취약지역 생활여건 개조사업 대상지 선정 평가지표의 적정성 분석
Analysis of Adequacy of Evaluation Indicators for Selection of Project sites for Living Conditions Renovation Projects in Vulnerable Residential Areas
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, evaluation indicators for quantitative and qualitative indicators were presented by resetting the evaluation indicators for the selection of the living conditions renovation project for vulnerable residential areas by reflecting the results of expert importance. The appropriateness of the project selection evaluation index was reviewed by comparing the results of the expert AHP importance survey to make the project sustainable and to discover vulnerable villages. Evaluation items were constructed based on the guidelines for selecting the target site, and AHP importance evaluation was performed using this evaluation item as a proxy variable. Based on the data collected from 152 villages in Gimhae-si for case studies, the evaluation results were derived by applying the existing guideline evaluation indicators and evaluation indicators reflecting the importance proposed in this study. As a result of the study, Overall, there was a positive correlation between the results of the existing guideline evaluation and the results of the AHP importance survey, but in detail, there is a difference in the results evaluated by the two evaluation methods. In the future, if the scope of participating experts is expanded to supplement the importance evaluation, and the evaluation grade is set by analyzing quantitative data from Gyeongsangnam-do or rural areas nationwide, local governments and others will use this evaluation index as basic data when promoting the project.
Abstract
In this study, evaluation indicators for quantitative and qualitative indicators were presented by resetting the evaluation indicators for the selection of the living conditions renovation project for vulnerable residential areas by reflecting the results of expert importance. The appropriateness of the project selection evaluation index was reviewed by comparing the results of the expert AHP importance survey to make the project sustainable and to discover vulnerable villages. Evaluation items were constructed based on the guidelines for selecting the target site, and AHP importance evaluation was performed using this evaluation item as a proxy variable. Based on the data collected from 152 villages in Gimhae-si for case studies, the evaluation results were derived by applying the existing guideline evaluation indicators and evaluation indicators reflecting the importance proposed in this study. As a result of the study, Overall, there was a positive correlation between the results of the existing guideline evaluation and the results of the AHP importance survey, but in detail, there is a difference in the results evaluated by the two evaluation methods. In the future, if the scope of participating experts is expanded to supplement the importance evaluation, and the evaluation grade is set by analyzing quantitative data from Gyeongsangnam-do or rural areas nationwide, local governments and others will use this evaluation index as basic data when promoting the project.
참고문헌 (22)
- "7study sites (Jinyeong-eup, Saenglim-myeon, Juchonmyeon, Sangdong-myeon, Jinlye-myeon, Daedong-myeon, Hanlim-myeon) administrative data", ~
- Policy Suggestions for Regeneration and Reuse of Empty Homes in Deprived Areas, "Architecture & Urban Research Institute", AURI, ~, pp.AURI-basic-2016-5 (2016)
- Cho, S., "Study on Characteristics and Tasks of Regeneration Project in the Low-rise Deteriorate Residential Area: Focused on Saethul Maul Projects in the Jeonju Area", Master, pp.2020
- Choi, Y. W., "he Classification and Activation Strategy of Rural Development Projects", Master, pp.2010
- Choi, Y. W., "Designing Optimal Workload and Cost for Efficient Implementation of the Regional Community Reinforcement Project", Doctoral, pp.2015
- 최영완, "일반농산어촌개발 지역역량강화사업비의 적정요율 산정", 농촌계획, 19(3), pp.131~144 (2013), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 정건채, "취약지역 마을의 건축경관이미지형성에 관한 연구 - 새뜰마을사업 대상마을을 중심으로 -", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 18(3), pp.17~24 (2016), 한국농촌건축학회[DOI]
- 주희선, "AHP 분석을 통한 빈집활용방안 우선순위 평가 - 경상남도 도시와 농촌지역 비교 -", 한국주거학회논문집, 30(1), pp.97~104 (2019), 한국주거학회[DOI]
- 강기훈, "마을만들기사업 주민참여 프로그램이 노인들의 공동체의식과 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향 - 부여군 부여읍 구교1·3리의 새뜰마을사업을 중심으로 -", 국토계획, 54(1), pp.95~107 (2019), 대한국토·도시계획학회[DOI]
- Kang, M. R., "Case Study of Experience of Making Neighborhood Villagers Participating in Conflict Mediation Program", Master, pp.2017
- 김고원, "안전한 주거환경을 위한 새뜰마을사업 분석 연구", 환경디자인과 안전, 11(1), pp.141~176 (2020), 한국셉테드학회[DOI]
- 김남숙, "도시재생사업활성화를 위한 주민대학 사례연구: 강점모델을 기반으로 한 융합적 접근", 한국융합학회논문지, 10(10), pp.249~257 (2019), 한국융합학회[DOI]
- Kim, Y. J, Eun, H. C., "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs", A Study on the Activation Plan of Complete Region in Rural Development Project, 21 (2014)
- 권기욱, "참여주체의 관점에서 본 새뜰마을사업의 정책적 함의", 한국지적학회지, 33(3), pp.17~27 (2017), 한국지적학회[DOI]
- Jinju Okbong Saeteul Village Project Master Plan (MP)Establishment Service, "Land and Housing Research Institute", ~ (2016)
- A Study on the Performance Diagnosis and Evaluation of the Saeddeul Village Project-Targeting 30 Selected Districts in Urban Areas in 2015-, "Land and Housing Research Institute", ~ (2019)
- Lee, S. S., "A study on strategies for improving deteriorated residential areas from a perspective of urban regeneration-", Master, Graduate School of Industry & Science, pp.2019
- Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, "Rural Village Project 20 Years White Paper" (2013)
- Plan of Rural Convention 2022, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs", ~ (2022)
- Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, "Selection Guidelines for the 2024Living Conditions Renovation Projects in Vulnerable Residential Areas", ~ (2023)
- 박성남, "쇠퇴지역 빈집 특성 및 빈집 재생 시사점: 주민과지역 전문가 인식을 중심으로", 도시설계, 19(1), pp.5~20 (2018), 한국도시설계학회[DOI]
- Yang, W. S., "Analysis of Actual Conditions and Improvement Plans for Project to Improve Living Conditions in Vulnerable Residential Areas of Rural(Saedtul Village Project)", Presidental Committee on Regional Development, 2015, pp.9~24 (2015)