Scand, 18, pp.491~501 (1960)
- Akbar JH, "Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD", CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs, 2006, pp.15, 155~163