구리 합금 초음파 스케일러 팁이 치과 임플란트 및 수복 재료 표면에 미치는 영향
The effect of copper alloy scaler tip on the surface roughness of dental implant and restorative materials
3
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 구리 합금 스케일러 팁을 비롯한 수종의 스케일러 팁이 임플란트와 수복물 재료 표면에 실제 치석제거 시와 같이 적용하였을 때 표면 거칠기에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 도재, 티타늄, 지르코니아, 제3형 금합금의 지름 15 mm, 높이 1.5 mm의 원반형 시편을 준비하였고, 거칠기 형성기구로 스테인리스 스틸팁(SS), 플라스틱 수동 큐렛(PS), 구리 합금 팁(IS)을 이용하였으며, 시편의 개수는 각 재료 당 기구 별로 4개씩 총 64개를 사용하였다. 표면 거칠기는 40 g의 힘으로 초음파 스케일러는 시편의 표면과 팁이 15도, 핸드 큐렛은 시편의 표면과 큐렛의 날이 45도가 되도록 하여 1초에 1회 5 mm 수평 왕복 운동을 30초 동안 시행하여 형성하였다. 각 시편을 주사전자 현미경을 이용하여 관찰하였고, 원자현미경과 표면조도 거칠기 단 차 측정기를 이용하여 표면 거칠기(Ra, ㎛)를 측정하고 분석하였다. 결과: 주사전자 현미경으로 관찰 결과 표면 거칠기의 증가는 스테인리스 스틸 팁(Group SS)에서 가장 컸으며 구리 합금 팁(Group IS)에서 가장 적게 나타났다. 원자현미경으로 표면 거칠기를 측정한 결과, 스테인리스 스틸 팁(Group SS)은 도재 군과 제3형 금합금 군에서 대조군과 플라스틱 수동 큐렛(Group PS), 구리 합금 팁(Group IS)보다 표면 거칠기가 유의성 있게 크게 나타났고, 구리 합금 팁(Group IS)은 금합금 군에서는 스테인리스 스틸 팁(Group SS)과 플라스틱 수동 큐렛(Group PS)에 비해 표면 거칠기가 유의성 있게 적게 나타났다. 표면조도 거칠기 단 차 측정기로 측정 결과, 스테인리스 스틸 팁(Group SS)은 모든 군에서 대조군 및 플라스틱 수동 큐렛(Group PS)과 구리 합금 팁(Group IS)보다 표면 거칠기가 유의성 있게 크게 나타났으며, 구리 합금 팁(Group IS)은 모든 군에서 스테인리스 스틸 팁(Group SS)에 비해 표면 거칠기가 유의성 있게 적게 나타났다. 제3형 금합금은 도재, 티타늄, 지르코니아 군에 비해 치석제거 기구에 의한 표면 거칠기의 증가가 크게 나타났다(P<.05). 결론: 이상의 연구결과 새로이 개발된 구리 합금 팁(IS)을 적용하였을 때 티타늄 및 치과 수복 재료의 표면 거칠기에 영향을 주지 않음으로써, 임플란트 및 수복치료 된 치아의 치석제거 시 전통적인 스테인리스 스틸 팁(SS)의 대용품으로 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.
Abstract
This study is designed to investigate the various impacts of different types of scaler tips such as cooper alloy base tip and the others on the surface roughness of teeth and implant by the method which is currently in clinical use. Materials and methods: Four different types of disc shaped porcelain, titanium, zirconia, and Type III gold alloy dental materials sized 15 mm diameter, 1.5 mm thickness were used for the experiment. Plastic hand curette (Group PS), cooper alloy new tip (Group IS), and stainless steel tip (Group SS) were used as testing appliances. A total of 64 specimens were used for this study; Four specimens for each material and appliance group. Surface roughness was formed with 15 degree angle in ultrasonic scaler tip and with 45 degree angle in hand curette of instrument tip and the specimen surface with 5 mm long, one horizontal-reciprocating motion per second for 30 seconds by 40 g force. To survey the surface roughness of each specimen, a field emission scanning electron microscope, an atomic force microscope, and a surface profiler were used. (Ra, ㎛). Results: According to SEM, most increased surface roughness was observed in SS group while IS groups had minimal roughness change. Measurement by atomic force microscope presented that the surface roughness of SS group was significantly greater than those of PS, IS and control groups in the type III gold alloy group (P<.05). IS group showed lesser surface roughness changes compared to SS group in porcelain and gold alloy group (P<.05). According to surface profiler, surface roughness of SS group showed greater than those of PS, IS and control groups and IS group showed lesser than those of SS group in all specimen groups. Type III gold alloy group had large changes on surface roughness than those of porcelain, titanium, zirconia (P<.05). Conclusion: The result of this study showed that newly developed copper alloy scaler tip can cause minimal roughness impacts on the surface of implant and dental materials; therefore this may be a useful alternative for prophylaxis of implant and restored teeth.
