AHP법을 이용한 농촌마을종합개발사업의 사업항목별 중요도 설정에 관한 연구
A study on Classification System and Weighting Values for Comprehensive Development Projects of Rural Villages using AHP Method
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study generalized and systemized the unit-project items of 176 project districts for the rural village comprehensive development projects (RVCDP). This paper surveyed opinions of 111 answerers (7 specialists, 43 agents of Korea Rural Community corporation, and 61 agents of local government of cities and counties) in order to determine the classification system and their corresponding weighting values of the project items using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. From the results extracted by project plans of 176 project districts for 5 years from 2004 to 2008, this study decided a hierarchical system for unit-project items of RVCDP by AHP method, which consisted of three steps: 4 items for 1st step, 13 items for 2nd step, and 52 items for 3rd step. The first step contains 4 items of Strength of Rural-urban Exchange & Regional Capability (RURC), Green-income Infrastructure & Facility (GIF), Culture- health-welfare Facility, and Eco-environment & Landscape facility (ELF). In the survey of weighting values with AHP method, the analysis result for the first step showed that in opinion of specialists, GIF is more important than the others while in opinion of the other agents, RURC is more important. In the second step, Product Facility is more important in the specialists, whereas Strength of Resident Capability is the most important in the other agents. Analyzed unit project items as the third step, all answerers evaluated that the Education and Excursion for Rural Resident Capability has the highest weighting values.
Abstract
This study generalized and systemized the unit-project items of 176 project districts for the rural village comprehensive development projects (RVCDP). This paper surveyed opinions of 111 answerers (7 specialists, 43 agents of Korea Rural Community corporation, and 61 agents of local government of cities and counties) in order to determine the classification system and their corresponding weighting values of the project items using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. From the results extracted by project plans of 176 project districts for 5 years from 2004 to 2008, this study decided a hierarchical system for unit-project items of RVCDP by AHP method, which consisted of three steps: 4 items for 1st step, 13 items for 2nd step, and 52 items for 3rd step. The first step contains 4 items of Strength of Rural-urban Exchange & Regional Capability (RURC), Green-income Infrastructure & Facility (GIF), Culture- health-welfare Facility, and Eco-environment & Landscape facility (ELF). In the survey of weighting values with AHP method, the analysis result for the first step showed that in opinion of specialists, GIF is more important than the others while in opinion of the other agents, RURC is more important. In the second step, Product Facility is more important in the specialists, whereas Strength of Resident Capability is the most important in the other agents. Analyzed unit project items as the third step, all answerers evaluated that the Education and Excursion for Rural Resident Capability has the highest weighting values.
참고문헌 (15)
- 김경량, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 효율적 추진을 위한 중간평가체계 개발", 농촌계획, 12(2), pp.65~73 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 김대식, "농촌관광기반의 지속가능한 마을정비 유형의 설정", 농촌계획, 11(1), pp.45~53 (2005), 한국농촌계획학회
- 김대식, "어메니티자원과 인적자원을 고려한 농촌마을의 관광잠재력 평가기법 개발", 농촌계획, 13(2), pp.7~16 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- 김대식, "농촌마을 단위 그린투어리즘 포텐셜 조사 분석 연구", 한국농공학회논문집, 51(3), pp.15~24 (2009), 한국농공학회
- 김묘정, "농촌 장수 마을 공간계획을 위한 기초연구", 농촌계획, 13(2), pp.107~120 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- 김혜민, "농촌마을개발사업의 전개와 주민참여에 관한 연구 - 산청남사 전통테마마을을 대상으로-", 농촌계획, 12(3), pp.1~11 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 박은식, "지역사회리더 리더십역량의 중요-성취도 분석", 농촌계획, 12(1), pp.59~66 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 박창석, "농촌어메니티에 기초한 농총자원 중요도 평가 및 순위적 관계 분석", 국토계획, 37(6), pp.21~35 (2002), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 엄대호, "BSC에 의한 농촌마을 그린투어리즘 성과지표 개발에 관한 연구", 농촌계획, 12(3), pp.43~55 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 이병원, "농촌관광사업에서 마을주민들이 인식하는 갈등의 원인 및 영향에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 이승한, "AHP법을 이용한 농촌마을종합개발사업의 사업항목별 중요도 설정에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2010
- 임창수, "농촌마을 수준에서의 어메니티 강화 및 저해요소 평가등급 체계 구축", 농촌계획, 13(2), pp.27~38 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- 전영미, "도시민의 선호도를 바탕으로 한 농촌마을의 관광자원 실태와 정비방향", 한국농촌계획학회지, 9(1), pp.55~64 (2003)
- 조중현, "농촌지역개발사업 추진과정에서 표출된 주민 간 갈등의 근거 이론적 해석 : 농촌체험마을 사례를 중심으로", 농촌계획, 14(2), pp.1~12 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
- 한경수, "농촌마을종합개발사업 중간 점검을 위한 평가지표 적용 사례", 농촌계획, 13(2), pp.121~132 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회