참고문헌 (32)
- Listgarten MA, "Pathogenesis of periodontitis", J Clin Periodontol, 13, pp.418~430 (1986)
- Bin AlShaibah WM, "Comparative study on the microbial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns", J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 30, pp.206~211 (2012)
- Gristina AG, "Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration", Science, 237, pp.1588~1595 (1987)
- Pameijer CH, "Surface characteristics of teeth following periodontal instrumentation: a scanning electron microscope study", J Periodontol, 43, pp.628~633 (1972)
- Mitchell DF, "The irritational qualities of dental materials", J Am Dent Assoc, 59, pp.954~966 (1959)
- Podshadley AG, "Rat connective tissue response to pontic materials", J Prosthet Dent, 16, pp.110~118 (1966)
- Axelsson P, "Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 6years", J Clin Periodontol, 8, pp.239~248 (1981)
- Axelsson P, "The significance of maintenance care in the treatment of periodontal disease", J Clin Periodontol, 8, pp.281~294 (1981)
- Renvert S, "Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a literature review", J Clin Periodontol, 35, pp.305~315 (2008)
- Drisko CL, "Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Accademy of Periodontology. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology", J Periodontol, 71, pp.1792~1801 (2000)
- Tunkel J, "A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis", J Clin Periodontol, 29, pp.72~81 (2002)
- Walmsley AD, "Advances in power driven pocket", root instrumentation, 2008, pp.35, 22~28
- Oda S, "Current concepts and advances in manual and power-driven instrumentation", Periodontol 2000, 36, pp.45~58 (2004)
- Jang MJ, "Evaluation of the neurotoxicity and acute systemic toxicity of copper ultrasonic scaler tip", 석사, Department of Prosthodontics, pp.2013
- Kawai K, "Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials", Oper Dent, 26, pp.396~400 (2001)
- Kantorski KZ, "Surface roughness and bacterial adherence to resin composites and ceramics", Oral Health Prev Dent, 7, pp.29~32 (2009)
- Thomson-Neal D, "Effects of various prophylactic treatments on titanium, sapphire, and hydroxyapatite-coated implants: an SEM study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 9, pp.300~311 (1989)
- Stefani LA, "The care and maintenance of the dental implant patient", J Dent Hyg, 62, pp.464~466 (1988)
- Rapley JW, "The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.47~52 (1990)
- Lee SY, "Effects of ultrasonic scaling and periodontal curettage on surface roughness of porcelain", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.227~232 (1995)
- Vigolo P, "An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods", J Prosthet Dent, 103, pp.283~287 (2010)
- Kawashima H, "Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study", J Periodontol, 78, pp.1689~1694 (2007)
- Hong JW, "Effect of wear on tooth surface and efficiency of new ultrasonic scaler tip", 석사, School of Dentistry, pp.2013
- Augthun M, "In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfac", J Periodontol, 69, pp.857~864 (1998)
- Parham PL Jr, "Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasmasprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation", J Oral Implantol, 15, pp.78~86 (1989)
- Van de Velde E, "Subcutaneous emphysema of the oral floor during cleaning of a bridge fixed on an IMZ implant", Rev Belge Med Dent, 46, pp.64~71 (1991)
- Baek SH, "Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.1269~1274 (2012)
- Seol HW, "Surface alterations of several dental materials by a novel ultrasonic scaler tip", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.801~810 (2012)
- Gil YM, "Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips on the surface of restorative material", 석사, Department of Prosthodontics, pp.2011
- Kim HC, "Effects of various hygiene procedures on the surface characteristics of titanium abutments", 석사, Esthetic Restorative dentistry, pp.2010
- Dentkos TR, "Evaluation of cutting efficiency of orthograde ultrasonic tips by using a nonstatic model", J Endod, 34, pp.863~865 (2008)
- Quirynen M, "Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.1~19 (2002)